If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
That isnt really relavent, and no concreit answer can arise.
I disagree here. How would he happen upon a murdered woman in this building?? Surely that is the key to your theory that he found her.
And most beginning crimes by serial murders are almost near opposite to their capital crimes. If anyone else out of the canonicals fit his profile it is her. Where the throat, abdomen, and private parts were the targets as were with the canonicles. Also going from a stab to a rip isnt a big jump. Another thing there was one that was more of a rip than a stab.
I agree she fits the profile well, that doesn't make her a Ripper victim though. I think it is far more likely that she was killed by the Ripper than that the Ripper discovered her body and decided to turn her in to a human pin cushion.
I dont think Jack met Kate in Aldgate. I think she had a bit of very rotten luck and was picked up in his primary comfort zone, then she led him to mitre square for god knows why and he deemed the location secure.
Yours truly
Hi Corey,
in fact, Jack and Kate were walking back to Bishopsgate Police Station, the latter erroneously assuming that PC Hutt was ready for a threesome experience.
Passing Mitre Square, they met PC Watkins.
Watkins or Hutt, it made no difference for Jack.
And he was exhausted, having run from St George (indeed, the mere memory of Schwartz' face still filled him with dread).
Unfortunately, Kate was to find Watkins' face distateful to the extreme.
Excessively long and narrow.
The over-sensitive constable got hurt and cawed: " Take care, I'll give you a nice hiding if I see you around again!"
He headed then proudly to the Church passage.
As the echo of his heels died away, Jack lost control.
That isnt really relavent, and no concreit answer can arise. And most beginning crimes by serial murders are almost near opposite to their capital crimes. If anyone else out of the canonicals fit his profile it is her. Where the throat, abdomen, and private parts were the targets as were with the canonicles. Also going from a stab to a rip isnt a big jump. Another thing there was one that was more of a rip than a stab.
Well not really if you compare it to the case of the Yorkshire Ripper.
It could be he stabbed with one knife and then decided the other one he had was better.
You would have to question why Jack was inside that building in the first place to find Martha.
Not as it seems, there were 39 stab wounds, one which could have been caused by a dagger the rest by a pen knife. This is whats farfetched, a killer stabbing a women once with one weapon then changing knifes to stab her 38 more times.
I prefer both senerios but the one I described is more logical.
But then you have another senerio I like, is when he could have made the other wound look as if it was done by another knife, but that depeneds on if they seperated the two wound typed by depth or width.
Remember that Goulston Street was a well known hotspot for the Jewish occupancy. If the GSG location was close to his bolt-hole, he could still have been "throwing off the police" in the direction of the Jewish community, which, courtesy of "Leather Apron", had already become a popular target for ripper-related suspicion.
I have little doubt that the ripper's comfort zone encompassed Goulston Street.
They are interesting plots Corey and I can see the theory from which you are working. I think his 'zone' is bigger though.
Are you taking Buck's Row as closest to his home because this is the first canonical murder? This assumes that this was the first attack, which I don't believe it was.
Leave a comment: