my views

[corey123]

yes

yes when dr.gorden brown examined Eddowes' the ear fell from her garment.
but the proximity of the two days and that the letter was written right befor the murder of Eddowes' and Stride is too much to be meer coincidence and also the fact that the ripper may have felt the urge to take credit for his work that to as he says "dont mind me giveing the tradename"

thank you

[lynn cates]

ear now guv

Hello Corey.

"the writer mentions that I shall clip the lady's ears off
is e[e]rily reminis[c]ent [of] how the ripper clip[p]ed Eddowes['] ear off"

Possibly, but her ear was found in her garments. Now it is generally thought to be collateral damage.

The best.
LC

[corey123]

First of all i need to note how the "dear boss" letter was the first communique using the nick name 'Jack the ripper'. i belive there are many points showing its eligability to being the killer

as said:"[I]that joke about the leather apron gave me real fits"[I]
makes me belive that one view could be that the killer wanted reconisation and didnt want his work to be confused with that of the 'leather apron' or john pizer. another point to be reconized:
"The next job I do I shall clip the ladys ears off and send to the police officers just for jolly wouldnt you.
which comes in with how the proximity of the date the letter was written to the date of the 'double event' is too much to be a coincidence to me.
the date turned it to the CNA:september 27th 1888
the date of the 'double event':september 30th 1888
and that how the writer mentions that I shall clip the ladys ears off
is errily reminesent to how the ripper cliped Eddowes ear off

yours truly