Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Swanson Family Tradition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Originally posted by Canucco dei Mergi View Post
    Thank you of the advice my friend but as I have told you, I have more than 'a case to put forward'.
    It needs more than a dissertation or a thread.
    These are good for people who have not a lot to say but a lot to defend.
    It needs a contractual structure.

    I know that I do not need any permission my friend, I repeat, I need a contractual structure.

    Nobody compels somebody to give it. Peace. I had to ask to know.
    Looney Tunes?

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    I know that I do not need any permission my friend, I repeat, I need a contractual structure.

    In other words, "show me the money."

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Canucco dei Mergi
    replied
    Originally posted by Bailey View Post
    Canucco,

    I'm perfectly sure that if you have a case to put forward and write it out as a dissertation and send it, Casebook would be happy to publish it.

    And even aside from that, you have every right to start a thread explaining your case - you need no permission, nothing more than the time it takes to write the post.
    Thank you of the advice my friend but as I have told you, I have more than 'a case to put forward'.
    It needs more than a dissertation or a thread.
    These are good for people who have not a lot to say but a lot to defend.
    It needs a contractual structure.

    I know that I do not need any permission my friend, I repeat, I need a contractual structure.

    Nobody compels somebody to give it. Peace. I had to ask to know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi C.D.,

    Good to know that the USA has such a command of the English language.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Originally posted by Cap'n Jack View Post
    I'm damned sure I heard the satisfying clunk of a Samsonite briefcase just then.
    Oh sh*t, you just beat me to it, AP.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Here in the good ole U.S. of A we have an expression --"letting your mouth write a check your ass can't cash."

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Cap'n Jack,

    There is no Samsonite suitcase big enough to contain £75.00 in Italian currency.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Bailey
    replied
    Canucco,

    I'm perfectly sure that if you have a case to put forward and write it out as a dissertation and send it, Casebook would be happy to publish it.

    And even aside from that, you have every right to start a thread explaining your case - you need no permission, nothing more than the time it takes to write the post.

    If you have a theory, I for one would like to hear it. However, all this hinting and suchlike merely makes you look foolish.

    And I don't think your nationality is at all relevant - they let Australians in here, for goodness sake.

    B. (Of some Italian descent myself)

    Leave a comment:


  • Cap'n Jack
    replied
    I'm damned sure I heard the satisfying clunk of a Samsonite briefcase just then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Canucco Dei Mergi,

    You either know something about which we lesser mortals are ignorant, or you are full of sh*t.

    As a gesture of good faith, please provide one example of something which history has got wrong about Jack the Ripper.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Canucco dei Mergi
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post
    Hi Cannuco,

    May I inquire as to whether you asked the administrators of this site for something in exchange for your information?

    c.d.
    No.
    Indeed I offered them.
    Not only the solution of the case but all of the rest: "what is good for me will be good for you".

    If today I would agree to speak it is because of money and nothing else.
    Butnot your money.
    I am not interested in fame and glory and indeed I even would like not to get the limelight.

    But the solution of the case deserves better than that.
    So I give it to you (all of it) and we split the rest.
    If you are capable to get the rest (this would be your job).

    A last point.
    If I speak about the 'solution' and about 'money' the two things must not be confused as cause and consequence.
    Coincidentally, the two things might be reunited, but the need of one has not been the cause of the birth of the other.

    Hope that my scant english is not source of confusion here.

    Anyway, if you need more, ask, I will give.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Hi Cannuco,

    May I inquire as to whether you asked the administrators of this site for something in exchange for your information?

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Canucco dei Mergi
    replied
    I can't do more than propose to the administration of this site - as I did and told you I did, so why you go on saying that I must do it ? - to reveal what this affair was about, from the beginning to the end.

    But if I can only but propose, the others must accept the proposal.

    And who among the talented - really meaning it - boarders here present could even accept the idea to be told the solution by an unknown italian ?

    Who among them could even think such a thing (a shame ? a scandal ? an insult ?) feasible and possible ?

    This I certainly understand.

    That's why I underlined to the administrators of this site that I don't need my name to be put forward.

    I don't know what I can do more.

    If my intervention shake the earth under the Ripper community, if my innocent and generous proposal of contribution raise some fear that what has been built up to today could become in peril and that this would not be acceptable, this I could also understand.

    But to believe that I am here to tell you that if you allow me to put a word in the affair I will explain you what happened in Whitechapel in 1888 just because I like to lose my time and your kind patience, it is, we should agree less than credible.

    Not to speak about the aim of raising my intelligence above the others since I am the first to say that what I know it is certainly not due to any superiority (what would be anyway the gain since nobody knows mle in person).

    I am serious in my proposal.

    But if you turn to the ironical aspect as a mean of defense from the 'foreigner', I still can understand it very well.

    I, too, praise the quietly atmosphere of the family surrounded only by well known friends and supporters.

    I will have in this case to choose other ways and to fight my battles alone.
    Who knows, maybe I will come out stronger from it.
    Or, like others, dead.
    It is a risk.
    I agree.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Canucco Dei Mergi,

    "Barmy"= mad, crazy, unsound in mind, delusional etc. etc. On consideration, I favour delusional.

    A bit hard? Not at all. In a Dodge City poker game you would have been shot dead by now.

    Lay your cards on the table or leave the game.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Canucco dei Mergi
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post

    Canucco Dei Mergi is f*cking barmy. Whoops! I've said it again.

    So sue me!
    Why should I sue you ? I don't even know what is a 'barmy'.
    But yes, I think you are a bit hard.
    Is it necessary ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X