Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GSG xmas present

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GSG xmas present

    Hi everyone,

    I have promised you a xmas present. With this present I hope that the GSG will be much clearer to all here.

    The present has four parts (you may think it has more).

    One is a new source.

    One is the explanation for the GSG.

    One is the motive for killing all the victims.

    One is the explanation for the double negative in the GSG.

    1. I have found a new document produced by an institution and it is in an archive in Britain.

    In this document there are two lies. One is not being presented here since it is giving an ID connected to the data from the Whitechapel murders.

    The other lie which is to be presented to you here is:

    The person giving the data in this source told those who produced the source that he was a judge although he was not.

    It is clearly written and visible.

    There is an external function for the whole document which explains how it is connected to the Whitechapel murders.

    There are also many sources which have a high explanatory value for the motive behind the GSG.

    2. I will now give you the explanation for the GSG:

    There was a very serious threat against him from the judges on the 1st and 2nd October. There is another original source from an archive stating this.

    He wanted to stop them. There is another original source from an archive stating that.

    There are several sources showing that:

    There was a trial against him.

    He was blamed.

    He did not accept it.

    He was very shamed.

    One person knew that he was trying to stop the process and the communication is directed to him. There is more communication throughout the case and it is always directed to the same person.

    On the night of the double event the killer knew what was going to happen on the 1st and 2nd October.

    To stop the judicial process against him he wrote on the wall in Goulston Street:

    The judges are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.

    He took it upon himself to act like a judge in his own cause:

    He was not the "judge" who would be blamed for nothing. He claimed that he was innocent.

    (But he was guilty, there is a source for this).

    3. The victims, all of them, were killed to make the procedure against him stop.

    That was the paramount motive of the killer.


    The murder of Stride was for the threat against him on 1st October, the murder of Eddowes was for the threat against him on 2nd October.

    The judges are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.

    = The judges at court were the men that were to be blamed for something: They were to be blamed for the murders.

    If they stopped the procedure, the murders would stop.

    4. The reason for the double negative is the two aspects of blame on judges:
    the blame on the killer who acted as a judge in his own cause and the blame on the real judges.

    When the murders stopped after Pinchin Street 1889, the judges had stopped the procedure.

    I have some work to do but will read your comments and also respond later.

    I wish you all a very Merry Xmas.

    Best wishes, Pierre

  • #2
    I hope you saved the gift receipt, because I would like to return it
    "Is all that we see or seem
    but a dream within a dream?"

    -Edgar Allan Poe


    "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
    quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

    -Frederick G. Abberline

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Pierre View Post
      Hi everyone,

      I have promised you a xmas present. With this present I hope that the GSG will be much clearer to all here.

      The present has four parts (you may think it has more).

      One is a new source.

      One is the explanation for the GSG.

      One is the motive for killing all the victims.

      One is the explanation for the double negative in the GSG.

      1. I have found a new document produced by an institution and it is in an archive in Britain.

      In this document there are two lies. One is not being presented here since it is giving an ID connected to the data from the Whitechapel murders.

      The other lie which is to be presented to you here is:

      The person giving the data in this source told those who produced the source that he was a judge although he was not.

      It is clearly written and visible.

      There is an external function for the whole document which explains how it is connected to the Whitechapel murders.

      There are also many sources which have a high explanatory value for the motive behind the GSG.

      2. I will now give you the explanation for the GSG:

      There was a very serious threat against him from the judges on the 1st and 2nd October. There is another original source from an archive stating this.

      He wanted to stop them. There is another original source from an archive stating that.

      There are several sources showing that:

      There was a trial against him.

      He was blamed.

      He did not accept it.

      He was very shamed.

      One person knew that he was trying to stop the process and the communication is directed to him. There is more communication throughout the case and it is always directed to the same person.

      On the night of the double event the killer knew what was going to happen on the 1st and 2nd October.

      To stop the judicial process against him he wrote on the wall in Goulston Street:

      The judges are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.

      He took it upon himself to act like a judge in his own cause:

      He was not the "judge" who would be blamed for nothing. He claimed that he was innocent.

      (But he was guilty, there is a source for this).

      3. The victims, all of them, were killed to make the procedure against him stop.

      That was the paramount motive of the killer.


      The murder of Stride was for the threat against him on 1st October, the murder of Eddowes was for the threat against him on 2nd October.

      The judges are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.

      = The judges at court were the men that were to be blamed for something: They were to be blamed for the murders.

      If they stopped the procedure, the murders would stop.

      4. The reason for the double negative is the two aspects of blame on judges:
      the blame on the killer who acted as a judge in his own cause and the blame on the real judges.

      When the murders stopped after Pinchin Street 1889, the judges had stopped the procedure.

      I have some work to do but will read your comments and also respond later.

      I wish you all a very Merry Xmas.

      Best wishes, Pierre


      Actually Pierre, apart from the dates I had sort of guessed all that you posted, drawing on much of what you have previously posted.

