Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For those who don't believe in "JTR"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    I have qualms about converting another to my point of view. I would never try that.
    LC
    With a rate of 200 posts per month ?
    Oh my dear Lynn, you're sure kidding - and I like that.

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    what really happened

    Hello Harry. Thanks.

    Before beginning, permit me to address your final sentence. I have qualms about converting another to my point of view. I would never try that. However, I am delighted to talk about whatever I happen to believe, and why.

    First, notice how you phrase your reaction.

    "I have a hard time buying that there were two (or more) overlapping killers at the same time who all had a penchant for butchering the local prostitutes, and all of whom had similar MOs."

    It sounds like you are referring to two serial killers, both bent on killing prostitutes. Put THAT way, I, too, cannot buy it.

    And that because:

    1. I don't think there were ANY serial killers in Whitechapel in 1888.

    and

    2. I don't think anyone was interested in killing prostitutes.

    (I assume we are limiting our discussion to the C5. Correct me if I am wrong.)

    Perhaps, the question before us, then, is How many of the C5 were killed by the same hand?

    I have no doubt, whatsoever, that Polly and Annie were killed by the same hand and that the hand was one belonging to one of the wandering lunatics in Whitechapel--most likely, Jacob Isenschmid.

    Likewise, I have little doubt that Kate's killer was a copycat killer who deliberately tried (and failed) to reproduce the first two killings.

    (I believe you wished to omit discussion of the Stride killing. Happy to oblige.)

    "MJK" is an enigma to all. Perhaps I could say something intelligent if I knew whom she were. But my research involves resettled witnesses and Sir Ed Jenkinson's network of spies--which included barmaids.

    Happy to expand where desired.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Last edited by lynn cates; 07-11-2014, 10:53 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello David.
    And don't forget a full proof demonstrating the reality of the external material world. (heh-heh)

    Cheers.
    LC
    I know it's somewhere in the library of Babel, Lynn.
    Give me time.

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Hello gents,

    Thanks for indulging me.

    By 'JTR' I'm not talking about the media invention cooked up by the press. I'm referring specifically to a lone killer who murdered prostitutes in Whitechapel. There seems to be a fringe group who believe that the murders weren't linked, and I'm not only talking in regards to the Stride controversy.

    I'd like for people to explain, in so many words, why they believe the majority of these murders were not carried out by the same hand? I have a hard time buying that there were two (or more) overlapping killers at the same time who all had a penchant for butchering the local prostitutes, and all of whom had similar MOs. Now's your chance to make me a believer.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Discourse on Method

    Hello David. Thanks.

    You're bloody well right. And don't forget a full proof demonstrating the reality of the external material world. (heh-heh)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi Harry,

    If you want Lynn to reply, you've to write a 375p treatise on the JtR concept, first.
    And don't forget the footnotes.

    Good luck

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    What proposition asserted?

    Hello Harry. Interesting question.

    I presume that, before a coherent answer could be given to this, one would need to spell out, precisely, the meaning of "JTR."

    So, what precisely does "JTR" refer to?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Lucky
    replied
    Hi Harry

    No, I don't believe in 'JtR' - I believe in the Whitechapel murderer, the killer of ten women in the East End, between 1888 - 1891

    JTR is the name given on a hoax letter sent to the Central news agency. The author of the letter is extremely unlikely to be the killer of the women in Whitechapel, so attempting to study the killings through this 'ripper' view point is fundamentally flawed. The way we think is coloured by the terms we use to understand, and to continue to look at these murders through this particular lens - the whole concept of 'Jack the Ripper', and thereby dividing up the murders in to the different groups of ripper killings, non-ripper killings and interrupted ripper killings is largely an exercise in futility.

    what would an interrupted non-ripper killing look like anyway ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    started a topic For those who don't believe in "JTR"

    For those who don't believe in "JTR"

    Could you please succinctly explain your reasons for believing so?
Working...
X