Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If you could only ask five yes-or-no questions...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Damaso Marte
    replied
    1. Was Eddowes killed by the same person as Nichols?
    2. Was Kelly killed by the same person as Nichols?

    These are my first two questions. Unlike similar questions such as "did the same killer kill the C-5", both a yes an a no answer immediately teach me something.

    Based on the responses here, I would probably start asking about various eyewitnesses, asking if they saw the killer. I am less optimistic than the rest of you about being able to find the identity of the real killer based on 5 questions, so I would aim to solve mysteries about the cases rather than ID the killer.

    Leave a comment:


  • gnote
    replied
    Originally posted by DJA View Post
    Truth of the matter is that we have an enormous amount of evidence.

    Once the misinformation is discarded,we only have one person left.

    It is not my intention to troll or disrupt this Forum.

    Last go at this unless requested.

    Yes.
    No.
    No.
    No.
    No.
    I don't spend enough time here to know who is trolling. Based upon your worthless response i can gather you're full of ****.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    On "Star Trek" there was an episode about an artifical intelligence that could answer any question put to it. In keeping with this sci-fi flavor, here are my questions for The Guardian of Forever:

    1) Was Jack the Ripper a human male?
    2) Were the killings performed for the purpose of eliminating an alien parasite?
    3) Did the murders cease because Jack the Ripper was abducted by exfraferrestrials?
    4) Was Jack the Ripper a "terminator" robot from the future?
    5) Were the killings performed for the purpose of harvesting human organs to feed Earth's alien overlords?
    :-D ;-)
    Last edited by Pcdunn; 06-04-2015, 04:24 PM. Reason: typo

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Originally posted by gnote View Post
    While there are a lot of mysteries surrounding the case we’d all like answers to, my angle would be trying to narrow down who the killer’s identity through a process of elimination for as much that could be accomplished in 5 questions.

    1) Was the murder more than 32 years old? (I’m sure a better number could be selected, but it’s a starting point. With this anybody 31 and younger could be eliminated)
    2) Was Jack the Ripper Jewish? (perhaps a better question would be if the murderer was born outside of England but that’s debatable )
    3) Was the killer incarcerated between the years 1888-1892? (if the answer is yes his name is in the records somewhere. If no, anybody jailed or put in an asylum during that period can be eliminated)
    4) Was the ripper responsible for more than 5 murders after 1888? (more applicable as a follow-up if the answer to #3 is negative.
    5) Was the killer alive in the year 1896? (again, a better number could probably be used but it would also eliminate a fair number of potential suspects either way.
    Truth of the matter is that we have an enormous amount of evidence.

    Once the misinformation is discarded,we only have one person left.

    It is not my intention to troll or disrupt this Forum.

    Last go at this unless requested.

    Yes.
    No.
    No.
    No.
    No.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by Barnaby View Post
    Beowulf's first question "Was it Kosminski?" is the correct strategy but should be used in all five questions. I would ask Tom the omniscient entity five "Was it (insert suspect)?" questions.

    Best case scenario: The identity of Jack the Ripper is revealed.

    Worst case (Next best?) scenario: Most of our favorite theories are decimated. Could you imagine if Kosminski, Druitt, Hutch, Kelly, and Cross were conclusively eliminated as suspects? Would Casebook survive? Would we be left debating if Lechmere is still viable because the question asked about Cross?

    Seriously, the addition by subtraction advantage of asking about five "suspects" is the way to go in my opinion.
    What if the multi-killer theorists are correct and there wasn't a 'Jack the Ripper'? You would still come away from the Q&A thinking there was, albeit it with a shortened list of suspects.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Steadmund Brand View Post
    I was going to ask for your wig and gown,,,however i'm too fat for the gown and have way too much hair for the wig

    Steadmuind Brand
    Gowns are actually sold by height and if you are say 5'11" one size fits all from the anorexic to extreme obese.

    I had a mate with a wild Afro and his wig sort of sat up on top of this 6" of hair.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    1. Was Bury the Ripper?
    2. Was the Torso Killer a Ripper suspect?
    3. Did Jack kill Liz Stride?
    4. Did Jack write the GSG?
    5. Would Jack have been anything like as infamous without someone coming up with the Jack the Ripper name?

