The subject of Jack's "anatomical knowledge"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • doris
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    The Anatomy Act allowed bona fide persons to take organs and bodies freely from morturies and workhouse mortuaries for research.

    The way the uterus was removed from chapman suggests it was removed for research.

    Someone posted on here that almost any organ could be obtained from any of these locations by 10am every morning.

    The bodies of Eddowes and Chapman were left at the mortuaries for some 12 hours before post mortems were carried out, need i say anymore

    Do you really, honestly think that ripper victims orgams were removed PM for research purposes?

    Or am I missunderstanding you ?

    doris

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Me too. I remember an episode of the TV show Good Times about that.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Assuming the killer (or killers) was getting a thrill out of evisscerating, would this not also suggest he could see what he was doing in order to thoroughly enjoy it? If it was complete darkness, then there is no enjoyment.

    So, here's my point. If the environment was complete darkness, then this could support an agenda of collecting parts. If the environment had ambient light, then this suggests thrill in the action.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • The Grave Maurice
    replied
    Myth? Maybe. But I still remember stories like this from my youth.

    Leave a comment:


  • GregBaron
    replied
    Cat Food...

    And more nutritious too from what I understand........it still seems odd to me one could live off a business in East London 1888 feeding Cats........I understand the vermin thing and I guess there weren't that many good table scraps around but still..............for some reason it seems like a Monty Python skit...........

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    That's more of a myth than anything, when you consider that canned pet food is more expensive than most canned human food.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • The Grave Maurice
    replied
    Several commentators have observed that cat's meat undoubtedly found its way into the stew pots of more than a few End End families---just as poor people have been known to dine on tinned dog food in our day.

    Leave a comment:


  • GregBaron
    replied
    Vermin...........

    Good point Grave one..............but the felines may have done better work on empty stomachs...........but who's to say some didn't buy a little horsemeat to feed the family.........tell em it's prime rib and grind it up in the stew.............

    Leave a comment:


  • The Grave Maurice
    replied
    Given the sanitary conditions that prevailed in the East End at the time, I imagine that cats were pretty much a necessity in order to keep down the vermin.

    Leave a comment:


  • GregBaron
    replied
    Horsemeat........

    Thanks Grave Maurice,

    Didn't realize the cats were treated so well in such a poverty stricken area............of course how successful such a business was I couldn't venture to guess.........?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Grave Maurice
    replied
    Originally posted by GregBaron View Post
    ...and/or explain to me what a Cat Meat man is? Pardon my ignorance, but did people eat these poor felines or is this a euphemism of some sort?
    Cat's meat men sold meat for cats, rather than the meat of cats, i.e., they sold skewers of (usually) horsemeat as pet food.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    The quotes from "The Lancet" are to be found in Paul Begg"s "The Facts"-see under index "The Lancet".
    I am actually quite surprised at your interpretation of these matters, Ben.I am not saying that because you are not medically qualified either .
    I always assume myself that Dr Phillips and Dr Brown not only knew a good deal more than I do about the victim"s injuries having actually seen them,but were both trained as "surgeons" as well as having acted in the roles of qualified and experienced police surgeons in "H" division and The City Of London Police respectively.These were the two police surgeons who were directly involved with victims bearing such injuries as alerted them to the murderer having had a degree of medical expertise and who subsequently wrote lengthy autopsy reports for the inquests---autopsy reports that can still be studied in depth---unlike quotes from newspapers of the time.
    The Lancet too was and is a highly respected and prestigious medical journal.
    Anyway,I leave the discussion now, with the following quote,from "The Lancet"

    dated 29th September 1888 :

    .......the incisions were cleanly cut,avoiding the rectum,and dividing the vagina low enough to avoid injury to the cervix uteri.Obviously the work of an expert-of one at least,who had such knowledge of anatomical or pathological examinations to be enabled to secure the pelvic organs with one sweep of the knife..."

    The speed with which the killer worked also

    "pointed to the improbability of anyone but an expert performing the mutilations described in so apparently skilful a manner."

    Leave a comment:


  • GregBaron
    replied
    Hardiman.......

    Thanks Tom, that rings a bell, I think he just seemed to me the kind of guy we were looking for, a relatively obscure angry little meat cutter.........but again, evidence?.............Not much...

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Hi Greg,

    You're referring to James Hardiman, a suspect proposed by Rob Hills and put forth in a series of essays by him in Ripperologist. I've never understood Hills interest in this suspect. He seems to have also held suspicions against George Morris of Mitre Square fame.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • GregBaron
    replied
    Butcher Baker Candlestick Maker.......

    Hey all,

    Not sure about ‘knowledge’ but it’s obvious Jtr was a psycho familiar with a knife and not some delicate, dandy priss pot. No highly educated, sheltered Nobleman here. I’m thinking at best he was some course handed member of the lower orders or an aspiring middle class bloke. I believe butcher is a very solid suggestion. Also, and forgive me as this probably exists on another thread, but whatever happened to the Cat Meat man? I remember a suggestion of a scoundrel that lived at 29 Hanbury or perhaps next door that had a wife and family and probably contacted syphilis from a prostitute. For some intuitive reason, this relatively unknown miscreant seemed an excellent suspect to me. Can anyone point me to something on this guy, I’ve forgotten his name, and/or explain to me what a Cat Meat man is? Pardon my ignorance, but did people eat these poor felines or is this a euphemism of some sort? I know, probably should start another thread.....

    Greg

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X