Originally posted by lynn cates
View Post
Jack the Ripper: Man or Myth?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello CD. Thanks.
Although I have said this about a thousand times, here goes one thousand one.
It is NOT a matter of someone looking for amusement and who then begins killing. It is, rather, a matter of someone who wishes to kill and use another as a cover.
Cheers.
LC
To which I am always forced to reply a cover for whom? I know you have a favorite crazed individual but overall if the police didn't know who was doing the killings then trying to pass the blame on to another individual really doesn't seem necessary.
Also, my original point is still valid regardless of a cover theory. It wasn't just the killing that was required but mutilation as well. I am not sure that it is a given that even if someone is a killer that they have the stomach to rip out intestines even if it is required as part of the cover.
c.d.
Leave a comment:
-
cold blooded killer
Hello Jason. Thanks.
Why would such a second killer--if he existed--be a lunatic? Why not just a cold blooded killer?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
1001
Hello CD. Thanks.
Although I have said this about a thousand times, here goes one thousand one.
It is NOT a matter of someone looking for amusement and who then begins killing. It is, rather, a matter of someone who wishes to kill and use another as a cover.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Baxter
Hello Harry. Thanks.
Unfortunately, for that theory, Kate's inclusion was doubted, almost from the beginning.
Where do you suppose Baxter got his information?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Hello Pinkmoon,
That question has been debated numerous times. Those who favor multiple killers will say that regardless of the odds if it happened then no matter what the odds the question of probability has been rendered moot.
c.d.
Leave a comment:
-
I wonder what the actual odds are of having to like minded lunatics in the same area at the same time doing the same thing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Harry.
"I don't understand the need to complicate matters by introducing a copycat murderer, who now needs to be accounted for, instead of considering the perceived differences in circumstances between the two kills."
The need is to address Baxter's remarks at inquest that Kate was possibly the work of an imitator.
Cheers.
LC
c.d.
Leave a comment:
-
G'day, Lynn.
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostThe need is to address Baxter's remarks at inquest that Kate was possibly the work of an imitator.
Leave a comment:
-
imitator
Hello Harry.
"I don't understand the need to complicate matters by introducing a copycat murderer, who now needs to be accounted for, instead of considering the perceived differences in circumstances between the two kills."
The need is to address Baxter's remarks at inquest that Kate was possibly the work of an imitator.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
reproduction
Hello Kensei. Thanks.
Well, if one is intentionally trying to reproduce something . . .
If they were the same, why were the cuts unskilful in Kate's case?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostReal, in the sense that there were at least three victims, likely four, and possibly five, who all fell to the same hand.
Originally posted by kensei View PostAnnie and Kate both had their intestines lifted out and tossed over their right shoulders. How likely is it that that was done by two different people?
True enough. Eddowes' abdominal wounds were more haphazard than Chapman's, but the actual disembowelment was no less skilled. I don't understand the need to complicate matters by introducing a copycat murderer, who now needs to be accounted for, instead of considering the perceived differences in circumstances between the two kills. For instance, if Jack had been fumbling with the added layers of Eddowes' clothing that night, this could easily explain why the mutilations were sloppier than before.
Leave a comment:
-
The work of a very disturbed individual who probably had some basic knowledge of anatomy not necessarily local who snuffed it very shortly after last murder or was locked up and didn't own a shawl.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Harry. Thanks for starting this thread.
You are right that I don't see all by the same hand. My point of departure is that:
1. Polly and Annie were a series of two.
2. Kate was a TRUE copycat.
Other than that, I am quite flexible. In particular, I am excited about Tom Wescott's work on the earlier murders and the notion of a violent thug. Even better if he were associated with a brothel.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Although I think it is one killer (due to the closeness of the dates, and the crescendo of increasingly horrifying mutilations) I am not unaware that it could be simply a set of five or more separately committed murders. Many of the JFK Conspiracy theories feel the killing of Police Officer J. P. Tippett (supposedly committed by Lee Harvey Oswald) was actually not committed by the same party who murdered JFK (obviously such a theory is predicated on the assumption that Oswald was not the President's assassin, nor connected to the assassination). So yes, I could see a similar view with the Ripper killings.
Jeff
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: