A Working Hypothesis

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Scorpio
    replied
    You Gotta Pick A Pocket Or Twooooahhh!

    Errata, we know from Hutchinson that Jack is a man who posseses a degree of sartorial elegance and i doubt he would dirty that sharp astrakan sleeved coat with blood and faeces. What the hell would you tell the dry cleaner?. No, i think some recepticle must have been utilised.

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    Ok, it never occured to me before, but it is profoundly disturbing to picture a man who plans to take away enough souvenirs from his victim that he requires luggage. Me, I'd put it in my pocket. It's probably safe there, and if I got pickpocketed, the theif would be easy to find through the intensive therapy he would require after going for a wallet and coming away with a uterus.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    John Douglas states that serial murderers will often seek satisfaction or gain inspiration through some alternate means which would include employment. The presence of the London Hospital which would have employed a number of blue collar staff, and i would categorise JtR within this group,deserves more attention than it seems to recieve. Employment in such an environment would have provided a physical/psychological goldmine for a disturbed mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    I would guess he crouched somewhere near the victims head. The uterus was also a favourite target for Andrei Chikitilo, the Rostov ripper. He, ironically enough, probably hid the human material in a leather " Gladstone" style bag, which he was carrying at the time of his arrest and contained various unsavoury items.

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    Originally posted by Scorpio View Post
    I can't help but notice how many people seriously consider the possibility of JtR roaming the streets covered in blood. With the possible exception of Martha Tabram, who was stabbed multiple times, a physical process that Forensic scientists would associate with the generation of multiple,flying blood droplets that are transmitted from the weapon to the assailants skin,hair and clothing. The infamous " ripping", is a cutting or slicing motion, and that is a process which skilled butchers and slaughterers can accomplish without becoming particularly bloodstained. If Jack was such a skilled working man,then it is likely that the blood was confined to the fingernails, sleeves, shoes and trouser bottoms, or pant bottoms if your an American.
    I never really pictured it like he bathed in it or anything. I suppose it all depends on whether he was crouching, kneeling or sitting, but there weren't bloody footprints, kneeprints, or butt prints so I dont know which. Cutting out intestines and chucking them to one side is a messy business. Of course, if he had a bloody uterus in his hand on the way home, that seems kind of noticeable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    A Clean Pair Of Heels ?

    I can't help but notice how many people seriously consider the possibility of JtR roaming the streets covered in blood. With the possible exception of Martha Tabram, who was stabbed multiple times, a physical process that Forensic scientists would associate with the generation of multiple,flying blood droplets that are transmitted from the weapon to the assailants skin,hair and clothing. The infamous " ripping", is a cutting or slicing motion, and that is a process which skilled butchers and slaughterers can accomplish without becoming paticularly bloodstained. If Jack was such a skilled working man,then it is likely that the blood was confined to the fingernails, sleeves, shoes and trouser bottoms, or pant bottoms if your an American.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    I am glad somebody knows what they are talking about.... but i am sure there is a suspect called William somewhere, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Graham
    replied
    Originally posted by Scorpio View Post
    Errata, a man called William Sadler, who was briefly a suspect, reported that he was beaten and robbed, when he was in the area during the Frances Coles murder. So, you may be right yet.
    No big deal, but it was James Sadler and he was a client of Frances Coles, having picked her up in a pub the night before she was murdered. Sadler was mugged (or at least beaten up) and Frances left him to it; he went to her lodging-house at Whites Row and they had a shouting match. Later that night he was beaten up again, and subsequently arrested.

    Graham

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    Errata, a man called William Sadler, who was briefly a suspect, reported that he was beaten and robbed, when he was in the area during the Frances Coles murder. So, you may be right yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    Originally posted by Scorpio View Post
    Hi Errata
    I think the mugger would have gone for the bewildered middle-class slummer instead. I think worker/commuter Jack may have supplemented his local geographic knowledge with the aid of some helpfull local ladies pre Martha Tabram. The murder dates were mostly weekend affairs i think, there was always someone around to help a fellow spend his wages.
    Paul
    Im still in favor of the drunken balladeer method of exit. And there were a lot of helpful ladies. There were also a lot of very helpful gangs, robbers, pimps, drunks and thieves. Middle class slummer puts a big fat target on his back for those guys. Especially if it was true. I can just picture him getting grabbed by a thug, and having the big strong burly tough realize that the coat collar he just grabbed is soaked in blood. Just because you can butcher prostitutes doesn't mean you can protect yourself from a mugger. Odd but true.

    Leave a comment:


  • protohistorian
    replied
    Scorpio that is correct, it can. The best we can do is evaluate what we do have and eliminate possibilities by their violations of established fact. Even then, because so many within this community would argue the sky is red just to flap their gums, their will be no consensus. This is not entirely bad, because our dataset is so subjective that the reality is every ripper scholar has to find his own solution.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    I agree, the marauder model seems to arbitary to me. The idea of a comfort zone is plausible, people do like to go with, and stay with, what they know, rather than take risks, but it still suggests a cognitive relationship and that can be established in so many ways.
    Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • protohistorian
    replied
    Scorpio, I do not think many take the geography lightly as it regards this case. The bulk of studies from other types of crime bear out offender occupancy in the space shared by defining points. Modern studies of murderers differ slightly as they are complicated by wholesale offender relocation to avoid detection. I would not go so far as saying the crimes bound the area of suspect residence. I would say that at the very least they define a known zone of comfort for the offender. Could the comfort zone be larger? Why yes,yes it could. Why do we define it by victim recovery site? Because it is a known set of parameters to go by. This is particularly true if you believe the M5 is an accurate grouping.In very simple terms, if you are going to expand the comfort zone, what are the criteria for doing so? Do we say a 20 minute walk? Why 20 minutes? I do not have much faith in the Macnaghten grouping methodologically speaking, but it is the historically established grouping. We do not have enough data to expand the grouping. Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    Hi Errata
    I think the mugger would have gone for the bewildered middle-class slummer instead. I think worker/commuter Jack may have supplemented his local geographic knowledge with the aid of some helpfull local ladies pre Martha Tabram. The murder dates were mostly weekend affairs i think, there was always someone around to help a fellow spend his wages.
    Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    I think my question would be along these lines.

    Who would be living outside Whitechapel, working or commuting within Whitechapel, and have the knowledge of the alleys and yards. A coach driver would know the streets, but not the yards. A delivery person would know the streets yards and alleys, but is unlikely to live outside the neighborhood. A ahh... sex worker enthusiast would know the main drags and surrounds, but little else. A lamplighter would know the area, but would live in it. A gas man is a possibility. As is a priest I suppose. But a gas man would probably be unable to navigate around the gangs, and a priest would be recognizable. It's not impossible, I just cant imagine what job would meet the criteria, without him living in the area.

    I have always cherished a secret fantasy that Jack the Ripper stopped killing because he got knifed by a mugger. That's how I like my irony.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X