Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So......who do you think it was?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • John Wheat
    replied
    To Dave

    You make some valid points. I did begin the post with possibly Bury. I accept there are some problems with his candidacy which you have underlined. But for me he remains the best candidate we have for the reasons I mentioned. Obviously the case is not water tight but is much stronger than the cases made for most if not all the other known suspects. You mention Jack the Ripper always having an escape strategy. I would agree with this however I see from Bury's actions in and around his wife's murder a man who is unravelling so to speak. I wonder what Bury's mental state was like at this time. As for Bury not loving his mother I suspect he hated her.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Hi John

    Nice to hear from you again.

    So we're talking (latterly at least) Liz Stride and you say:-

    Possibly William Henry Bury. For various reasons. He killed his prostitute wife in a similar manner.
    I'm sorry mate but Long Liz had her throat cut...the whole point is that Bury did NOT cut his wife's throat...he strangled her with a ligature...

    Added to which, Bury's abdominal woundings, obviously undisturbed as opposed to Liz, seem desultory and mildly spiteful by comparison with the most determined abdominal assaults on the other canonical victims...

    He is one of the few known killers out of all the known suspects.
    True...and this is why I find him interesting...though ultimately unconvincing...

    He is known to have carried knives
    Along with a large proportion of the male population, to many of whom they'd be merely a tool of the trade.

    He was phsyically abusive to his wife.
    Again sadly all too common then, (and in some cases now)...

    His mother's christian name was Mary and her middle name Jane which may explain the overkill on Mary Jane Kelly.
    Did he not love his mummy?

    There is of course another factor at play here...whoever authored the Whitechapel Murders (and I word it this way out of respect for Lynn and others) always seemed to have an escape strategy...or enough simple cunning to escape capture...Bury just sat there for a week like a damp twat and then gave himself up? Does this really sound like a cunning JtR...even an exhausted one? In Late Victorian Britain, all he had to do to escape the hangman was catch a train to anywhere, announce he was Mr Smith and start afresh...

    No I'm afraid Bury doesn't do it for me...

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Possibly William Henry Bury. For various reasons. He killed his prostitute wife in a similar manner. He is one of the few known killers out of all the known suspects. He largely matches psych profiles of Jack. He is known to have carried knives. He was phsyically abusive to his wife. His mother's christian name was Mary and her middle name Jane which may explain the overkill on Mary Jane Kelly.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    I want to hear what Tom Wescott thinks...I make no secret in finding him totally exasperating at times, but he really does know his stuff, and the Stride murder is one of his specialities...

    How much he will/can release with book(s) pending I don't know but...

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • andy1867
    replied
    I go to and fro with every book, film or even post I read...
    First I was convinced it was Druitt...then obviously Ishenwotsit Kominsky, Kaminsky...maybe Abberline...then Johnny Depp.
    The Scwaartz thing made me think it was a pair of predators...Pipe man and the bloke who was accosting Stride..cos I thought that may explain the differences in the wounds suffered by Strides and Eddowes...they were taking it in turns..one was very good at it (If you can use the word good)..the other just an acolyte sorta bloke who says "Can I have a go Jack?"
    So Jack lets him have a go at Stride then says..."Not bad lad...but lets nip down Mitre Sq..and I'll show you where you went wrong"
    So I dunno, ...its fascinating, its frustrating, theres loads of crap written, there are some brilliant books...The brilliant books , I find are also written by people who actually admit they don't know...the crap oines are penned by folk who think they do...and go to ridiculous lengths to prove it.
    Regards
    andy

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Rainbow

    What do you think he meant when he called out Lipski? If we add in Sxhwartz that makes 3.

    Isn't it more likely than not that the man Lewis saw was Hutch? If we Add in Botch and A-Man we're up to three again.

    Also it seems that there would be no real lack of people around n any event, which has always puzzled me why more people didn't see something, or is the answer simply a wish to avoid bringing oneself to the attention of the police.

    Leave a comment:


  • PC Fitzroy-Toye
    replied
    I consider him to be an unknown a character that was never a suspect, Ho and as a side thought the idear of two knifes has been mentioned its not a bad idear the neck cuts do seem to favor a long blade like a liston or a well ground butchers knife and something for the internal work more manageable say more akin to a sticking knife maybe? but then a blade of 6-7inc might be just as well for both types of cutting.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    stride :

    Israel Schwartz said that the man who threw the woman down called out, apparently to the man on the opposite side of the road, "Lipski", and then Schwartz walked away

    there were two men

    kelly :

    Sarah Lewis’ testimony , The man in the black wideawake hat, whom Sarah saw about 2.30 looking up Miller’s Court ‘as if waiting for someone to come out

    and there was Hutchinson who watch the scene for 45 minuets ..
    The two man theory has never been examined properly ....we have had the royal conspiracy for years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rainbow
    replied
    stride :

    Israel Schwartz said that the man who threw the woman down called out, apparently to the man on the opposite side of the road, "Lipski", and then Schwartz walked away

    there were two men

    kelly :

    Sarah Lewis’ testimony , The man in the black wideawake hat, whom Sarah saw about 2.30 looking up Miller’s Court ‘as if waiting for someone to come out

    and there was Hutchinson who watch the scene for 45 minuets ..
    Last edited by Rainbow; 01-25-2014, 04:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Rainbow

    Emma I'll concede.

    Martha wounds from two weapons does not prove two people, if and I repeat if you accept the double event at one hand, it is possible Jack carried more than one knife with him.

    How so more than one with Liz and Mary Jane?

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Oh, rainbows. I like those things.

    What do you think about the possibility that, as an example, Nichols and Chapman were how you say authentic, and maybe Stride, Eddowes, and Kelly were opportunistic?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rainbow
    replied
    also Emma Smith was attaked by three or four men ..

    Emma , Tabram , Stride , Kelly , in all of these cases there were more than one person in the scene

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    So is it your theory that this was a group of Jews?

    I must be extra thick tonight I just don't follow what your trying to suggest.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rainbow
    replied
    It is only my feeling .. after I read all of this .. no solid proof ..

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Sorry but how does that point to a conspiracy, and who wrote it do you think?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X