Its my understanding, as Don and Sam have said, that bloodhounds can detect trace odors and using them, locate a specific source,... based on the sodium and ammonia in the sweat and other elements. Thats why whenever possible they get an article of the subjects clothing to prompt the bloodhounds with.
Dogs are reported to have a sense of smell nearly 2000 times as powerful as humans have.....they can smell cadavers through water...when lake searches are needed. It was done here in Ontario recently....without finding the still missing childs remains.
All the best
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would the bloodhounds have saved Warren's career ?
Collapse
X
-
Guest replied
-
Sam,
perhaps they thought he was Shari Lewis in drag
Lambchop is not amused!
Don.
Leave a comment:
-
David,
and now I know I have a problem with transatlantic sense of humour.
But then I could never understand why Jerry Lewis was so celebrated in France.
Don.
Leave a comment:
-
I was extremely offended, Don,
and now I know I have a problem with transatlantic sense of humour.
I'm a simpleton sometimes. That's well known, but accept my apologies anyway.
Amitiés,
Don Gorgon
Leave a comment:
-
Dave,
If you don't see the humor in that post then I apologize. No offense was intended.
Don.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Supe View PostBut then we had someone admit to knowing absolutely nothing about the subject of bloodhounds and yet could not rersist giving his opinion. Part of what makes the boards fun.
Don.
This wouldn't have helped the bloodhounds, and that's just what my post was saying.
Amitiés,
David
Leave a comment:
-
Sam,
My post was not directed to you.
Anyway, just to show you there is nothing new (or even moderately old) there was the old vaudeville joke, may have been Gallagher & Shean.
Mr. G: I got a scented letter from a woman today.
Mr. S: Woo hoo, really?
Mr. G: Yes--postage due 15 cents.
Probably goes back to Aristophanes.
Don.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Supe View PostYep. Seems to me I said the same thing a few posts back (#10).
Eccles: I got a scented letter once!
Bluebottle: Cor! Did you, really, Enkles?
Eccles: Yeah! It was sented by post...
(S. Milligan - The Goon Show)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Supe View PostBut then we had someone admit to knowing absolutely nothing about the subject of bloodhounds and yet could not rersist giving his opinion. Part of what makes the boards fun.
Don.
Sometimes, people can hazard an opinion... And doing so, they hope to be corrected.
Fair enough, especially since they are fair enough to precise that they're no expert in the relevant field.
But at times, their hazarded oipinions turn out to be shared by (Welsh) people who know more.
Amitiés Don,
David
Leave a comment:
-
Hi, Sam. Thats cool that your Dad was a professional dog handler! (I am in the process of training my Germ. Shep. to be a visiting Therapy dog.) Perhaps I didnt phrase my previous post properly: I understand that bloodhounds follow personal bodily scents, not just blood- my question stems from the fact that the police had no personal article belonging to and therefore smelling like the killer by which to follow him. So unless Jack came into so much physical contact with Mary Kelly while murdering her that he physically picked up her personal scent, what scent could the dogs possibly follow? And while I know that human bodies have very particular individual scents which dogs can track, do the individual bodily organs & blood of a victim have a discreet enough smell that a dog could follow them when surrounded by so many other scents, including fresh slaughterhouse blood? (For instance, if Jacks shirt were splashed with some of Marys blood & was carrying her heart, would those substances smell so uniquely like her that Jack could be tracked?) - Thanks!
Leave a comment:
-
Sam,
Yep. Seems to me I said the same thing a few posts back (#10). This thread is rather short so, even though now well "off-scent," people ought read all the previous posts. But then we had someone admit to knowing absolutely nothing about the subject of bloodhounds and yet could not rersist giving his opinion. Part of what makes the boards fun.
Don.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Archaic,
The word bloodhound is a bit of a misnomer. Dogs pick up on a whole host of bodily odours when following a scent - they don't "lock onto" a trail of blood as such.
If the dogs would have been of any use at all at Miller's Court (which I very much doubt), then they'd have been quite happy to pick up and follow the scent of the killer alone, rather than having to rely on any traces of Kelly's blood about his person.
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=Nothing to see;81390]Whose scent would the dogs have followed? Probably was a good idea when first thought of but it was left too late to be practical. [/QUOTE
NothingToSee has a good point. What scent were the dog's supposed to follow- even if they had gotten them out fairly early? The victim's body is in situ, so unless the killer is utterly drenched in her blood and/or has taken her clothes, how can they follow him? He doesn't appear to have left anything behind, and I doubt poor Mary's stolen heart had much scent to it. "Working dogs" are amazing, but what with all the inhabitants, markets, slaughter-houses, trash, etc., I imagine the poor hounds might have had nervous breakdowns trying to following Jack through Whitechapel. (And any fiasco so completely in the public eye as that might have led Warren to commit hari-kari!)
- And by the way, does the blood of different individuals really smell differently?? This just occurred to me... Anybody know? Would the victim's blood alone have a distinct smell to a trained bloodhound, or would another "personal scent" be required in conjunction with it?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: