Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

John McCarthy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MrBarnett
    replied

    Originally posted by seanr View Post

    I don't know how to evaluate the Oylers in comparison but I'm told the estate was large enough to be shared amongst his nieces and nephews. Frederick William Nafzger was the nephew who received 31 Great Pearl Street and 6 handcarts.

    So, he had an estate large enough to be broken up and shared. Comparatively wealthy compared to the many living in the lodging houses who'd struggle to have two pennies to rub together.
    A comparison of probate records is helpful.

    Frederick William Gehringer of 31, Great Pearl Street, who died in May, 1909, left £564. 28s 7d.

    George Benjamin Oyler left £52, 999 16s when he died in 1921. His brother, Thomas Potter Oyler, left a mere £11k.
    Last edited by MrBarnett; 10-31-2020, 01:42 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanr
    replied
    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post

    How did Geringer’s wealth compare to that of the seriously rich Oylers?

    Gary
    I don't know how to evaluate the Oylers in comparison but I'm told the estate was large enough to be shared amongst his nieces and nephews. Frederick William Nafzger was the nephew who received 31 Great Pearl Street and 6 handcarts.

    So, he had an estate large enough to be broken up and shared. Comparatively wealthy compared to the many living in the lodging houses who'd struggle to have two pennies to rub together.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanr
    replied
    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post

    Thanks, Al.

    It’s an excellent book, on the whole, but it’s not without errors. I’d want to know Fiona’s source before I quoted it.
    I don't know for sure, but the great grand nephew of Fredrick Gehringer (the junior) mentioned to me in a brief correspondence that he was a source for much of Fiona Rule's material on the Gehringers. It may be a story passed down through the family, like the one about a member of the Gehringer clan being questioned in the Jack the Ripper investigation.
    Last edited by seanr; 10-31-2020, 01:06 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Originally posted by Al Bundy's Eyes View Post
    Having check Fiona Rules book, she clearly puts the Gehringer Sedan chair as "rumour has it".
    Thanks, Al.

    It’s an excellent book, on the whole, but it’s not without errors. I’d want to know Fiona’s source before I quoted it.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    What we are looking for are a J. McCarthy and his son S. McCarthy who were prominent East End businessmen and who had a talent for entertainment. Oh, and who contributed to the same causes as people named Crossingham, Cooney and Tempany.

    It’s a real brain teaser.
    Last edited by MrBarnett; 10-30-2020, 11:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Al Bundy's Eyes
    replied
    Having check Fiona Rules book, she clearly puts the Gehringer Sedan chair as "rumour has it".

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Scott,

    Jack and Steve McCarthy organised boxing ‘exhibitions’ and sold tickets from 27, Dorset Street.

    Steve’s wife Marie Kendal gave out food vouchers that could be redeemed at Jack’s shop in Dorset Street.

    Crossingham, Cooney and Tempany contributed to retirement funds for senior police officers.

    Remind me, what have your Lambeth PS and his son got going for them?

    Gary



    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Nelson
    replied
    It seems there existed three McCarthys -- the Landlord of Miller's Court, a boxing promotor/entertainer and a distinguished gentlemen (Esq)/fundraiser who attended luminary celebrations. Or were they one and the same? Or two the same?

    Leave a comment:


  • Al Bundy's Eyes
    replied
    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post

    I know it’s referred to by Fiona Rule in her ‘Worst Street in London’, but I was wondering whether Sean had traced it back any further.
    Yep, that's where I've read it.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Originally posted by Al Bundy's Eyes View Post
    I've definitely come across that sedan chair story, but I can't recall where? I remember thinking it was fanciful rubbish.
    I know it’s referred to by Fiona Rule in her ‘Worst Street in London’, but I was wondering whether Sean had traced it back any further.

