DNA error

[GUT]

You heard it here first:
http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=8370

[ATTACH]16370[/ATTACH]

Love the skippy's on their heads.

[robhouse]

You heard it here first:
http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=8370

[ATTACH]16370[/ATTACH]

Chris, We have known each other for a while now, and I had no idea you were Australian!

RH

[Chris]

Well, no surprise here really. Looks like there was a major error made in the DNA probability calculations. Basically, it claims he misidentified a mutation as 314.1C rather than 315.1C, which was the basis for the identification with Eddowes, and rather than being rare it turns out to be shared by 99% of people of European descent.

Anyway, here's a link to the article. I realize people here probably already know this as the article points out that the error was first noted by some Australian researchers posting here on casebook!

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news...ectid=11345140

You heard it here first:
http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=8370

[GUT]

Yeah but if Aussies spotted it, it could be all upside down!

[JeffHamm]

Hi all,

Well, no surprise here really. Looks like there was a major error made in the DNA probability calculations. Basically, it claims he misidentified a mutation as 314.1C rather than 315.1C, which was the basis for the identification with Eddowes, and rather than being rare it turns out to be shared by 99% of people of European descent.

Anyway, here's a link to the article. I realize people here probably already know this as the article points out that the error was first noted by some Australian researchers posting here on casebook!

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news...ectid=11345140