Decision

[GUT]

Yes, and more.

Pierre

Names the killer, but not a suspect book.

More Pierre BS

[Elamarna]

In the case of no interruption, she definitely wasn't a Ripper victim.

John,

while I agree if there was no interruption, it seems hard to count her in; lets wait and see what evidence is presented, at that stage we can analysis what is actually presented and see if it stands up to scrutiny, rather than trying to analysis individual comments.

And if the book never appears, we need not be concerned. such as the Van Goth one.


steve

[Elamarna]

Yes, and more.

Pierre

Many thanks the comment about not a suspect book was the reason I asked, i suspect that is more to do with terminology than anything else.

[John G]

Those who think Coles is more likely than Stride I believe do so when they have evidence for Coles being likely.

I have no sources for Coles so I therefore exclude Coles.

In the case of Stride I have never said that there was an interruption.

Pierre

In the case of no interruption, she definitely wasn't a Ripper victim.

[Pierre]

Pierre

Simply question, will the book name a potential killer?

Steve

Yes, and more.

Pierre

[Pierre]

Why is Coles less likely than Stride, considering they suffered similar neck injuries? And we definitively know Coles' perpetrator was interrupted, unlike Stride's.

Those who think Coles is more likely than Stride I believe do so when they have evidence for Coles being likely.

I have no sources for Coles so I therefore exclude Coles.

In the case of Stride I have never said that there was an interruption.

Pierre

[Elamarna]

I guess if he does write a book, which I really doubt will ever happen, we will have a name and be able to check on his famed academic qualifications probably yet another reason I doubt we will ever see this book

assuming he does write a book, why do we assume he would do it under his full name? he may just use a pen name--- Pierre.


Steve

[Elamarna]

Up thread he told Pat it wouldn't be a suspect book.

But then he also previously said he wasn't going to write a book.

Indeed, but i was under the impression from shall we say "private information" (shades of the memorandum) that a name would be provided, having read the reply to Pat, i was asking for clarification from Pierre.


Steve

[GUT]

I guess if he does write a book, which I really doubt will ever happen, we will have a name and be able to check on his famed academic qualifications probably yet another reason I doubt we will ever see this book

[John G]

Not at all John, just want to know now if a name will finally be given.

Steve

He can't ever afford to name his suspect, Steve, because that would expose the weakness of his theory.

[GUT]

Not at all John, just want to know now if a name will finally be given.

Steve

Up thread he told Pat it wouldn't be a suspect book.

But then he also previously said he wasn't going to write a book.

[Elamarna]

I have to say, I do admire your optimism, Steve.

Not at all John, just want to know now if a name will finally be given.

Steve

[John G]

Pierre

Simply question, will the book name a potential killer?

Steve

I have to say, I do admire your optimism, Steve.

[Elamarna]

Hi Pcdunn,

that is correct. It will not be such a book.

Pierre

Pierre

Simply question, will the book name a potential killer?

Steve

[John G]

Hi Herlock,

No Tabram or Coles since there is no evidence for Tabram or Coles.

As for interpretation of sources, that will be very limited.

Pierre

Why is Coles less likely than Stride, considering they suffered similar neck injuries? And we definitively know Coles' perpetrator was interrupted, unlike Stride's.