Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Serial Killers, A pattern???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • corey123
    replied
    There is the murder of Martha in the box.

    As to his 'comfort zone' it is the area he feels safe to kill around, not that he lives withing th area.

    he did live locally though.

    Kate,

    Give me a moment I will make three of them.

    Yours truly

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by KatBradshaw View Post
    Why does the box cut so far from Mitre Sq?
    And why is there no murder within the box ?
    Looks like the Ripper discomfort-zone to me.

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    I don't think that Goulston Street is where he lived!
    I agree that it was on his way home to his comfort zone. What I am saying in that you could pull the zone further out down WHS.

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    I had always though goulston street to be his escape route. I doubt he was comfortable with the street at all, if his home or workplace was centered around goulston street why dump evidence there??

    If I was the killer I would want to dump the evidence outside of my comfort zone. To throw off the police.

    What I should of done was connected millers court,hanbury street, and berner street for that is his secondary comfort zone, his primary would be around bucks row.

    yours truly
    Last edited by corey123; 12-30-2009, 11:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    I would have thought that Goulston Street was in his comfort zone to some extent hence stopping and dropping the apron. Possibly he thought that he was safe enough to stop for a moment or he saw someone and hid.

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Trip down to hell

    I dont think Jack met Kate in Aldgate. I think she had a bit of very rotten luck and was picked up in his primary comfort zone, then she led him to mitre square for god knows why and he deemed the location secure.

    Hope that makes sense


    Yours truly

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by corey123 View Post
    This is back to narcissism,

    Veiwing his geographic profile, it seems that the killer was more disorganised than organised. He sticks to a relativly small reagon where he kills and doesnt travel more that a mile. Less than that realy.

    Maybe this was just his cunningness speaking more than being disorganised. Maybe he didnt fear detection? Maybe he was confident in his ability.

    Who knows.

    Heres a map of the area which I connected four of the murder sites.
    Why does the box cut so far from Mitre Sq?

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Geo profile

    This is back to narcissism,

    Veiwing his geographic profile, it seems that the killer was more disorganised than organised. He sticks to a relativly small reagon where he kills and doesnt travel more that a mile. Less than that realy.

    Maybe this was just his cunningness speaking more than being disorganised. Maybe he didnt fear detection? Maybe he was confident in his ability.

    Who knows.

    Heres a map of the area which I connected four of the murder sites.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by corey123 View Post
    Mike,

    thats sounds to be a interesting thread, Do you happen to remember the name??
    I dont sadly corey, and Im sloppy at times with my personal note filings ...but I do know that Sam saved the enhanced photo and Im sure could verify for you that the thread was as stated. Maybe even give you the photo.

    I suppose its an old shed door, theres no reason to number the door into the house from the archway, it almost at the courtyard entrance and you have to walk all that way to get to it...but the shed faced onto Dorset, and I guess McCarthy was being Green before his time.

    Cheers corey

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Mike,

    thats sounds to be a interesting thread, Do you happen to remember the name??

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Sox View Post
    No13 had a false wall or partition, if this was a brick wall or not I really couldn't say. If I remember rightly the partition wall was the one which the bed was up against.
    This is an interesting sidebar point Sox....the "partition" wall was said to be made of old doors and it was the wall that backed onto the staircase leading to the upper floor, that Elizabeth climbs and has opportunity to see through via the cracks....from I assume, the plaster. Marys bed is less than a foot from it.

    A while back on here we were looking at that wall and I believe Sam discovered that a faded "26" was on the wall, on a door that was used to block what was likely at one time an access-way to the upper floors and the door inside the archway. The room was said to have originally to have been a parlour...which explains why the fireplace isnt a traditional cooking hearth style of the period, its even had a mantle I believe.

    Just an FYI...in case you missed that thread....I believe its the first time anyone proved the comments regarding the "old doors" as viable.

    Cheers Sox

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    experimental theory

    An area to post short stories, poems, artwork or any other creative expression with reference to the Ripper Murders.


    Click on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    correct


    thanks again.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Almost, Corey!

    Organs : 21 stabs
    Sternum: 1
    Cut "lower part": 1
    Throat: 9 (according to the DN)

    So 8 in the "private parts", including the cut.

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    so I think it is safe to say there were 8 wounds to the throat, nine to the lower body and 21 to the torso??

    thanks

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X