A major breakthrough

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    You set up conditions for my answers, David.

    You first give a set of conditions and then demand yes or no.
    Such nonsense Pierre. I didn't set up any "conditions" nor have I demanded a yes or no answer. I have simply asked you a question and I note that you have evaded that question once more.

    So you force me to draw my own conclusion.

    To the extent that anything you have told us in this thread is true, my conclusion is that you were actively seeking information about the inquest of your suspect so that you were expecting and hoping to obtain medical information relating to the cause of death. I'm not convinced that this hasn't been obtained from the British Newspaper Archive, due to your mention of "the archive", but if you actually did visit an archive in person it was to consult the inquest and post mortem records.

    Leave a comment:


  • MsWeatherwax
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post



    Are you accusing me? If that is the case, please stop.
    I have reached a conclusion based on what I have seen and read so far. If I am wrong, then I will apologise unreservedly. If that is the case I'm sure your research will speak for itself.
    Last edited by MsWeatherwax; 09-24-2016, 01:10 PM. Reason: Fixed quote tags

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    [QUOTE=MsWeatherwax;393521]

    I mean that your entire 'hypothesis' has been open to question from the start, and you've just quoted a well known internet meme that originated on a website that is very also very well known for trolling other websites.
    Are you accusing me? If that is the case, please stop.

    If you're genuine, good luck to you and I look forward to reading the inevitable book. If you're not, then congratulations. You've inspired some very interesting discussions that are interesting.
    Well, of course I am what you call "genuine". I am different from many others.

    I'm out. Good luck to David and Elamarna if they choose to continue to entertain this - your rebuttals have been infinitely more useful and interesting than the source material.
    OK.

    Leave a comment:


  • MsWeatherwax
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    What do you mean?
    I mean that your entire 'hypothesis' has been open to question from the start, and you've just quoted a well known internet meme that originated on a website that is very also very well known for trolling other websites.

    If you're genuine, good luck to you and I look forward to reading the inevitable book. If you're not, then congratulations. You've inspired some very interesting discussions that are interesting.

    I'm out. Good luck to David and Elamarna if they choose to continue to entertain this - your rebuttals have been infinitely more useful and interesting than the source material.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by MsWeatherwax View Post
    Interesting discussions is interesting. OK, fair play Pierre - now I know I've been had.

    Give my regards to Reddit.
    What do you mean?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X