Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How would YOU catch the Ripper?
Collapse
X
-
I definitely recall watching a documentary in the 1990's which mentioned the nascent underground as a potential getaway route. I think it was maybrick-related one. I assume it was absolutely not credible but have never heard about the underground in the context of the ripper again.
-
Yes, wasn't this in its infancy?
Cheers
Dave
Leave a comment:
-
Time travel, ugh. That makes it too easy for a stake out. Harry mentions the butterfly effect and I think it sets up a much more interesting scenario. Suppose that you stake out/follow Nichols on the night of her murder and nothing happens because the killer noticed that there were others around. The very next night some other prostitute was killed Ripper style in Whitechapel. From here on, Jack is still working but the timeline and the victims are totally different. So, on one hand, we have the benefit of hindsight as to the fact that there is a serial killer, some idea of his motive, victim type, and some suggestions for the police to do better, but we have no idea as to when he will strike next. Now what? We can't just set up shop at Mitre Square.
Having people on top of buildings is a good idea. I also would plant people in the lodging houses, particularly those Tom Wescott identified in his book. Perhaps underground as well.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Beowulf View PostProblem is if any of us did there would be no forum to report this onNo offence, CB!
Really enjoying some of the ideas put forward so far. Even if the topic did get inevitably sidetracked by Godwin's Law.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostLet's say you could fire up the wayback machine and revisit Whitechapel during the murders. How would you set about catching 'Jack?' Bearing in mind that embroiling yourself in the case could cause you to become a suspect... or worse.
At which point would you try to catch Jack red-handed? How would your own theory of the canonical victims factor into things?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostLet's say you could fire up the wayback machine and revisit Whitechapel during the murders. How would you set about catching 'Jack?' Bearing in mind that embroiling yourself in the case could cause you to become a suspect... or worse.
At which point would you try to catch Jack red-handed? How would your own theory of the canonical victims factor into things?
I also would have employed real prostitutes to hang around probable ripper pick up areas, wait to be picked up, and then either trailed by detectives, or take the client to preselected places where detectives were hiding, to see if the client (the ripper) would attack them.
I would also check out extensively the local shipyards, navy, merchant marine offices, to see if any of the working schedules allowed for sailors to mainly be gone in the middle of the month (when the ripper only killed) and also to see if any of these men had histories of attacks on women.( I think if you were going to try to pin down the rippers profile, it would include, former military/navy, local though away during certain times of the month, very strong, skill with knife-ships dr/ butcher cook etc., frequents pubs, prostitutes-all common attributes to sailors, seamen.) And of course there is my favorite Peaked Cap man-AKA Sailor man. "like something a sailor would wear". : )
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Robert View PostAre you allowed just the one trip for the Ripper, but another trip to do other things? If just one trip, then you'd have to sacrifice Tabram. You'd need to be in Austria because about the time that Tabram was being murdered, Hitler was being conceived. You could send Hitler's dad on a wild goose chase away from home, or kill Hitler's dad, or whatever.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostG'day Bridewell
But by then at least four others are dead, and at best you've caught Mary Jane's killer, we'd still argue forever over were there other killers.
Leave a comment:
-
G'day Jon
Serial killers are the exception, not the rule.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RockySullivan View Posthi gutgood point....i think most prostitute targeting serial killers tend to be blue collar...and from the old threads ive read here it seems like the vigilance committees were made up of men who were willing to patrol for very little pay...more likely lusk status was more an exception than a rule?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostG'day Rocky
That depends on what type of person he was.
If he was an insane person, no I don't think he would.
If he was a working class man, I doubt it, the committee seems to have been middle management types, Lusk ran his own construction business.
If he was a Toff or a Royal No.
So only if he was of that similar class to Lusk, remember 1880's England was very class conscious.good point....i think most prostitute targeting serial killers tend to be blue collar...and from the old threads ive read here it seems like the vigilance committees were made up of men who were willing to patrol for very little pay...more likely lusk status was more an exception than a rule?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: