Originally posted by RockySullivan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lets get Lechmere off the hook!
Collapse
X
-
But Paul didn't work at Pickford's did he??Originally posted by Amanda View PostYes, along with 88 other Pickford's workers living in Whitechapel.....
Amanda
G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
-
I'm not now sure why I made the comment in parentheses because it is true! "There was a pool of blood where the neck of deceased was lying in Buck's-row" (Evidence of PC Neil, Times 3 Sept 1888).Originally posted by David Orsam View Postyet Constable Neil saw "a pool of blood" (not strictly true!)
Comment
-
Lechmere saw an unknown policeman with the victim.Originally posted by Fisherman View PostA thread in which I would like for people to state what speaks against Lechmere as being the Whitechapel killer.
Here is the perfect opportunity to overwhelm me with good hard evidence that he could not have dun it, inklings why he would be innocent, cleverly thought-out scenarios that must exclude Charles the carman, convictions, expertise, experience - anything that tells us why Charles Allen Lechmere could or would not have been the Ripper.
Once it begins dropping in, I aim to process and list it, and at some stage, I will post the outcome.
Itīs a one-in-a-lifetime chance - who would have thought that I would present a thread by such a mouthwatering name...? Go for it and go hard!
Good luck and all the best,
Fisherman
Comment
-
Best post on the thread.Originally posted by John Wheat View PostThe title of this thread is thoroughly misleading there's nothing to put Lechmere on the hook in the first place.G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Where does he say this?Originally posted by Pierre View PostLechmere saw an unknown policeman with the victim."It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins twisting facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts." Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (as Sherlock Holmes).
Comment

Comment