So......who do you think it was?

[Rainbow]

yes , the phrase ( jewes are the MEN .. )

[GUT]

G'Day Rainbow

And is there any evidence or material, you can point me to, to support your theory?

[Rainbow]

at least two , but if you want my opinion , they have to be more than two persons , and they may have women between them too

[GUT]

G'Day Rainbow

So do I take it you see more than 2 in the conspiracy?

[Rainbow]

GUT ,

the accomplice will have the same motive , aim , doctrine , of his group , he will not change his belief for a pardon offer , besides , he will be afraid of his company if he betray them ..

I can't be sure whom they were , but I do believe they were more than one person who committed those crimes

The Jack the Ripper murders are not traditional sexual crimes , one can smell the conspiracy atmosphere all over it .. a conspiracy of some kind for sure

[GUT]

Sorry Rainbow

Not sure I follow,

Political Crimes?

he will be afraid of them too

Who are you suggesting will be afraid of whom?

I must be a bit thick today.

[Rainbow]

Thank you GUT

also don't forget the timing of kelly's murder

a pardon offer will not change their minds that easy when we are talking about political crimes , he will be afraid of them too

[GUT]

G'Day Rainbow

and welcome on-board.

But have you considered that an accomplice really makes the fact that it was never solved stranger, especially with a pardon offered for an accomplice who squealed.

[Rainbow]

no one has really examined the possibility (except from the royal theory) of two men one killer one lookout it would explain the killers reckless behaviour.

In three occasions there were two men in the Scene , Tabram , Stride and Kelly

and I think those crimes were Political murders because of the Goulston Street Graffito ( the juwes , Blamed ) and maybe also the From Hell letter witch was sent to George Lusk, the president of the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee

that can explain the motive for more than one man

[JTRSickert]

My first post to this blog, so this is my answer to the first question:

In my opinion, I personally think the top three suspects and whom I think had the most likelihood of being Jack the Ripper are in this order:

1. Kosminski

2. Klosowski/Chapman

3. David Cohen

[GUT]

G'Day Amanda

I can't see two people being involved in these murders.

It also at least doubles, probably more than doubles, the chance of word leaking out.

[lynn cates]

surly

Hello Roy. Well, don't be so Cross about it. (heh-heh)

Cheers.
LC

[DRoy]

I can't believe nobody has said Lechmere yet.

Cheers
DRoy

[Amanda Sumner]

I still maintain it was not one but two persons, and closely related to Martha Tabram, who was the catalyst for the rest, at least the next four. It started out as a mugging, escalated to a frenzied murder, and the "high" from this initiated the others.

I can't see two people being involved in these murders.
What would the motive be? It stretches the imagination too far to think that both would have such serious issues with women that they would, together, delight in the killing and mutilation of their victims.
As for Tabram being mugged, why? These women had on them a few coppers at best and it seems a bit excessive, to say the least, that they were after her pocket handkerchief or piece of broken mirror!

[GUT]

Tom

I think it's more likely that the killer or killer(s) names did become known to the police and are known to us than that they weren't. The police collectively and individually followed many leads and researched many theories. They simply didn't have the proof to convict anyone.

That disregards the fact that throughout history there have been many cases where the police simply had no real idea who the culprit was.

I also think that clear up stats on murder were as good [or maybe better] than today.