Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Emma Smith - where exactly?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by DGB
    The Goad map of the western side of Brick Ln, between Wentworth and Thrawl Streets, gives the yard between Taylor's and No 7 as being an opening with a 'passage under' it would seem therefore to be a covered entrance - the gate is pure conjecture on behalf, imagining that it is a loading bay or some such for the factory.
    Hi David, that's very useful information and a very keen observation on your part. Thanks. Is there a scan of this on this or another thread where it has this info?

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Surely the Goad Map quoted via the link to Rob Clack's posting?

    All the best

    Dave
    Last edited by Cogidubnus; 04-09-2012, 12:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DGB
    replied
    Hi Tom

    The Goad map of the western side of Brick Ln, between Wentworth and Thrawl Streets, gives the yard between Taylor's and No 7 as being an opening with a 'passage under' it would seem therefore to be a covered entrance - the gate is pure conjecture on behalf, imagining that it is a loading bay or some such for the factory.

    Cheers

    DavidB

    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    Hi all,

    Regarding the mention of 'covered entrance' in some of the above posts. What's the source for that?

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Hi all,

    Regarding the mention of 'covered entrance' in some of the above posts. What's the source for that?

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Clack
    replied
    Originally posted by Debra A View Post
    Thanks, Rob. I guess that's why maybe some placed the attack on the corner then?
    Yes it probably is. All the reports are a bit vague. I presume her route to her lodgings would have been up Brick Lane and a left into Thrawl Street as that would be the route she took from her Lodgings to London Hospital. If Reid's report is anything to go by.

    Rob

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by Rob Clack View Post
    Hi Debs,

    There was renumbering between the 1881 and 1891 census. The numbering changed from continuous to odds and evens, so that's probably why.

    Rob

    Thanks, Rob. I guess that's why maybe some placed the attack on the corner then?

    Leave a comment:


  • DGB
    replied
    Thanks Rob

    The seeming absence of houses, (not to mention the big 'E' on the OS map) made things difficult, so it's good to have that sorted.

    I assume the covered entrance was to a loading yard of some such, used by the factory. I imagine it was gated, which is of interest considering Nichols, Stride and Eddowes, even if it's unlikely that Emma Smith was a Ripper victim.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    The covered yard referred to by other posters bears a passing resemblance to a larger version of Millers Court, but without the small area immediately outside the window of No.13.

    Regards, Bridewell.
    Last edited by Bridewell; 04-08-2012, 04:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Thanks for that Rob...she was even closer to home than we thought then

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Clack
    replied
    Originally posted by Debra A View Post
    Until the expert arrives; I don't know if this means anything (and I could be saying something embarassingly stupid here as maps really aren't my thing!) but in the 1881 census #10 Brick Lane appears immediately before #1Montague Street, but not in 1891.
    Hi Debs,

    There was renumbering between the 1881 and 1891 census. The numbering changed from continuous to odds and evens, so that's probably why.

    Rob

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Clack
    replied
    This is where number 10 Brick Lane was.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	10 Brick Lane.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	111.3 KB
ID:	663560

    Rob

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Until the expert arrives; I don't know if this means anything (and I could be saying something embarassingly stupid here as maps really aren't my thing!) but in the 1881 census #10 Brick Lane appears immediately before #1Montague Street, but not in 1891.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Doesnt answer the question however....

    .....some may find it interesting.

    http://forum.casebook.org/showthread...450#post215450

    Monty


    PS, I'll BBM Rob to see if he is available to answer this query....though he may tell me to s*d orf

    Leave a comment:


  • DGB
    replied
    Thanks Dave that's excellent.

    I'll contact Rob to see if he has the other side of Brick Ln. It does confirm a couple of things:

    No 11 is on the corner, and as there's an 11 and an 11a in Simon's list, the dotted line I included on my sketch was definitely there in 1888.

    Also, checking the Goad key for what the entryway between Taylor's and No 7 is, it's given as 'passage under' suggesting there was a tunnel/passage of some type.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Talking of Goad maps, I was looking at an old thread on here and it appears Rob Clack may have one....

    http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=324&page=5

    Tantalisingly we see here half of Brick Lane on post #47

    Dave

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X