Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An experiment

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [QUOTE=GUT;418496]

    Not only both got it wrong, but the same wrong.
    That is a very interesting answer, GUT.

    Why did they get the same wrong?

    Comment


    • [QUOTE=Pierre;418587]
      Originally posted by GUT View Post


      That is a very interesting answer, GUT.

      Why did they get the same wrong?
      Why don't you STATE SOMETHING rather than continually asking questions of others?

      Oh of course: it's because every time you state something it is immediately and irrefutably shown to be hilariously erroneous.

      My apologies. I forgot how badly things have gone for you here.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Pierre View Post


        That is a very interesting answer, GUT.

        Why did they get the same wrong?
        The fact is they didn't.

        I love that a so called academic historian is willing to ignore the only sources we have, that all say Juwes, and instead insert a word of his own choosing. Real academic integrity there. Even the great scientist or sociologist or whatever else you pretend to be wouldn't do that.
        G U T

        There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

        Comment


        • << That would also explain the superlative use of "the men" in the phrase "the jews are the men than will not be blamed for nothing". If the phrase actually referred to the jews, it would say "The jews will not be blamed for nothing". >>

          This was a time when women weren't always referenced as part of a culture...for instance, Englishmen could be used in place of The English. So the fact that the statement mentions men specifically doesn't mean it isn't discussing a mixed group of genders.

          Comment

          Working...
          X