Hi Gareth,
Yours is a very reasonable possibility.
On balence, though, I'm inclined to consider the identifcation of Hutchinson with the wideawake loiterer as the more likely, primarily on the grounds of timing and coincidence.
Best regards,
Ben
Seeing Sarah
Collapse
X
-
I guess that's the case, but so close.
She saw a man loitering, he also was loitering as he admitted in the same vicinity.
Coincidence?
Hmm!
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Norm,Originally posted by Normy View PostLewis and Hutchinson seem to be in the same place at pretty much the same time
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Sam
Lewis and Hutchinson seem to be in the same place at pretty much the same time, is it likely a man just slipped in there as they came and went?
Or is it Hutchinson she sees but either he does see her or it's an accomplice maybe watching out in case Barnett appeared.
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Ben,Originally posted by Ben View PostYes, it would have been very hard for the wideawake-wearer not to have noticed Sarah Lewis.
Leave a comment:
-
The man at 2:30
He's meen and he's dirty
He waits in the shadows and watches where she goes
And Mary's been singing to keep the wolf from her door
But the wolf in sheeps clothing just smiled and said,'more'
Now all is quiet and all the clowns have all gone to bed
As he creeps down the passage to awaken the dead
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Ben
Thanks for the input, yes it's possible he had spotted her earlier of noticed her and saw his opportunity.
It might even be possible that Hutchinson was in the lodging doing the deed while he had a lookout outside waiting for him, who omitted to tell Hutchinson that a woman had walked passed.
Were there not two men seen at the scene of the Stride murder. According to Israel Schwartz
Second man: Aged 35, 5'11", fresh complexion, light brown hair, dark overcoat, old black hard felt hat with a wide brim, clay pipe.
I'm not sure if this would be the same as a wide awake hat!
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Normy, and welcome.
If this was the ripper whether it was Hutchinson or not, doesn’t it imply he was targeting a particular person and not striking randomly?
All the best,
Ben
P.S. Yes, it would have been very hard for the wideawake-wearer not to have noticed Sarah Lewis.Last edited by Ben; 07-09-2008, 07:12 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Seeing Sarah
Hi all
I’m not well read up on the facts here but was pondering this:
If Hutchinson was the wide awake hat man and he was outside Kelly’s Lodgings for 45 minutes wouldn’t he have seen Sarah Lewis walk passed? She clearly saw him standing there, whoever he was.
If this was the ripper whether it was Hutchinson or not, doesn’t it imply he was targeting a particular person and not striking randomly?
CheersTags: None
Leave a comment: