George William Topping Hutchinson Records

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by The Good Michael View Post
    Lechmere,

    Thanks for getting all this Topping stuff in one place. It's sealing the doom of Topping as Ripper idea.

    Mike
    Hi The Good michael

    Even if Hutch is Toppy-what difference does it make? There are so many serial killers that have had what appears to be a "normal" family/personal life. Dennis rader, gary ridgway, John wayne gacy, ted Bundy for example.

    Anyway
    Good work Lechmere (my above to GM is not intended to detract from your work on Hutch). keep it coming.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    This is Toppy in the 1891 census.
    (I was going to do it chronologically but some of my copies are poor and I may need to re-do them).
    He was living at 69 Warren Street, in the Civil Parish of St Pancras, the Ecclesiastical Parish of St Saviour’s, in the Parliamentary Borough of South St Pancras.
    He is listed as George William T Hutchinson, a lodger, single, aged 24, a plumber employed by someone else (i.e. not self employed), born in London, Norwood (which then was Surrey but is now in the London Borough of Lambeth).
    No less than 16 people are listed under 69 Warren Street, in three households.
    In the first household is Mr Bates, his wife and son. They are occupying two rooms.
    Then there is Mr Markham, his wife and daughter, occupying another two rooms.
    The remainder of the house is a Lodging House, of which Catherine Wallace is the keeper and it consists of ten rooms. Nine lodgers are listed. Four are policemen, two a joiners, one a fireman, one (the only female, and she is aged 61) acts as the assistant lodging house keeper and then there is Toppy.
    It is important to note that this wasn’t a house that had a couple of lodgers. It is actually a smallish lodging house.
    I would not be surprised if there were in fact more than lodgers as most lodging houses drastically underestimated the number of inmates in the census return.
    On Booth’s map it is purple – meaning mixed, some comfortable others poor.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Lechmere,

    Thanks for getting all this Topping stuff in one place. It's sealing the doom of Topping as Ripper idea.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Malcolm X
    replied
    yes and you're doing great work, it will also be very interesting to trace this GH well after 1888, because this is important too.
    Last edited by Malcolm X; 09-13-2011, 04:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    Toppy's son Reg claimed he was the witness.
    Some say this was a false claim with a variety of possible explanations given as to why he may have made such a claim.
    Some say the signature matches, some say it (and other signatures) doesn't.

    Some say that Toppy couldn't have ben Kelly's Hutch for a variety of reasons (he was living in Warren Street in 1891 as a plumber for example).

    I am looking at all his and his family's movements to see if it is plausible that Toppy could have been living in the Victoria Home as a groom/labourer in 1888.
    It had been said that as Warren Street was relatively prosperous, and he was a violin playing goody-two shoes and he was living as a lodger in a building with policemen at the time of the 1891 census, then he couldn't have been living in a poor place in 1888.
    However, I just showed that he lived in one of the worst streets in London in 1899. He also seems to have been a bit of a fly-by-night throughout the 1890s, never settling anywhere for long. He also got his wife pregnant before marrying her.

    And when he finally settled down it was not in a prosperous working class street but in a rather poor street where he shared his house with another family.

    I have a lot more to put up yet to get a more rounded picture.
    Last edited by Lechmere; 09-13-2011, 03:51 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malcolm X
    replied
    i'm going to ask some dumb questions so please forgive me

    1....is this Toppy that you mention here supposed to be the actual Kelly eyewitness

    2....does his signature here match the one on his eyewitness statement.


    i dont believe that Kelly's George Hutchinson that we all know of, is the guy that we're after, i think we're after another George Hutchinson.

    for me, GH is JTR but i think he's someone else with the same name, my guess is GH left Whitechapel after the murders, but our Toppy remained here and never killed again and this bothers me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    I have already reproduced this christening record for Toppy’s eldest son George William Hutchinson junior, for 2nd April 1899 but here it is again.
    Interestingly George William Hutchinson junior’s birthday is given as 18th November 1898, seven months after his parents’ marriage. Toppy was very precise and had an eye for detail – so did he do the maths?
    The Christening took place at Holy Trinity Church, Morgan Street.
    They gave their address as 10 Barbel Street, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE.
    Toppy’s wife Florence Beatrice got Christened at the same time – her birthday is given as 29th March 1879 so yes she was 20 when she got married.
    I also just noticed that her mother was called Clara so she definitely was the witness at the wedding.
    Barbel Street gets a very bad review by Booth – the worst street in the area full of thieves and prostitutes – windows broken, patched, stuffed, all doors open – and it gets worse. Coloured black on his map. And the inspection was done more or less while Toppy was living there.
    Here’s a link:

    Now someone who lived in such a street just couldn’t have lived at the Victoria Home... could he?
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Lechmere; 09-13-2011, 04:34 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    Toppy’s marriage certificate – 15th May 1898 to Florence Jervis.
    He is listed as a plumber aged 29.
    She was 20.
    They gave their address as 576 Mile End Road, but they are not listed at that address in either the 1898 or 1899 electoral register – the same seemingly unconnected person was there on both these dates.
    This is near Mile End Tube station, which in turn is quite close to Holy Trinity Church, on Morgan Street, which is where they were married - and where their first son was christened.
    Toppy’s father George was a plumber and was deceased.
    Her father William was a clerk and was a witness. I think his wife was the other witness.
    I have not yet located the Jervis family in any census.
    A nice Toppy signature as well.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    great

    Hello Lechmere. Great work! Take a bow (but not the street--heh-heh).

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    I've got them all - they're coming next!

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Hi Lechmere

    Great work. I assume we have GWT's census records?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    Or Thomas Brandon

    Leave a comment:


  • Archaic
    replied
    Hi Lechmere.

    Thanks very much for posting these records. I like Ruby's idea of trying to find out what stories the Speareys or the Tidimans might have heard.

    Best regards,
    Archaic

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    1938 – The end of an era. How poignant, Reg but no George William Topping.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    1937 – and at last we have Reg! (And an interloper Thomas Brandon)
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X