    Leave a comment:


  • Al Bundy's Eyes
    replied
    I've definitely come across that sedan chair story, but I can't recall where? I remember thinking it was fanciful rubbish.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Originally posted by seanr View Post

    Well, I'm not sure it's the case that Duckworth's belief in McCarthy's notoriety comes from his having been MJK's landlord. Their are two local figures in the notes from 17th and 18th March 1898 which he pays such attention to, Jack McCarthy and F. Geringer. F. Geringer is Frederick Geringher whose living descendents believe to have been some sort of a crime lord who controlled 4 streets including Great Pearl Street and Little Pearl Street.

    Why no mention of Crossingham's and number 35, which was a double fitting the description Duckworth gives of a covert brothel? What makes you so sure this isn't one of the properties Duckworth is referring to?
    Sure, if you look at paperwork as to who legally owned the lodging houses in Dorset Street they were not mostly owned by McCarthy (although a fair number were) but in the context of the area walks for Booth's maps, it won't have been the legal ownership which was captured. The walk would have been a survey of an area with a local expert in this case a policeman, Sergeant French of H Division. The remarks on McCarthy will have been from an impression Duckworth received as to ownership most likely from Sergeant French. Duckworth probably thought McCarthy owned most of the houses because Sergeant French said so. The question is one of control, rather than legal ownership. Dorset Street belongs to McCarthy, Great Pearl Street belongs to Geringher. These probably were not views Duckworth brought with him on the day of the visit, this was the view of a Sergeant of H Division in 1898.
    Duckworth saw 35 Dorset Street and thought it was a house under the control of McCarthy.

    Further evidence in the text of the notes that these views are not entirely Duckworth's own comes next to the notes on Little Pearl Street where Duckworth added a note:



    Duckworth had already noted the presence of Geringher on Little Pearl Street. Geringher's relative wealth is famous, he is reputed to have had servants carry him around on a sedan chair, so the blackness of the rest of Little Pearl Street is not necessarily one of poverty, it is as reported by to Duckworth by Lewis (I'm not sure who this Lewis is) and for the main notes on the day, by Sergeant French.

    The view that Dorset Street belonged to McCarthy and that the houses on Dorset Street may have Sergeant French's and Duckworth simply noted that opinion. A H Division Sergeant in 1898 would tell a visitor to the area that Jack McCarthy, the owner of general shop on Dorset Street, ran the brothels there. It may not be conclusive, but it's also not nothing.
    Sean,

    I asked why no mention of Crossingham, not ‘Crossingham’s’. We have to question the local knowledge of a cop who thought McCarthy ran 35, Dorset Street. Another force to be reckoned with in Dorset Street was Annie McCarthy, Jacks sister-in-law and Bill Crossingham’s daughter. She ran the shop at 36, Dorset Street and dosshouses in Thrawl Street. Her minder, Billy Maher, was probably the toughest man in the street. After the Austin murder in 1901, he was pointed out by a PC as having got off two murder charges, when in fact it was only one.

    How did Geringer’s wealth compare to that of the seriously rich Oylers?

    Where did you get the Geringer sedan chair story from?

    Gary



    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Originally posted by seanr View Post

    I'll leave the other questions for others to answer, but Jack McCarthy's oldest son was born John McCarthy, but later became known as Steve or Stephen. He's notable because he was the comedian, singer and songwriter Stephen McCarthy who married music hall star Marie Kendall.
    That’s right, Sean. He was being billed as a comedian in the early 1890s.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Rookie Detective
    replied
    Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
    Does anyone else believe the "notorious" John McCarthy was the John McCarthy, Esq. who attended Abberline's retirement at the Three Nuns Hotel?
    If it is, then there’s a direct connection between a senior policeman with the landlord of one of the rippers victims.

    This then opens up a whole Pandora’s box of potential connotations which bring alive conspiracy theories galore.

    TRD



    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Nelson
    replied
    Does anyone else believe the "notorious" John McCarthy was the John McCarthy, Esq. who attended Abberline's retirement at the Three Nuns Hotel?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X