Could be the 'real final solution'....?

[packers stem]

SIB8FGA

Pierre

Pierre,I will point out for the second time that you are talking about MJK3 which is the photo from the other side of the bed
I am talking about MJK1, the original photo of the body lying on the bed.
I have pointed out the 'data' to you, if you are struggling with interpreting said 'data' it doesn't bode well for your mystery 'data' fuelled theory

[packers stem]

Yep.

Come on let's get a little real, no killer is going to sign his name on the wall of the room he has mutilated someone in.

AND how stupid o you think the polic were, yes they didn't have modern CSI at their disposal, but if someone had signed their name in the wall, they may have had just a tiny bit of interest in said person.

An artist who signs his work would do so without thinking
Even if the police had seen the signature at the time it would mean nothing to the ordinary bobby, just anyone's name, he was not a particularly world famous artist at the time, signature would not have been instantly recognisable to most.
But....it's there on MJK1, the provenance of which has been unquestioned by us over the years....it's been staring us in the face

[packers stem]

But writing letters makes you a major suspect???

Depends on the content of the letter I think but signing the wall of a murder scene most definitely does!!!

[GUT]

Think we may find he was a journalist

But writing letters makes you a major suspect???

[Pierre]

Think we may find he was a journalist

SIB8FGA

Pierre

[belinda]

Or there's the one about fools, I know which category I fall into.

It's a fine line

[John Wheat]

Hi John
I'm sure of what I can see.I don't know if you've looked closely or not. It may be that I'm wrong and you're right and if that's the case then so be it.
But if I'm proven right it would be the most important discovery in ripperology bar none so surely it's worth looking into rather than just everyone having another argument about schwartz or Hutchinson.
A thorough examination of the original would prove it one way or the other and until then no one can really say that something is 100% there or 100% not there

To Packers Stem

I still don't see anything but a dirty wall. However I take your point about Schwartz and Hutchinson. I consider Hutchinson a witness and not a suspect.

Cheers John

[curious4]

Think we may find he was a journalist

Very good :-)! At least the story about who wrote the Dear Boss letter would be right!

C4

[packers stem]

Perhaps we should check the records for a Mr J. T. Ripper?

C4

Think we may find he was a journalist

[curious4]

Perhaps we should check the records for a Mr J. T. Ripper?

C4

[packers stem]

But yeah some have a pretty low threshold for "Major Suspect".

Lol,no they're not in my mind, they're right down there with ' Mr local no surgical skill ' but they seem to be for some...thankfully they haven't signed the wall though but if they had we'd have been stuck with them.

[GUT]

Great minds think alike

Or there's the one about fools, I know which category I fall into.

But yeah some have a pretty low threshold for "Major Suspect".

[GUT]

Great minds think alike

Or there's the one about fools, I know which category I fall into.

[belinda]

So Lewis carrol is a major suspect?

Van Gogh is a major suspect?

Great minds think alike

[belinda]

So that would make Lewis Carroll a serious suspect?