Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If you could only ask five yes-or-no questions...
Collapse
X
-
[QUOTE=Barnaby;342562]Beowulf's first question "Was it Kosminski?" is the correct strategy but should be used in all five questions. I would ask Tom the omniscient entity five "Was it (insert suspect)?" questions.
Best case scenario: The identity of Jack the Ripper is revealed.
Worst case (Next best?) scenario: Most of our favorite theories are decimated. Could you imagine if Kosminski, Druitt, Hutch, Kelly, and Cross were conclusively eliminated as suspects? Would Casebook survive? Would we be left debating if Lechmere is still viable because the question asked about Cross?
Seriously, the addition by subtraction advantage of asking about five "suspects" is the way to go in my opinion.[/QUOTES
There will never be a shortage of arm chair detectives who will convince themselves they have solved this mystery so yes casebook will survive in fact it will go from strength to strength .It's only a matter of time before we have someone claiming "case closed" again armed with everything (apart from any real facts or evidence)the suspect will be analysed and discussed on here people will fall out books will be written documentaries made .I'm quite surprised no one has tried an alien abduction angle on this case yet but there's always time!.Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
-
Talk about an omniscient entity and Lo! Tom appears.
My five.
1. Did Pearly Poll know Nathan Kaminsky?
2. Was 'Lipski' a slur between differing members of the Judaen faith?
3. Is Emily Burrell the Emily Rosina Burrell found not guilty of child neglect in 1892?
4.Was Anne Chapman scared to stay in the lodging house?
5.Will MY book entitled Smallpox and Other Diseases I Like ever get accepted by a publisher?
Thanks for the thread, all the best.
Comment
-
Going for a more general overview:
1. Is the real Jack the Ripper currently suspected in a public forum?
2. Does Jack the Ripper's known first name start before N in the alphabet?
3. Does Jack the Ripper's known surname start before N in the alphabet?
4a. (If yes is the answer to the second question) Does Jack the Ripper's known first name start before H in the alphabet?
4b. (If no is the answer to the second question) Does Jack the Ripper's known first name start before T in the alphabet?
5a. (If yes is the answer to the third question) Does Jack the Ripper's known surname start before H in the alphabet?
5b. (If no is the answer to the third question) Does Jack the Ripper's known surname start before T in the alphabet?"Damn it, Doc! Why did you have to tear up that letter? If only I had more time... Wait a minute, I got all the time I want! I got a time machine!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostDo you bowl
Where the kids little brats
Which case was your biggest win
Can I have your wig and gown
[Well t was Montie]
Steadmuind Brand"The truth is what is, and what should be is a fantasy. A terrible, terrible lie that someone gave to the people long ago."- Lenny Bruce
Comment
-
While there are a lot of mysteries surrounding the case we’d all like answers to, my angle would be trying to narrow down who the killer’s identity through a process of elimination for as much that could be accomplished in 5 questions.
1) Was the murder more than 32 years old? (I’m sure a better number could be selected, but it’s a starting point. With this anybody 31 and younger could be eliminated)
2) Was Jack the Ripper Jewish? (perhaps a better question would be if the murderer was born outside of England but that’s debatable )
3) Was the killer incarcerated between the years 1888-1892? (if the answer is yes his name is in the records somewhere. If no, anybody jailed or put in an asylum during that period can be eliminated)
4) Was the ripper responsible for more than 5 murders after 1888? (more applicable as a follow-up if the answer to #3 is negative.
5) Was the killer alive in the year 1896? (again, a better number could probably be used but it would also eliminate a fair number of potential suspects either way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steadmund Brand View PostI was going to ask for your wig and gown,,,however i'm too fat for the gown and have way too much hair for the wig
Steadmuind Brand
I had a mate with a wild Afro and his wig sort of sat up on top of this 6" of hair.G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barnaby View PostBeowulf's first question "Was it Kosminski?" is the correct strategy but should be used in all five questions. I would ask Tom the omniscient entity five "Was it (insert suspect)?" questions.
Best case scenario: The identity of Jack the Ripper is revealed.
Worst case (Next best?) scenario: Most of our favorite theories are decimated. Could you imagine if Kosminski, Druitt, Hutch, Kelly, and Cross were conclusively eliminated as suspects? Would Casebook survive? Would we be left debating if Lechmere is still viable because the question asked about Cross?
Seriously, the addition by subtraction advantage of asking about five "suspects" is the way to go in my opinion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gnote View PostWhile there are a lot of mysteries surrounding the case we’d all like answers to, my angle would be trying to narrow down who the killer’s identity through a process of elimination for as much that could be accomplished in 5 questions.
1) Was the murder more than 32 years old? (I’m sure a better number could be selected, but it’s a starting point. With this anybody 31 and younger could be eliminated)
2) Was Jack the Ripper Jewish? (perhaps a better question would be if the murderer was born outside of England but that’s debatable )
3) Was the killer incarcerated between the years 1888-1892? (if the answer is yes his name is in the records somewhere. If no, anybody jailed or put in an asylum during that period can be eliminated)
4) Was the ripper responsible for more than 5 murders after 1888? (more applicable as a follow-up if the answer to #3 is negative.
5) Was the killer alive in the year 1896? (again, a better number could probably be used but it would also eliminate a fair number of potential suspects either way.
Once the misinformation is discarded,we only have one person left.
It is not my intention to troll or disrupt this Forum.
Last go at this unless requested.
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
No.My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
-
On "Star Trek" there was an episode about an artifical intelligence that could answer any question put to it. In keeping with this sci-fi flavor, here are my questions for The Guardian of Forever:
1) Was Jack the Ripper a human male?
2) Were the killings performed for the purpose of eliminating an alien parasite?
3) Did the murders cease because Jack the Ripper was abducted by exfraferrestrials?
4) Was Jack the Ripper a "terminator" robot from the future?
5) Were the killings performed for the purpose of harvesting human organs to feed Earth's alien overlords?
:-D ;-)Pat D. https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...rt/reading.gif
---------------
Von Konigswald: Jack the Ripper plays shuffleboard. -- Happy Birthday, Wanda June by Kurt Vonnegut, c.1970.
---------------
Comment
-
Originally posted by DJA View PostTruth of the matter is that we have an enormous amount of evidence.
Once the misinformation is discarded,we only have one person left.
It is not my intention to troll or disrupt this Forum.
Last go at this unless requested.
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
No.
Comment
Comment