Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Have Ripperologists Been Polled As To Who They Think Jack Really Was?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi All,

    The reason Jack the Ripper has not been identified is because he didn't exist.

    Which makes a poll somewhat redundant.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Mary Kelly's suicide is the strangest thing that i have ever read about.
    SCORPIO

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
      Hi Jon,

      Nicely played.

      Regards,

      Simon
      Thank you, Simon.

      Comment


      • #48
        I must say, the idea of 2, 3, 4 or 5 murderers who commit one or more savage murders at the same time, and then retire at the same time, seems a bit bizarre.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
          The difference, if that is what you are looking for, is that Mrs Long saw Chapman's face and recognised her as the woman in the mortuary..

          "I saw the woman's face. Have seen the deceased in the mortuary, and I am sure the woman that I saw in Hanbury-street was the deceased."

          Lawende could not offer the same assurance, he only "thought" the clothes he was shown looked like those which the woman was wearing. And as many of these women dressed in very similar dark attire, Lawende's is not a reliable sighting.

          It is purely personal preference which keeps Lawende's sighting in the forefront.

          Regards, Jon S.
          yes i know and this is a crucial sighting..... over 40 and foreign looking blimey!!!!!

          foreign looking is ok, it's the over 40, i really dont know what to say about this, because i can guarantee you that due to this late/ early hour, that this is definitely her killer, because it would be totally fluke for him to walk off and the real JTR to come along within 5 mins of this...... especially with her saying YES i'll have sex with you !

          this is what could have happened with regards to BROAD SHOULDERS and later on with Eddowes too..... but not her, this suspect is JTR, or another killer

          what about GH ?..... HE'S NOT QUITE CONVINCING ENOUGH, not with this, plus many other niggling doubts too.

          FINALLY, there isn't any other suspect on this website right now that's any good either, they're all ``fall guys`` or non-starters.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Robert View Post
            I must say, the idea of 2, 3, 4 or 5 murderers who commit one or more savage murders at the same time, and then retire at the same time, seems a bit bizarre.
            YUP, but also not to kill anywhere else in the world as well, this killer either died, downgraded and thus switched his M.O, or he finished what he set out to do.

            it looks like he achieved his goal and then stopped and downgraded, as well as leaving, because history cant lie about this and as such, this must be a huge clue.

            he seems quite unpopular, but it doesn't half make G.Chapman look as guilty as hell, because he fits exactly what we cant dismiss lightly and what we cant ignore !

            1..... he visits here..... loads of murders
            2..... he is seen too well...... stops, downgrades and leaves
            3......he waits some time, returns to this area and starts killing again, this time with a different M.O

            he is everything that GH isn't, ....i.e what GH should have done after MJK, is everything that G.Chapman did.

            but it's hard to match G.C to these crimes, especially Chapman's simply because this bloke seen is over 40 !..... so it's all a wee bit hit, miss and maybe!

            in fact GC doesn't fit any of these murders, except the last, that is if GH is telling the truth..... SORRY HE AINT, so he fits none of the murders, but neither does Tumblety, D'Onston, Druitt and definitely not KOSMINSKI , so i guess he's no worst than any of the rest
            Last edited by Malcolm X; 12-11-2011, 06:59 PM.

            Comment


            • #51
              Hi Robert,

              "Jack" retired because he had served his purpose.

              Regards,

              Simon
              Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

              Comment


              • #52
                [QUOTE=Malcolm X;200778]
                yes i know and this is a crucial sighting..... over 40 and foreign looking blimey!!!!!

                foreign looking is ok, it's the over 40, i really dont know what to say about this, because i can guarantee you that due to this late/ early hour, that this is definitely her killer, because it would be totally fluke for him to walk off and the real JTR to come along within 5 mins of this...... especially with her saying YES i'll have sex with you !
                Yes, it's the "over 40" that bothers me too...maybe she changed her mind because of this ?
                Last edited by Rubyretro; 12-11-2011, 07:05 PM.
                http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

                Comment


                • #53
                  hat trick

                  Hello Simon. Hmm, California has not been described as the cereal state for no reason.

                  So, from cereal state to serial killer, but without a surreal explanation.

                  Cheers.
                  LC

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    take care; be warned

                    Hello Malcolm. You are asking ALL the right questions. Stop soon or you may end up like Simon and me.

                    Cheers.
                    LC

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Malcolm X View Post
                      yes i know and this is a crucial sighting..... over 40 and foreign looking blimey!!!!!

                      foreign looking is ok, it's the over 40, i really dont know what to say about this,...
                      But "over 40" is not a certainty, read Long's words (again).
                      "... I did not see the man's face, but I noticed that he was dark. He was wearing a brown low-crowned felt hat. I think he had on a dark coat, though I am not certain. By the look of him he seemed to me a man over forty years of age."

                      How do you determine a mans age from behind?
                      Did she assume his age due to his mode of dress?

                      Remember what Sarah Lewis said?
                      "-- he was short, pale faced, with a black small moustache, about 40 years of age

                      Chapman was about 5ft tall, and Mrs Long said the man was "a little taller", so anywhere between 5' 2" & 5' 6" might be reasonable and still considered short.

