[QUOTE=David Orsam;395498]
I donīt want to accuse Scotland Yard for having protected Jack the Ripper.
I donīt want to tell the descendants of the victims that the killer was someone who was supposed to protect people.
I donīt want to destroy this little field of ripperology.
I donīt want to write a book about the case.
I donīt want to spent the rest of my life with this.
And still, you put words into my mouth.
Of course. That was the first hypothesis I got.
But that is a fact. See above.
I am spending time on this and the time spent may lead to the above points. That is my problem.
You keep saying that but it isn't true. You desperately want to be right.
I donīt want to tell the descendants of the victims that the killer was someone who was supposed to protect people.
I donīt want to destroy this little field of ripperology.
I donīt want to write a book about the case.
I donīt want to spent the rest of my life with this.
And still, you put words into my mouth.
As soon as you thought your suspect had a mental problem you announced that Jack the Ripper had a mental problem.
But now you pretend that if your suspect had a mental problem he couldn't have been Jack the Ripper; and, oh, you would have loved it so that you could abandon this madness and go back to your "normal life". But that wouldn't have happened for one second.
If you are fooling anyone Pierre it's only yourself.
Comment