Whitechapel Murders police 'coincidences' with holidays/starting/quiting jobs

[drstrange169]

"... 1881 census shows only 7 Lipskis in all of Britain."

And one of them was Dr. Bagster Phillips's neighbour in Spital Square!

[Ginger]

I believe Schwartz was not called Lipski but instead the killer tried to 'frame' a 'lipski' there and then.

I seem to recall that someone at the time (was it Abberline?) speculated that perhaps the ruffian was shouting "Lipski!" to an accomplice of that name. Per http://www.britishsurnames.co.uk/surname/lipski/stats, the 1881 census shows only 7 Lipskis in all of Britain.

[Batman]

Politically motivated in what manner?

Warren/police handling of the semetic communities in London.

On the night of the double murder we have not just 1 but 2 anti-semetic moments.

Schwartz is called "Lipski".

Goulston Street Graffito.

I believe Schwartz was not called Lipski but instead the killer tried to 'frame' a 'lipski' there and then.

I believe Stride suddenly realized her dilemma. Before she could scream help, the murderer had to silence her. He saw Schwartz at the same time. He knew he had to kill Stride or face identification. So cried out Lipski and then took out Stride with his signature MO. He then ran away. He wasn't disturbed by Diemschutz at all and had fled well before him (otherwise he would have had time to complete more of his MO).

Furthermore he tries to frame a 'Lipski' by writing the graffito or he knew where the graffito was and tossed the bloody rag from Eddowes there to cause more problems.

The political motivation is the failure of the government to stop semetic culture/people from 'destroying' london. If these prostitutes where known to have served some jews, JtR may have punished them for that while at the same time trying to make these series of murders an example of Jewish 'evil'.

Warren was clearly worried that such talk could literally bring riots again to the streets.

[GUT]

Politically motivated in what manner?

[Batman]

Paul Begg in his 'the facts' book mentioned tongue in cheek that Anderson went on holiday or was on holiday during each of the murders. Warren was also on holiday for the first week of September.

Anderson's appointment occurred extremely close to the murder of Nichols within a matter of hours.

Warren quit within a matter of hours before Mary Kelly's murder.

It is easy to portray JtR as a lust murderer up to his own private business with modern 'forensic profiling'. However then we must conceed the above are just 'coincidences' that play no part in the murders.

Yet look at how simple some answers are to the JtR case if we say “The murders ended because Warren quit” or “The murders started because of Anderson's appointment”. Maybe we shouldn't say “started” there but use the word 'reaction'.

JtR reacted to Anderson's appointment with a murder.
JtR reacted to Warren's quiting by stopping.

Then we have the Goulston Street graffito with its political religious race agenda.

Do we not find an 'initator' for JtR's crimes in relation to political appointments or the actions of said appointments taking a 'holiday' prior to a murder?

I am not saying that JtR isn't a lust murderer. What I am saying though is that if JtR was reacting to politics (and even Shaw pointed out how JtR himself had taken political matters of poverty in hand with his notorious slayings) then this changes the complexion of the killings completely.

Warren himself realized the significance of the graffito in terms of its political/social statement and the problems it could cause if connected to JtR.

Do we just say coincidence? Or was JtR politically motivated?

I think its generally accepted that JtR didn't write any letters. Yet in the above context it seems odd that he wouldn't taunt them directly in writing.

Any comments?