Abberline and Special Branch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bridewell
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Lynn,

    Cosy?

    I'm amazed Pinkertons didn't have an office in New Scotland Yard.

    Regards,

    Simon
    How would we know if they did have? How do we know that they didn't?!

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Lynn,

    Cosy?

    I'm amazed Pinkertons didn't have an office in New Scotland Yard.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    cosy

    Hello Simon.

    "When Abberline was assisting Froest in 1898 his employer was Littlechild, who ran the London branch of Pinkertons.

    Another Littlechild employee was ex-Superintendent John Shore.

    They were all chums together."

    Sounds rather cosy.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Mike,

    The Pinkerton's origins were Scottish.

    Surely Willie would have been wanting to wear a Tam O'Shanter?

    Lynn Cates will set us straight about such arcane matters.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi All,

    When Abberline was assisting Froest in 1898 his employer was Littlechild, who ran the London branch of Pinkertons.

    Another Littlechild employee was ex-Superintendent John Shore.

    They were all chums together.

    Regards,

    Simon
    I remember David Williams, who wrote a book on the Pinkertons, called William Pinkerton an Anglophile. A London branch would have been the perfect excuse to wear his cockney hat!
    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi All,

    When Abberline was assisting Froest in 1898 his employer was Littlechild, who ran the London branch of Pinkertons.

    Another Littlechild employee was ex-Superintendent John Shore.

    They were all chums together.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    I believe he was promoted to inspector in 1873, so my bet is the 1878 article made the mistake.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    mistake?

    Hello Mike. Well spotted.

    There is also a clipping from about 1873 in which he is an inspector, but another from 1878, in which he is a serjeant. Wonder if that's a mistake?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Cheers.
    LC
    Now, this article states (post # 22) that Abberline is an ex-inspector who assisted Inspector Froest in an arrest. Abberline was working for the Pinkertons at this time. Incidentally, Froest was one of the detectives named on Tumblety's Marlborough Court charge sheet.

    Mike
    Last edited by mklhawley; 03-23-2012, 07:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    more to follow

    Hello Mike. Entirely welcome!

    Later, I will get to the long dynamite story.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Thank you so much for this Lynn. This is nothing less than awesome!

    Sincerely,

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    thanks

    Hello Simon. Thanks. Thought that Cracknell, Y division, was sent to watch Isenschmidt.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Lynn,

    Y Division was Highgate, main police station Kentish Town.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Y division

    Hello Simon. Thanks. I daresay.

    Y division? Wasn't that Holloway?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    yup

    Hello Dave. Yes, Indeed.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X