      The only thing missing is a reference to "Helen" who ever she was!

      And UNFORTUNATELY it takes nothing any further forward.

      Again we have claimed, undisclosed sources from unnamed archives, no details which is what i specifically requested earlier in the week.


      I try and be fair to you as much as possible, but the post will achieve nothing other than to wind people up I fear.

      Its a bit like opening the box to find it empty.

      No other comments as there is nothing to comment on!




      Steve

      Comment


      • #4
        Pierre,

        You have critiqued a document and interpreted it the way you think it reads. You have not provided the source for anyone else to do the same. Are we supposed lay down and agree with you on those terms? The historical sources all say the word on the wall was in some form or fashion 'Jews'. Not judges. Where do you draw the line for what historical sources are correct and incorrect? Only when it fits into your theory? You have done nothing to change the status quo.

        Comment


        • #5
          I would've preferred a scalextric...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
            I hope you saved the gift receipt, because I would like to return it
            Did you actually receive Pierre's xmas present then Abby?

            I appear to be still waiting for it.

            I know it can't be that incomprehensible waffle in the OP which I assume is just the boring prelude to actual exciting gift.

            I'm guessing he's sent the present round by PM so if you can forward it on to me that would be great, thanks.

            Comment


            • #7
              I dont recall seeing any authority figure writing down what was written on the wall as "judges", nor do I any dips in the recorded versions that would substantiate a "g" interpretation.
              Michael Richards

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
                Actually Pierre, apart from the dates I had sort of guessed all that you posted, drawing on much of what you have previously posted.

                The only thing missing is a reference to "Helen" who ever she was!

                And UNFORTUNATELY it takes nothing any further forward.

                Again we have claimed, undisclosed sources from unnamed archives, no details which is what i specifically requested earlier in the week.


                I try and be fair to you as much as possible, but the post will achieve nothing other than to wind people up I fear.

                Its a bit like opening the box to find it empty.

                No other comments as there is nothing to comment on!

                Steve
                Hi Steve,

                And what do you think about the source I have presented to you?

                Regards, Pierre

                Comment


                • #9
                  I'm seeing mention in this thread to a "source".

                  Where do I find this source?

                  And when are we going to get our xmas present?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    QUOTE=jerryd;403925

                    Pierre,

                    You have critiqued a document and interpreted it the way you think it reads. You have not provided the source for anyone else to do the same. Are we supposed lay down and agree with you on those terms?
                    Jerry,

                    You are not supposed to do anything at all.

                    The historical sources all say the word on the wall was in some form or fashion 'Jews'. Not judges.
                    The first source in the source hierachy gave "Juwes". There is no evidence for a killer having any problem with "Juwes".

                    Where do you draw the line for what historical sources are correct and incorrect? Only when it fits into your theory?
                    I draw the line when there are too many sources pointing to the killer and when these sources at the same time give motive explanations as well as functional and causal explanations. Then I have to rule out "chance". There is nothing else to do.

                    Regards, Pierre
                    Last edited by Pierre; 12-22-2016, 11:44 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Pierre View Post
                      Hi Steve,

                      And what do you think about the source I have presented to you?

                      Regards, Pierre
                      The issue Pierre is that I do not see a source, with all due respect you saying you have found a source and saying what you think it means is not presenting a source

                      if there were details i have questions to ask, but there are no details are there just your views.

                      cheers

                      steve

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
                        I dont recall seeing any authority figure writing down what was written on the wall as "judges", nor do I any dips in the recorded versions that would substantiate a "g" interpretation.
                        Daniel Halse gave Juwes.

                        W equals two letters.

                        Jews is not spelled Ju-w-es.

                        Regards, Pierre

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
                          The issue Pierre is that I do not see a source, with all due respect you saying you have found a source and saying what you think it means is not presenting a source

                          if there were details i have questions to ask, but there are no details are there just your views.

                          cheers

                          steve
                          Steve,

                          The new source showing that he falsely stated that he was a judge is not "a view". It is a source in a British archive.

                          Cheers

                          Pierre

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Pierre View Post
                            Daniel Halse gave Juwes.

                            W equals two letters.

                            Jews is not spelled Ju-w-es.

                            Regards, Pierre
                            Neither is ju-dg-es. Your stretching it a bit (a lot) to turn a w into a combo dg.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
                              Did you actually receive Pierre's xmas present then Abby?

                              I appear to be still waiting for it.

                              I know it can't be that incomprehensible waffle in the OP which I assume is just the boring prelude to actual exciting gift.

                              I'm guessing he's sent the present round by PM so if you can forward it on to me that would be great, thanks.
                              you don't want--it was a lump of coal
                              "Is all that we see or seem
                              but a dream within a dream?"

                              -Edgar Allan Poe


                              "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                              quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                              -Frederick G. Abberline

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X