WH Bury Problems

[John Wheat]

Its laughable to read such an argument from a Bury supporter, Ellen's neck hadn't even been cut nor stabbed!

Did the Ripper use strangulation against Kelly or Eddows ?!

Did the Ripper use a rope against any of his victims ?!

And you say you are not sewing a scinario ?!

You turned the Ripper into a Chocker !!


Rainbow°

Yes the Ripper did use strangulation against Kelly and Endows. Do some research.

There is evidence the Ripper used ligature in several of the C5.

[Fisherman]

You're never correct.

I am ever so often, John. But it takes a discerning mind to realize it.

Have you noticed how we are discussing "ripperology" the way you want it again? No facts, no intelligent debate, no moving the case forward.

Just gutter level threats of beating me up if you get the chance.

You are really making SUCH a good case for Bury.

Goodnight, John. Til the next time, eh?

[Pierre]

Annoyed? YouŽd wish. I am enjoying the many opportunitites you provide me with to show how I am correct.

Random posters should really not talk about random witnesses, if they are unable to tell random witnesses apart from witnesses caught of the spot with freshly killed murder victims. Such witnesses can never be random.
Random people are uninteresting, bland people, with nothing extra to offer.

IŽm sure you catch my drift.

I know that you want to trash the Lechmere theory and hurt it in any way you could. And this may sound odd to you, but the best you can do is to keep quiet. Whenever you miss the opportunity to clam up, you do yourself a great disservice.
And that was not what you aimed for, was it?

Bury killed his wife. There is a motive explanation for that.

Lechmere found Polly Nichols. There is a causal explanation for that.

There are no sources connecting Bury or Lechmere to the murders in London 1888-1889. There are no motive explanations. There is nothing.

Bury did not have the signature and he did not have the modus operandi. Nichols was found on LechmereŽs way to work.

[Rainbow]

No but McKenzies Killer stabbed the throat rather than used strangulation.

Its laughable to read such an argument from a Bury supporter, Ellen's neck hadn't even been cut nor stabbed!

Did the Ripper use strangulation against Kelly or Eddows ?!

Did the Ripper use a rope against any of his victims ?!

And you say you are not sewing a scinario ?!

You turned the Ripper into a Chocker !!


Rainbow°

[John Wheat]

Elaborate, please, John.

Why???

[John Wheat]

Annoyed? YouŽd wish. I am enjoying the many opportunitites you provide me with to show how I am correct.

Random posters should really not talk about random witnesses, if they are unable to tell random witnesses apart from witnesses caught of the spot with freshly killed murder victims. Such witnesses can never be random.
Random people are uninteresting, bland people, with nothing extra to offer.

IŽm sure you catch my drift.

I know that you want to trash the Lechmere theory and hurt it in any way you could. And this may sound odd to you, but the best you can do is to keep quiet. Whenever you miss the opportunity to clam up, you do yourself a great disservice.
And that was not what you aimed for, was it?

You're never correct.

[Fisherman]

To assassinate someone's character, don't they have to have character in the first place?

Yes, exactly. Well done.

[Fisherman]

God help you if you ever meet certain people.

Elaborate, please, John.

[Fisherman]

You're joking right? A random witness is not a better suspect than Bury. It's strange how many people disagree with you. And funny how annoyed you get when they do.

Annoyed? YouŽd wish. I am enjoying the many opportunitites you provide me with to show how I am correct.

Random posters should really not talk about random witnesses, if they are unable to tell random witnesses apart from witnesses caught of the spot with freshly killed murder victims. Such witnesses can never be random.
Random people are uninteresting, bland people, with nothing extra to offer.

IŽm sure you catch my drift.

I know that you want to trash the Lechmere theory and hurt it in any way you could. And this may sound odd to you, but the best you can do is to keep quiet. Whenever you miss the opportunity to clam up, you do yourself a great disservice.
And that was not what you aimed for, was it?

[John Wheat]

YouŽd just sucker punch yourself, John. DonŽt even think about it.

God help you if you ever meet certain people.

[John Wheat]

Oh, how SUBTLE you are, John!

I am also a transvestite-hater and a good many other derogatory things, donŽtŽcha know? WHy, I even dislike rabbits! And I have actually shot a number of rats dead in my days, with an air rifle, murderous bastard that I am, picking on helpless rats.
Not that all of this changes the fact that Bury is a bad bid and Lechmere a very good one for the killerŽs role. But since you have obviously long ago abandoned the hope of salvaging your theory and instead opted for a measly attempt at character assassination (more of your home turf, perhaps?), I thought IŽd might as well help you along a little with that part.

So that you can have a little something that goes your way for a change. Go on, John!

To assassinate someone's character, don't they have to have character in the first place?

[John Wheat]

YouŽd just sucker punch yourself, John. DonŽt even think about it.

Whatever.

[Fisherman]

Yeah because every football hooligan answers posts by morons that are beneath them.

Anyway if I am a football hooligan I suggest you back off. Football hooligans tend to have no problem with extreme violence.

YouŽd just sucker punch yourself, John. DonŽt even think about it.

[John Wheat]

I have pointed out that you behave like a football hooligan. You do.

I have pointed out that you prefer to attack me on a personal level to discussing the case facts. You do.

There, dealt with.

If Bury and Lechmere were stood side by side before the police, and if the police were told that Bury had killed his wife and cut her stomach open, whilst there was no information about Lechmere having performed any criminal act, the police would ask "So what is Mr Lechmere doing here?", and they would think that Bury was the best bet.
Once they learned that Bury could not be proven to have been anywhere near any of the murder sites, whereas Lechmere was found alone with one of the victims, the blood running from her neck and pooling on the ground, they would ask Bury to leave and not interfere with the investigation.

You cannot understand this. Fair enough. Not everybody is cut out to comprehend more complex matters. And those who canŽt would do well not to use words as "laughable" and "bullshit", since it reflects badly on themselves.

You're joking right? A random witness is not a better suspect than Bury. It's strange how many people disagree with you. And funny how annoyed you get when they do.

[John Wheat]

I have pointed out that you behave like a football hooligan. You do.

I have pointed out that you prefer to attack me on a personal level to discussing the case facts. You do.

There, dealt with.

Yeah because every football hooligan answers posts by morons that are beneath them.

Anyway if I am a football hooligan I suggest you back off. Football hooligans tend to have no problem with extreme violence.