    Leave a comment:


  • gnote
    replied
    While there are a lot of mysteries surrounding the case we’d all like answers to, my angle would be trying to narrow down who the killer’s identity through a process of elimination for as much that could be accomplished in 5 questions.

    1) Was the murder more than 32 years old? (I’m sure a better number could be selected, but it’s a starting point. With this anybody 31 and younger could be eliminated)
    2) Was Jack the Ripper Jewish? (perhaps a better question would be if the murderer was born outside of England but that’s debatable )
    3) Was the killer incarcerated between the years 1888-1892? (if the answer is yes his name is in the records somewhere. If no, anybody jailed or put in an asylum during that period can be eliminated)
    4) Was the ripper responsible for more than 5 murders after 1888? (more applicable as a follow-up if the answer to #3 is negative.
    5) Was the killer alive in the year 1896? (again, a better number could probably be used but it would also eliminate a fair number of potential suspects either way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steadmund Brand
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Do you bowl
    Where the kids little brats
    Which case was your biggest win
    Can I have your wig and gown

    [Well t was Montie]
    I was going to ask for your wig and gown,,,however i'm too fat for the gown and have way too much hair for the wig

    Steadmuind Brand

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Originally posted by Mort Belfry View Post
    Going for a more general overview:
    N
    Y
    N
    N
    Y
    N
    N

    Leave a comment:


  • Mort Belfry
    replied
    Going for a more general overview:

    1. Is the real Jack the Ripper currently suspected in a public forum?

    2. Does Jack the Ripper's known first name start before N in the alphabet?

    3. Does Jack the Ripper's known surname start before N in the alphabet?

    4a. (If yes is the answer to the second question) Does Jack the Ripper's known first name start before H in the alphabet?

    4b. (If no is the answer to the second question) Does Jack the Ripper's known first name start before T in the alphabet?

    5a. (If yes is the answer to the third question) Does Jack the Ripper's known surname start before H in the alphabet?

    5b. (If no is the answer to the third question) Does Jack the Ripper's known surname start before T in the alphabet?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    5 Q's

    Hello Harry. Nice idea.

    What of:

    1. Did Isenschmid kill Polly/Annie?

    2. Was Kate's son connected to the brothel at Cleveland st?

    3. Did Lave see what happened to Liz?

    4. Did Fleming kill "MJK"?

    5. Was "MJK" an informant?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Rosella
    replied
    1. Was Jack the Ripper Jewish?

    2. Did he use a knife in his everyday occupation or trade?

    3 Did Jack write the GSG ?

    4. Was Jack incapacitated or dead after 1888 ?

    5 Were any of the C-5 victims known to him?

    Leave a comment:


  • martin wilson
    replied
    Talk about an omniscient entity and Lo! Tom appears.

    My five.

    1. Did Pearly Poll know Nathan Kaminsky?
    2. Was 'Lipski' a slur between differing members of the Judaen faith?
    3. Is Emily Burrell the Emily Rosina Burrell found not guilty of child neglect in 1892?
    4.Was Anne Chapman scared to stay in the lodging house?
    5.Will MY book entitled Smallpox and Other Diseases I Like ever get accepted by a publisher?

    Thanks for the thread, all the best.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    [QUOTE=Barnaby;342562]Beowulf's first question "Was it Kosminski?" is the correct strategy but should be used in all five questions. I would ask Tom the omniscient entity five "Was it (insert suspect)?" questions.

    Best case scenario: The identity of Jack the Ripper is revealed.

    Worst case (Next best?) scenario: Most of our favorite theories are decimated. Could you imagine if Kosminski, Druitt, Hutch, Kelly, and Cross were conclusively eliminated as suspects? Would Casebook survive? Would we be left debating if Lechmere is still viable because the question asked about Cross?

    Seriously, the addition by subtraction advantage of asking about five "suspects" is the way to go in my opinion.[/QUOTES
    There will never be a shortage of arm chair detectives who will convince themselves they have solved this mystery so yes casebook will survive in fact it will go from strength to strength .It's only a matter of time before we have someone claiming "case closed" again armed with everything (apart from any real facts or evidence)the suspect will be analysed and discussed on here people will fall out books will be written documentaries made .I'm quite surprised no one has tried an alien abduction angle on this case yet but there's always time!.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X