Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Faecal matter on apron piece

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Monty
    replied
    Beat me to it Colin.

    It is listed.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Apron

    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Dave,

    Odd that Inspector Collard should have overlooked such a pivotal piece of evidence.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Hi Simon,

    He didn't. It's the last item in the list of her possessions, suggesting she was no longer wearing it when found (perhaps):

    "1 Piece of old White Apron".

    Regards, Bridewell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hi Simon
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Odd that Inspector Collard should have overlooked such a pivotal piece of evidence.
    Hadn`t they taken it away to be compared to the cut away piece?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Hobnobs

    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Monty,

    Malibu?

    You're just up the road from me.

    Feel free to pop in for a cup of tea and a McVities Hobnob.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Hi Simon,
    You're too late. He's busy hobnobbing with Trevor apparently!

    Regards, Bridewell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Dave,

    Odd that Inspector Collard should have overlooked such a pivotal piece of evidence.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Monty,

    Malibu?

    You're just up the road from me.

    Feel free to pop in for a cup of tea and a McVities Hobnob.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Hi Simon

    Well so far as I'm aware, half accompanied the body to the mortuary, whilst the other half flitted to Goulston Street!

    Interesting though in such an otherwise detailed inventory...

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Dave,

    What happened to the apron?

    Regards,

    Simon
    It didn't exist.

    And I'm on a beach in Malibu with Trevor Marriott massaging my feet and pouring me cocktails.

    Isn't that right Sweetie?

    Trevor says Hi x

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Dave,

    What happened to the apron?

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    But let me asK you, do they mention what you would consider to be an extensive amount of staining, fully consistent with a women mutilated to the extent of Eddowes? I'll ask you because phil is apparently suffering from PCS.
    Hi Ally

    The famous black straw bonnet "no blood on front, but the back was lying in a pool of blood, which had run from the neck"

    Black Cloth Jacket "no blood on front outside, large quantity of Blood inside and outside back, outside back very dirty with Blood & dirt"

    Chintz Skirt "Edges slightly bloodstained, also Blood on bottom, back and front of skirt"

    Brown Linsey Dress Bodice ""blood inside & outside back of neck & shoulders"

    Grey Stuff Petticoat "Edges blood stained, blood stains on front at bottom of Petticoat"

    Very Old Green Alpaca Skirt "blood stained inside, front under cut"

    Very Old Ragged Blue Skirt "blood stained inside & outside back & front"

    White Calico Chemise "very much blood stained all over, apparently torn thus in middle of front"

    Mans White Vest "very much Blood stained at back, Blood & other stains on front"

    Pair of Mens Lace up boots "six blood marks on right boot"

    large White Handkerchief "bloodstained"

    Blue Stripe Bed ticking pocket "Blood stained"

    Not to mention the pools of blood around the head, neck & shoulders witnessed by Inspector Collard. Interestingly Doctor Brown states that there were no marks below the middle of the body, but goes on to mention "several buttons were found in the clotted blood after the body was removed" - presumably referring to blood under the lower part of the body...He also, in contradiction of the official inventory, states that "there was no blood on the front of the clothes", "no traces of recent connection", "When the body arrived at Golden Lane some of the blood was dispersed through the removal of the body to the mortuary"

    So it would appear, yes a fair amount of staining and blood around...whether that's "fully consistent" or not with the degree of mutilation, I don't think I'm qualified to make a firm judgement, but my amateur guess would be yes...I suspect a lot of blood lodged in the abdominal cavity and it was this, disturbed, which dispersed on the journey to the mortuary.

    Incidentally the White Vest is described as having "Blood & other stains on front" - given no traces of recent connection do you reckon these other stains might just be....no!

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Rob,

    Sad indeed.

    As an old hand, I am pleased to report that there are some very bright new kids on the block.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Hello Rob,

    As my time was limited on my visit to London, the visit to Mitre Square, the school next door and a hurried meeting afterwards necessitated limitations.
    It was a most rewarding day.

    Best wishes

    Phil

    PS. No, it wasn't Neil
    Last edited by Phil Carter; 07-09-2012, 08:00 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    No idea Phil, I cannot recall just now.

    I can recall that Halse was deep in the bowels of Kearley & Tonge up until moments before Watkins arrived. He opened the door slightly and started sweeping the stairs. So any sound would not have been that strong to him. And if he did hear it, the square is a public thoroughfare, would he have paid a mass amount of attention when he had chores to do?

    Monty


    PS Of course I mean Morris. Long day.
    Hello Monty,

    Again thank you. If I remember correctly the door was opened at 1.43? Two mins before Watkins arriived, no?

    Best wishes

    Phil
    Last edited by Phil Carter; 07-09-2012, 07:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    No worries Colin,

    I don't think City did have those boots, Met had them didn't they?

    I think Morris was trying to get across that he often heard Watkins pass. However he wasn't specific as to when nor where he was when he did hear.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Clack
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Supe,

    Just to level the playing field, a growing number of researchers with whom I am having correspondence are not echoing your sentiments.

    Regards,

    Simon
    It's a sad day for Ripperology when i hear statements like that.

    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Rob,

    "The fact is Jack was there unless your suggesting Catherine Eddowes committed suicide."

    Now you're just stamping your foot.

    Regards,

    Simon
    No, just waiting for you to make your point.

    Rob

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X