Evidence to prove a suspect valid

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day MrB

    I know I'm ignorant but can you point me to the posts on the cobbles?

    GUT

    Leave a comment:


  • Barnaby
    replied
    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
    Ah, but I always refused to go down under.

    MrB
    I think this eliminates MrBarnett as a suspect in the Whitechapel murders.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Tom,

    I am truly shocked. Just a few days ago we were having an intelligent conversation about cobblers, now we seem to have offended the cobbers.

    (By the way, I'm still convinced those cobbles were there in 1888 and were laid by the same blokes what laid the cobbles in Berners Street,)

    MrB

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day MrB

    I give up,

    Ah, but I always refused to go down under
    But you've missed a lot down under is good

    GUT

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
    Ah, but I always refused to go down under.

    MrB
    You never go a** to mouth!!!!

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Ah, but I always refused to go down under.

    MrB

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Down Under we say Digerdon't

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    GUT,

    He did all the swimming. I just clung on to his didgeridoo...

    MrB.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day MrB

    So:

    You hang out with Mason's with paint brushes!!

    I'm now suspicious of you.

    Funny though my Grandmothers next door neighbor new Rolf in Perth where as a young man he was a very good swimmer, so maybe just maybe you and he swam back to England. It's really not that far, honest.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Just for the record, Rolf spent the whole of the autumn of 1888 with me in the Outer Hebrides.

    And if you don't believe me, look it up in the Daily News.

    MrB.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    G'Day Tom

    I think you mean:

    If we find a witness who was a Mason and mean with a brush and canvass And had ties to the Royal Family I'd say we could put this baby to bed.

    GUT
    You're right. I should have been more thorough. Gotta stick to the facts, after all.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Tom

    I think you mean:

    If we find a witness who was a Mason and mean with a brush and canvass And had ties to the Royal Family I'd say we could put this baby to bed.

    GUT

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    G'Day Tom



    Or witness
    Or Mason

    GUT
    That goes without saying. If we find a witness who was a Mason and mean with a brush and canvass I'd say we could put this baby to bed.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Tom

    Or, of course, any well-known artist with ties to the royal family.
    Or witness
    Or Mason

    GUT

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Hi Raven. If by 'valid' you mean promote them from 'just some guy' to genuine suspect, then the best place to start would clearly be those who were suspected by someone in the police around the time of the murders. I would say someone who could be shown to have been in the area, possibly known to one or more of the victims, and who later...even years later...did something that showed he was capable of such murders, might also be a suspect.

    Or, of course, any well-known artist with ties to the royal family.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X