Could be the 'real final solution'....?

[RivkahChaya]

Is this a bag or...

A pretty good reconstruction of Mary Jane Kelly.

[The Good Michael]

Is this a bag or...

[richardnunweek]

Hi,,
For the record, I do not believe any signature is in Kelly's room. left by anyone, and also Sickert is way down on my list as being anything else then a artist.
Regards Richard.

[curious4]

It doesn't even prove he was in the room, who knows where the crap came from that was used to build that partition, I know where there is a piece of Masonite with a half finished painting of Her Majesty by one of Australia's preeminent artists of his day, it is being used to block a whole in a fence to keep someones dogs in, been there for about 60 years. Of course by now it has probably rotted away

True. Apparently some of Van Gogh's paintings were used to build chicken coops.

C4

[belinda]

Is your real name Patricia Cornwell? Seriously I don't see anything but scribble

[GUT]

Hi Gut.
Walter Sickert has been quoted, to have been a major suspect in this case, his paintings, were alleged to have given clues , rather like a signature in Room 13..don't you think?
He possibly wrote at least one letter, he acted strangely.
This is not a Mr Brown, or Mrs Smith , we are talking about.
I ask a question?
If the name Druitt, could be seen on a wall in the room, or Kozminski, would you also find it irrelevant?
Regards Richard.

Yep.

Come on let's get a little real, no killer is going to sign his name on the wall of the room he has mutilated someone in.

AND how stupid o you think the polic were, yes they didn't have modern CSI at their disposal, but if someone had signed their name in the wall, they may have had just a tiny bit of interest in said person.

[Brenda]

.

I could see the "pictures" that Packer's was speaking of, but that "signature" looks nothing like SICKERT to me.

[Harry D]

Why would a serial killer be stupid enough to leave his signature at a crime scene?

[richardnunweek]

Hi Gut.
Walter Sickert has been quoted, to have been a major suspect in this case, his paintings, were alleged to have given clues , rather like a signature in Room 13..don't you think?
He possibly wrote at least one letter, he acted strangely.
This is not a Mr Brown, or Mrs Smith , we are talking about.
I ask a question?
If the name Druitt, could be seen on a wall in the room, or Kozminski, would you also find it irrelevant?
Regards Richard.

[RockySullivan]

It seems that about 85% of theories rely on the police being to dumb (or incompetent to be able to find their nose on their face).

Do you get COPS down there? If you watch the show enough you'll see how cops are worse than the criminals they arrest...they have no interest in "justice" it's all about the quantity of charges they can pin on whoever is unlucky enough. I wouldn't trust a cop to find my nose on my face, let alone solve a murder

[Shaggyrand]

i assume this thread is sarcastic but i don't know anymore. If there was anything purposefully drawn on the wall don't you think the detectives would have noticed? I mean i know how utterly incompetent the police are so i guess its possible they wouldn't even look at the wall

I thought the first posts on these images were too. The longer you look at something the more likely you'll see something in a discoloration or odd shadowing. Just how we all process some intakes. No shame in your pareidolia.
Honestly, I don't think a high rez clean up of the Miller Court picture, from as close to the original a copy as can be done, is a bad idea. There might be something there that's been overlooked in the picture. Don't think the police were incompetent (well, no more incompetent than they usually are anyway), so maybe even something they knew about. It would at least give something new to argue over... Possibly.

[GUT]

i assume this thread is sarcastic but i don't know anymore. If there was anything purposefully drawn on the wall don't you think the detectives would have noticed? I mean i know how utterly incompetent the police are so i guess its possible they wouldn't even look at the wall

It seems that about 85% of theories rely on the police being to dumb (or incompetent to be able to find their nose on their face).

[RockySullivan]

i assume this thread is sarcastic but i don't know anymore. If there was anything purposefully drawn on the wall don't you think the detectives would have noticed? I mean i know how utterly incompetent the police are so i guess its possible they wouldn't even look at the wall

[GUT]

I can see the Sickert signature, but that would only prove that he was in the room at some point. Not that he was a killer, right?

It doesn't even prove he was in the room, who knows where the crap came from that was used to build that partition, I know where there is a piece of Masonite with a half finished painting of Her Majesty by one of Australia's preeminent artists of his day, it is being used to block a whole in a fence to keep someones dogs in, been there for about 60 years. Of course by now it has probably rotted away

[GUT]

Hi..
If Sickert's signature is in that room , in any form,,we have found our ''Jack''.. it annoys me when people say, just because he may have wrote a letter , or two, it means nothing, or just because he was once in Kelly's room, it means nothing..
it means everything.
Regards Richard.

Richard I don't get the

it annoys me when people say, just because he may have wrote a letter , or two, it means nothing,

TYhe police and papers received hundreds of letters claiming responsibility, clearly they weren't all from one person, clearly they weren't all Jacky Boy. So how is Sickert, if he wrote any of them, different than any other letter writer.