Masonic Police

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi David,

    I can't find the "Nearn retirement pipe" reference in my paperback copy of Sugden. Mind you, Sugden's book has got the worst index in all of Ripperdom.

    Help!

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi Paul,
    I'm ok, thanks.
    Don't know more about these 6, sorry. Simply got it from good old Sugden...

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • paul emmett
    replied
    Hi, David. I hope you have been well. So, did the police Brothers sign it?
    Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Thanks Don,
    That what it seemed to me: just an expression to show affection.

    Hi Paul, it's a long time I didn't hear from you.

    Amitiés all,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • paul emmett
    replied
    Originally posted by Supe View Post
    David,

    Could this be a masonic hint?

    Well, can't rule out anything, I suppose, but 'brother officers" is pretty much a straightforward formulation in English.
    Do the six bro's sign it? Yes would seem straightforward; no might seem covert.

    Leave a comment:


  • Supe
    replied
    David,

    Could this be a masonic hint?

    Well, can't rule out anything, I suppose, but 'brother officers" is pretty much a straightforward formulation in English.

    Don.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    On a pipe presented to Insp Nearn (for his retirement), we find these words:

    "Souvenir to James Nearne, Whitechapel Murders, 1888, from six brother officers."
    Could this be a masonic hint?

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • Vigilantee
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Vigilantee,

    Fenian Fire is required reading for a complete understanding of the WM.

    Conspiracy and subterfuge were Anderson and Monro's stock in trade. They were professional liars in the service of their country. And they both thought JC was about to make a comeback, which is doubly worrying as to their state of mind.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Yes, Supt Cutbush probably agreed, and maybe his 'nephew' was already after the 'whores of babylon' with his seven starred blade

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Vigilantee,

    Fenian Fire is required reading for a complete understanding of the WM.

    Conspiracy and subterfuge were Anderson and Monro's stock in trade. They were professional liars in the service of their country. And they both thought JC was about to make a comeback, which is doubly worrying as to their state of mind.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Quite right Simon---with you there on all counts 100%
    cheers
    Norma

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Vigilantee,

    Fenian Fire is required reading for a complete understanding of the WM.

    Conspiracy and subterfuge were Anderson and Monro's stock in trade. They were professional liars in the service of their country. And they both thought JC was about to make a comeback, which is doubly worrying as to their state of mind.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Norma,

    Disagreement by "those in the know" is essential to a good conspiracy.

    Regards,

    Simon
    But Simon,what was there to be "in the know " about?The knew very little as far as I can tell----partly because the man in the top job , Anderson ,was up to his neck in sculduggery about Home Rule and Orange politics just wishing and hoping Jack would go away-Abberline was committed---for a while----but when Cleveland Street blew up he was off like a shot to engage in a bit of sculduggery himself ---like covering the tracks of those involved and seeing the leaders safely abroad!

    Leave a comment:


  • Vigilantee
    replied
    Of course Anderson and Munro were no strangers to 'conspiracy'

    Golden jubilees? The Queen should be wary. Christy Campbell tells the story of the 19th-century gunpowder plot that would not amused Queen Victoria in Fenian Fire

    Leave a comment:


  • Vigilantee
    replied
    Possibly, it all depends who told whom what and we'll never know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Norma,

    Disagreement by "those in the know" is essential to a good conspiracy.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Well Vigilantee,there is no doubt that conspiracy theories can be great fun---and in the case of the one around Gull, Netley and co, hugely lucrative.I tend to think they were all fairly baffled by the ripper and had absolutely no idea who he was. Moreover its pretty clear they were all ready to ridicule each other and pour scorn on each other"s suspects as Abberline and Smith did.
    I suspect there was very little agreement between them about the various "theories".

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X