Kelly inquest/Smithkey

[David Orsam]

But the question of the jury perhaps having signed two copies is not a solution to the problem of the missing original.

I haven't said it is my dear boy.

[Pierre]

I haven't said it is my dear boy.

So why do you refer to #36?

[David Orsam]

So why do you refer to #36?

My dear boy, you asked a question in the OP of this thread and I have answered it. The printed handwritings in Smithkey are printed from the original papers of the coroner as held in the London Metropolitan Archives. Those papers include unsigned depositions only, so you can draw whatever conclusion you want to draw from that.

I can't answer every single question that pops into your head...

[Pierre]

My dear boy, you asked a question in the OP of this thread and I have answered it. The printed handwritings in Smithkey are printed from the original papers of the coroner as held in the London Metropolitan Archives. Those papers include unsigned depositions only, so you can draw whatever conclusion you want to draw from that.

I can't answer every single question that pops into your head...

But have you actually seen the original and not just the copies?

[David Orsam]

But have you actually seen the original and not just the copies?

Yes, of course.