                      A mans age can be anywhere between 35 & 45 and still be consistent with much of the evidence given by several witnesses.
                      Determining accurate height & age is a precarious undertaking at the best of times.

                      Regards, Jon S.
                      Last edited by Wickerman; 12-11-2011, 08:41 PM.
                      Regards, Jon S.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Hi Wickerman,

                        Look on the bright side.

                        At least Lewis and Long's sightings rule out the 55-year-old 6'2" Tumblety.

                        Regards,

                        Simon
                        Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
                          Hi Monty,

                          Actually, common sense is a concept most alien to Luddites and Flat Earthists.

                          Have a safe, warm Christmas and a very happy New Year.

                          Regards,

                          Simon
                          Hello Simon,

                          Having left my flat cap and clogs at' mill..

                          The product 'Jack' fell off the wagon as soon as all the top policemen started revealing they didnt and couldnt show agreement. And the Luddite Ripper community make up all sorts of explanations for that. Whilst asking us to first believe the honesty of one then another, according to what single piece of writing they pick out.

                          The Flat Earth society are known to be blinkered. Some see a Stonefish. Others stick to a traditonal goldfish. By the by- it is highly unusual for even the plainest of fish not to smell.
                          Blinkers in Ripperology are amazing- they cover the eyes and the nose- whilst some put fingers in their ears singing ' I dont want to hear you'.
                          Its not to their taste either. Perhaps they have the wrong grip? 5 senses down still screaming we koow better. The Earth CANNOT be round. 'We know'.

                          best wishes

                          Phil
                          Last edited by Phil Carter; 12-11-2011, 09:28 PM.
                          Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


                          Justice for the 96 = achieved
                          Accountability? ....

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
                            Hi Monty,

                            Actually, common sense is a concept most alien to Luddites and Flat Earthists.

                            Have a safe, warm Christmas and a very happy New Year.

                            Regards,

                            Simon
                            Hi Simon,

                            As Ned and I share the same home village I feel a tad more qualified to comment on Luddites than some.

                            For example the framesmashers were NOT against modern technology but the unfair employment laws of the time.

                            This is my point. You fantasists are too busy working on conspiracy, thinking of cute things to say in your clogs and flat caps that you completely and utterly miss the facts and reality of the situation.

                            It also seems to me that a few of your followers are a little too close behind you, their heads are so far up your posterior its cutting the flow of blood to their brains, thus rendering that organ completely helpless.

                            Thank heaven for the feeble minded, for they shall be easily led by lack of evidence and fact.

                            Oh, and sincere Christmas wishes to you and yours Simon. Whatever our views, they are merely that and in the grand scheme mean nothing.

                            Monty
                            Monty

                            https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

                            Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

                            http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Monty View Post
                              This is my point. You fantasists are too busy working on conspiracy, thinking of cute things to say in your clogs and flat caps that you completely and utterly miss the facts and reality of the situation.

                              It also seems to me that a few of your followers are a little too close behind you, their heads are so far up your posterior its cutting the flow of blood to their brains, thus rendering that organ completely helpless.

                              Thank heaven for the feeble minded, for they shall be easily led by lack of evidence and fact.
                              Monty
                              Hello all,

                              And here we have a prime example of those who claim to 'know better' showing the capacity of linguistic ability of reasonable considered opinion, with knowledge through the intelligent word,

                              Note the intended 'C' word. When all else is failing, fall back on that. Tarred again. Shame.

                              I wasnt aware that Simon had followers? I would have thought that particular epithet tars only those belonging to the sheepish community saying baaa. Or at this time of year, Bah humbug!
                              It is not we round earthists who play follow the leader. (Believe! Jack the Ripper killed 5 women!) well, some very knowledgeable authors say no to that, some question both Stride and Kelly.

                              It doesnt matter what equipment one uses from what age. The point still remains the same. The Earth is not flat as some still insist.

                              Best wishes

                              Phil
                              Last edited by Phil Carter; 12-11-2011, 10:47 PM.
                              Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


                              Justice for the 96 = achieved
                              Accountability? ....

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Keep droning Phil,

                                The evidence is there for all to see and form opinions upon.

                                I prefer the 'E' word. Something that Simon has failed to provide for some number of years now.

                                Now you can belittle, the facts speak for themselves. However the facts do not sit right in your world. So you twist words and intentions and manufacture theory, dress it as 'high probability' and parade it before the mass audience as any self promoting Illusionist does.

                                I don't claim to know better. Never did. That was yet another falsity put forward by you. I just counter and point out the evidence. You couldn't deal with that so labelled me arrogant and big headed. If your arguements stood by themseves then you wouldn't have needed to turn to personal attacks here and behind the boards.

                                Again, as you seem to be confused, the Luddite reference was to point out the inaccuracies Simon and yourself use to promote a false representation of events or person.

                                Keep coming up with the cute insults, it only shows you really have nothing in the fact and evidence locker.

                                Monty
                                Monty

                                https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

                                Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

                                http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X