What are the chances of….?
Collapse
X
-
The issue with the Lawende sighting are not limited to the man he says he saw, but couldnt be sure he could identify with 2 weeks time,....its also with his ID of the woman he says was Kate. We have Packer saying he identified Stride, we have have Mrs Long saying she identified Annie, we have Brown saying he identified Stride, we have Hutchinson saying he identified Mary with Astrakan, we have Carrie Maxwell saying she identified Mary out at 8am on Friday...yet we cannot be sure of any of these sightings and ID's. And thats just a few of these "ID's".
-
Scratch any "fact" in the Ripper case and you will quickly reveal a series of assumptions and decisions about which conflicting sources to trust or which conflicting possibilities to believe. This is why we are still talking about this case almost 150 years later.
A very small number of Ripperologists are doing original research that may reveal new facts about the case. 99% of us are just telling stories and debating the plausibility of these stories. That's probably all the field will ever be. It's why we come here and we love it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by etenguy View Post
Hi Lewis C
I think I need to go to the book. In the review the reference to Deeming is restricted to:
According to Millington, Deeming was in Plymouth in early September 1888 and left there on 27 September 1888. He was using the name Lawson. The Double Event was two days later.
I could not find any reference to dates around the earlier murders. I think we should probably stop on this thread and start a new one about Deeming if there is more to discuss. Though as yet, not seen anything that moves me to look deeper. Perhaps if I find and read the book I might start one.
The book is available for about £50 on Amazon, so will wait until i can find a more affordable copy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
I found it. It's in Ripperologist 142 (Feb 2015), page 91. It's a review by Paul Begg of a book about Deeming by Roger Billington called The Other Jack the Ripper. I'm guessing that you either have this issue of Ripperologist in your computer or know where to find it online, or both, but if not, I can help you find it.
I think I need to go to the book. In the review the reference to Deeming is restricted to:
According to Millington, Deeming was in Plymouth in early September 1888 and left there on 27 September 1888. He was using the name Lawson. The Double Event was two days later.
I could not find any reference to dates around the earlier murders. I think we should probably stop on this thread and start a new one about Deeming if there is more to discuss. Though as yet, not seen anything that moves me to look deeper. Perhaps if I find and read the book I might start one.
The book is available for about £50 on Amazon, so will wait until i can find a more affordable copy.Last edited by etenguy; 07-07-2023, 10:11 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
I found it. It's in Ripperologist 142 (Feb 2015), page 91. It's a review by Paul Begg of a book about Deeming by Roger Billington called The Other Jack the Ripper. I'm guessing that you either have this issue of Ripperologist in your computer or know where to find it online, or both, but if not, I can help you find it.
Originally posted by GBinOz View PostHi Lewis C,
There has been more recent research that points to Deeming:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQxY...el=DarkHistory
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by etenguy View Post
Hi Lewis C
That's interesting - I missed that. I had thought it was established he was in South Africa. Maybe a Deeming thread would be interesting soon, I'll see if I can find the book / review you mention.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
Hi Lewis C,
There has been more recent research that points to Deeming:
I am personally unimpressed by the shawl's chain of custody. However, I look at Deeming's sister-in-law's statement that Deeming was living in Birkenhead at the time of the murder, with access to London by rail, the testimony by the dressmaker that he was in London at the time of the Eddowes murder, the match with the FBI profile, the "seafarer with a fair moustache" description by Lawende and the match with the height described by Levy, the "strange eyes", the resemblance of the photograph of Deeming to the sketch associated with the Kelly murder, and Deeming's statement that he had achieved revenge for his syphilise infection . How many of the more popular suspects tick this many boxes? If the DNA on the stamp could be matched to Deeming's wife the argument would become compelling, but that eventuality would seem unlikely at best
Cheers, George
In addition to that, Deeming is a known murderer who slit the throats of his victims. I think that he's in the top 10 of most likely of the named suspects to be JtR.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
Hi Lewis C,
There has been more recent research that points to Deeming:
I am personally unimpressed by the shawl's chain of custody. However, I look at Deeming's sister-in-law's statement that Deeming was living in Birkenhead at the time of the murder, with access to London by rail, the testimony by the dressmaker that he was in London at the time of the Eddowes murder, the match with the FBI profile, the "seafarer with a fair moustache" description by Lawende and the match with the height described by Levy, the "strange eyes", the resemblance of the photograph of Deeming to the sketch associated with the Kelly murder, and Deeming's statement that he had achieved revenge for his syphilise infection . How many of the more popular suspects tick this many boxes? If the DNA on the stamp could be matched to Deeming's wife the argument would become compelling, but that eventuality would seem unlikely at best
Cheers, George
Will watch the linked video - thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
Hi etenguy,
There has been research (I think from about 10 years ago) that claims to have proven that Deeming was in England and not in prison at the time of the murders. I think that I remember Paul Begg saying in a book review in Ripperologist that this new research succeeded in proving that Deeming was in England and free.
That's interesting - I missed that. I had thought it was established he was in South Africa. Maybe a Deeming thread would be interesting soon, I'll see if I can find the book / review you mention.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
Hi etenguy,
There has been research (I think from about 10 years ago) that claims to have proven that Deeming was in England and not in prison at the time of the murders. I think that I remember Paul Begg saying in a book review in Ripperologist that this new research succeeded in proving that Deeming was in England and free.
There has been more recent research that points to Deeming:
I am personally unimpressed by the shawl's chain of custody. However, I look at Deeming's sister-in-law's statement that Deeming was living in Birkenhead at the time of the murder, with access to London by rail, the testimony by the dressmaker that he was in London at the time of the Eddowes murder, the match with the FBI profile, the "seafarer with a fair moustache" description by Lawende and the match with the height described by Levy, the "strange eyes", the resemblance of the photograph of Deeming to the sketch associated with the Kelly murder, and Deeming's statement that he had achieved revenge for his syphilise infection . How many of the more popular suspects tick this many boxes? If the DNA on the stamp could be matched to Deeming's wife the argument would become compelling, but that eventuality would seem unlikely at best
Cheers, George
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: