Tweet
If it was down to just these two options who would be the best bet for the Ripper. More importantly WHY?
(Can be Aaron or Anderson's suspect if you prefer.)
(Can be Aaron or Anderson's suspect if you prefer.)
-
Jack the Ripper - Double Cross -
Anderson's suspect is definitely a better suspect than Aaron Kosminski, because Anderson's suspect includes the possibility of Aaron being the Ripper, and also includes additional possibilities. But even Aaron is a better suspect than Cross. Just the reasonable possibility of Aaron being Anderson's suspect is enough to make him a better suspect than Cross. I don't find anything about Cross' discovery of Nichols' body to be at all suspicious, or anything that he did afterward. Cross did walk through the area where the murders occurred on the way to and from work, but Aaron lived in that area. -
If Aaron Kosminski were a one-legged, blind dwarf living in Manchester at the time of the murders he would still be a better suspect than Cross.
Herlock Sholmes
”I don’t know who Jack the Ripper was…and neither do you.”Comment
-
Anderson himself is probably a better suspect than Cross!Comment
-
Anderson was originally named as part of the Royal Conspiracy in the 1970s, but was replaced by Walter Sickert when it was found that Anderson wasn't in England for some of the murders. It would later be shown that Sickert also wasn't in England for some of the murders.Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post
"The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren
"Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven BlomerComment
Comment