Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Soldier Jack?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • curious4
    replied
    Originally posted by Errata View Post
    Actually post traumatic stress in soldiers was pretty well documented by 1888. It was first identified at the turn of the century, well known and documented after the American Civil War. They hadn't figured out that all of the combat stress reactions were related, but they had about as good a handle on it as they did during early WW I. Which is to say, they knew what the problem was, they just didn't have a clue what to do about it. Theres a lovely movie with Johnathan Pryce called Regeneration on the first successful treatment of the problem if it interests you.

    If you're looking for a veteran to be Jack the Ripper, I recommend one from King Leopold of Belgium's monsters that he set loose in the Congo Free State.
    Hello Errata,

    Interesting - hadnīt heard that before. There was something called shell-shock, which was generally accepted - I worked after school in a private mental home (many, many moons ago) where one of the patients had that diagnosis. ( So long ago that I think I can say this) He was really disturbed and did actually try to kill one of the ward maids, but if you looked and acted fairly normal most of the time Iīm not sure it would have been recognised. Many soldiers were executed on grounds of desertion etc in WW1, I gather, so not really accepted as something tangible.

    Best wishes,
    C4

    P.S. Why not King Leopold himself - he was supposed to have been a horror!
    Last edited by curious4; 01-23-2012, 04:57 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Hunter View Post
    The killer would not necessarily have to be an active duty serviceman; a discharged veteran would suffice. More than a few veterans even enlisted in the merchant marine and were sought after by shipping lines for their experience and tolerance for structural discipline.




    That's very interesting, Trevor. Did he enlist under the surname Zahn?
    I do not know the answer to that in my opinion the true identity of Feigenbaum has never been fully established. He was convicted and executed under the name Carl Feigenbaum, but as is known amongst other names he used were those of Carl Zahn and Anton Zahn. However Zahn would seem to be the favourite surname based on current research.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rubyretro
    replied
    However, knowing a quick method of dispatch of the victim, the ruthlessness in ending someone's life and the acceptance and the excitement of danger on the killer's part could be indicative of the military experience of someone who's mind was troubled in other ways
    .
    I agree with Hunter

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    Actually post traumatic stress in soldiers was pretty well documented by 1888. It was first identified at the turn of the century, well known and documented after the American Civil War. They hadn't figured out that all of the combat stress reactions were related, but they had about as good a handle on it as they did during early WW I. Which is to say, they knew what the problem was, they just didn't have a clue what to do about it. Theres a lovely movie with Johnathan Pryce called Regeneration on the first successful treatment of the problem if it interests you.

    If you're looking for a veteran to be Jack the Ripper, I recommend one from King Leopold of Belgium's monsters that he set loose in the Congo Free State.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hunter
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman
    Seriously, Tabram may have been murdered by a pair of drunken soldiers, or one by himself, but as for a soldier being a serial killer? On the evidence at hand there's just no indication.
    Maybe, maybe not. Because of the range of murders, from April? until November? the soldier must surely have been stationed locally. Like at Wellington Barracks, or the Tower.
    That should have been easy to check if the police had considered the possibility, we don't know if hey did.
    The killer would not necessarily have to be an active duty serviceman; a discharged veteran would suffice. More than a few veterans even enlisted in the merchant marine and were sought after by shipping lines for their experience and tolerance for structural discipline.


    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott
    Well you may be interested to know that Feigenbaum served in the Prussian Army and fought at The Battle of Gravelotte in 1870.
    That's very interesting, Trevor. Did he enlist under the surname Zahn?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by K-453 View Post
    What about all the raping during wars?
    "Jack" did not make merry with his victims, as far as we know.

    The cruelties against civilians?
    Some say "Jack" gave them a swift send-off, no suffering, hence not cruelty as we generally apply the term.

    Annihilating of whole villages?
    Genocide was hardly the "Ripper's" style.

    Seriously, Tabram may have been murdered by a pair of drunken soldiers, or one by himself, but as for a soldier being a serial killer? On the evidence at hand there's just no indication.
    Maybe, maybe not. Because of the range of murders, from April? until November? the soldier must surely have been stationed locally. Like at Wellington Barracks, or the Tower.

    That should have been easy to check if the police had considered the possibility, we don't know if hey did.

    Regards, Jon s.

    Leave a comment:


  • K-453
    replied
    What about all the raping during wars? The cruelties against civilians? Annihilating of whole villages?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by K-453 View Post
    I quite agree with Hunter.

    For someone with serial killer tendencies, being a soldier could even be an occasion to live out some fantasies - to go man-hunting ...
    If the victims had been men, possibly, but as they were women, not the natural challenge for a soldier, I'm not so sure.

    Regards, Jon S.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Well you may be interested to know that Feigenbaum served in the Prussian Army and fought at The Battle of Gravelotte in 1870.
    Last edited by Trevor Marriott; 01-22-2012, 02:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • K-453
    replied
    I quite agree with Hunter.

    For someone with serial killer tendencies, being a soldier could even be an occasion to live out some fantasies - to go man-hunting ...

    Originally posted by curious4 View Post
    entrails over the right shoulder
    More likely than being arranged there, the entrails were just flung aside while Jack was digging for the thing he wanted.
    The right shoulder and above are just the place were they land when someone kneeling next to the waist of the victim throws them aside. It looks like he did not want to get them between his feet, so he threw them into the direction of the victim's head.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hunter
    replied
    There were a lot of people- including healthy young men who didn't serve and the politicians who sent him to the battlefield - walking around in perfect freedom. There seems to be some other reason for the direct targeting of the female characteristics of most of these women.

    However, knowing a quick method of dispatch of the victim, the ruthlessness in ending someone's life and the acceptance and the excitement of danger on the killer's part could be indicative of the military experience of someone who's mind was troubled in other ways.

    We'll never really know for sure... Lots of theories and lots of possibilities.

    Leave a comment:


  • curious4
    started a topic Soldier Jack?

    Soldier Jack?

    Hello again all,

    I wonder if perhaps JTR could have been a soldier suffering from Post Traumatic Stress - something not recognised at the time. A veteran, perhaps of the Zulu War of 1879, who had seen his comrades cut to pieces, body parts strewn over the battlefield and who had come home angry to find that "whores" were walking the street in perfect freedom, while his mates had been left behind, dead and in pieces.

    I wonder if the ritualistic placing of body parts was some attempt to make order of what was, to him, chaos. Chapman, entrails over the right shoulder, same thing with Eddowes, but with a piece of intestine between the left arm and the body and the same thing on the left side of MJK, between the body and arm (the thing at the top is NOT a sleeve but a body part, clearly attached to the piece of intestine, a chemise was either armless or with a small "cap" sleeve similar to the sleeves on girlsī dresses in the 1950s). Also with MJK perhaps significant body parts placed under and round the body.

    There you have it - perhaps and idea to toy with.

    Best wishes,
    C4

    "Read not to contradict and refute, nor to believe and take for granted.... but to weigh and consider" Lord Bacon
Working...
X