Originally posted by Ben
View Post
This time you obviously missed that I played with words when answering David.
And equally obviously, you have apparently missed that I have stated on these boards that the information that Fleming was 6 ft 7 very much contributed to my growing disinterest in him.
Fleming remains on the list, of course, and cannot be ruled out. But you need to realize that I do not do my Ripperology the way you do yours. I adjust to whatever facts that may surface, I change my mind when the evidence calls for it and I would never prolong my stay in a burnt-down house.
In the next issue of the A-Z, there is every chance I will surface as speaking of the odds of BOTH Fleming and Lechmere, respectively, being the Ripper. I hope that wonīt be too taxing and confusing. In fact, anybody could cast any suspect in the Ripperīs role and try and see what kind of case can be made for it. Accordingly, one author can research and present cases against more than one suspect.
Hope that helped,
Fisherman



In the early going Bury & Cohen are running neck and neck
Leave a comment: