Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pentagram

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bob Hinton
    replied
    Poor little Danny boy

    Daniel complains in his last post about people 'attacking' him. Perhaps he would like to read his second post on this thread and just remind us who is doing the attacking? Notice his last sentence: "THE LAST THING I WOULD DO IS INSULT YOU". Well this is only the second thing you wrote and already the insults are flying.

    Here are a few more insults Danny boy didn’t make:

    “sorry to re-burst your bubble and you should review the autopsy report before inserting your foot in the mouth.”

    “Bob, your the resident genius here.”

    “your worthless expert opinion”

    “Bob, i expect my grammar correction soon... thats all your really good at Dan”

    “Bob the 8th Grade English Professor”

    If you want to come on these boards and start acting like an uncouth (look it up) lout then be my guest, but I play Big Boys Rules. Start making silly, offensive remarks and I will slice you into serving size helpings. You do not have the wit, the intelligence or the ability to mix it with me in a war of words. I certainly wouldn’t dream of engaging you in a battle of wits – it would be most un-sporting to attack an unarmed opponent.

    So are you going to play nice or am I going to send you to the naughty step again?

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Daniel Gillotti View Post

    When I started researching the ripper murders several years ago
    Hi Dan,

    Thanks for that.

    Now we know Einstein was right.
    The theory of relativity is for sure a hard fact.

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Dan,

    I am not trying to make you feel like you can't post here. I only say that you must be aware that there is a HELL of alot of arguing on this forum, some you may not like.

    We sit here, arguing about what we all at least have in common, our fascination with the murders that occured in the late 1880's, our interest in Victorian London, and our interest in crime.

    I still have trouble seeing why you say the order of death spells NECKS, it doesn't. Neither does the order in possition.

    If you can clearify, I would appriciate it.

    Yours truly
    Last edited by corey123; 02-09-2010, 12:59 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Originally posted by j.r-ahde View Post
    Hello corey123!



    I like this post of yours!

    But just one thing; The Charles Manson murders did have some satanistic ritual themes.

    I will add the following statement, anyway; There is very, very probably nothing ritualistic with Jack the Ripper!

    All the best
    Jukka
    Hello Jukka,

    I don't think those were satanic ritualistic murders. He tried to start a race war and was too much of a coward himself to kill, so he made women, under the influence of LSD, kill for him.

    No, not satanic, only a pregeduce.

    Yours truly
    Last edited by corey123; 02-09-2010, 12:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Daniel Gillotti
    replied
    Pentagram

    Originally posted by corey123 View Post
    Dan,

    Sorry, I didn't have time to respond to you with my last reply.

    Here is a full response. For one, I think you are the one who needs to read the autopsey reports again. Second, you say I need to read them again and then agree with me?? Is this part of your plan?

    They WERE asphixiated before death and "Jack the Ripper" never attempted to severe their heads from their bodies, but if he did, I assure you he would have.

    Next, I hope you didn't join this forum to shout your ideas and think others won't debate and argue against them. I am no thorn, just someone who likes to debate on 'ripperology'.

    I think, truly think, you have lost your marbles here.

    I think you aren't going to like your stay here, the way you freak out everytime someone tries to debate your wild idea.


    Like I said before, the order of death spells NCSEK not NECKS. The order of location(clockwise) spells NSEKC not NECKS and(counterclockwise) spells NCKES, again NOT NECKS.

    You can't mis-arrange them any way you wish to fit your theory.

    Lastly, like I have stated time and time again(I will write it in bold so you might get it this time) THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A SINGLE CASE OF A SATANIC RITUALISTIC SERIAL KILLER! EVER!!!!!!


    To help you see the reasons why a killer would do some of the things you think are related to this "Black magic" crap:

    The reason why Jack most likely took the organs was to take them as trouphies, to re-live the murders.

    Also,Bob is right, you do need to correct your grammer, at least try. As you may see, my grammer is not too good, but I try to make it readable.

    In the end, your theory is not going to help get people motivated, it will help them ignore pointless topics such as this, and remember that there are some who like the fairy tales more than fact. However, if you were interested in this, you might actually do some research worth seeing.

    Good luck.

    Yours truly

    p.s I know you will snap at me like a wounded dog, but I know that is because you won't have anything logical to say in its place.
    Corey:

    I'm not going to snap on you or anyone else here including Bob the 8th Grade English Professor for my spelling lesson. I never said the murders by location would make a pentagram spelling NECKS; I did however, say by order of the C5 deaths when written out with their initials spells NECKS.

    This statement is for everyone. When I started researching the ripper murders several years ago I did alot of my research here on this forum. I spent countless hours investigating names like Prince Eddy, and many of the suspects listed on this forum; including a couple of possible suspects that I discovered then eliminated.

    I did my research without having to post threads and comments on this forum; i was more inclined in reading everyone else's thread for ideas and clues. Again as i said before i have alot of respect for everyone here, and I'm not looking for a thread war with anyone.

    This tit for tat stuff is really negative energy that has halted my research and waisted my time fending off the attackers; when i had few valid questions from others, i didn't answer them because of the constant smashing I'm getting, I'm sorry to those who are waiting for a reply i will get to you as soon as i can.

    Back on topic I wouldn't have posted the pentagram or the NECKS theories if i wasn't sure it was right; i have other information from my research and another discovery to support this. I'm not going to release or disclose any of it because the way things turned out it would be like throwing gas into the fire.

    This is going to be my last thread i will stop in to read your threads from time to time like i have been for the last 8 years.

    Corey: i attached a pentagram to this thread i made it out of arrows from the order of the C5 deaths, i hope it clarifies the discrepancy you had about the order.

    Lastly, I'm going to leave a clue for anyone interested, sort of a riddle if anyone wants to take the pentagram and the NECKS, to the next level.

    "sometimes underlined words are not always underlined words"


    Best regards to all... Dan
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Mascara & Paranoia
    replied
    I think it's a nifty coincidence and could probably get a book written about it, but as a serious theory? I just don't see why the Ripper would want the first letter pf his victims' surnames to spell 'necks'. What would be the point in that? That and these being ritualistic killings is a bit far fetched.

    The killer must've been dressed like any other man in the area at the time otherwise he'd have been caught (not necessarily in the act, but he sure as sh*t would've been a target for the police if anyone clocked him in the street looking any different from the average Joe), and these murders don't seem planned any more than the 'go out, bring knife, try my luck' stage, so I doubt whoever it was was disguised as a poorly dressed man. That and I doubt there would've been many occult books and enthusiasts in Whitechapel at the time of the murders, so where he'd have gotten the idea to perform some satanic murders from, I don't know.

    Leave a comment:


  • j.r-ahde
    replied
    Hello you all!

    Trying to get back to the topic of this thread;

    Why Jacky would have made a pentagram around the murder sites?! For the satanists from outer-space?!

    All the best
    Jukka

    Leave a comment:


  • j.r-ahde
    replied
    Hello corey123!

    Originally posted by corey123 View Post
    Dan,

    Sorry to snap at you, but I mean every word I said.

    That was nothing uncivil.

    We are ment to dispell myths, not feed them. There has NEVER been one single case of a satanic ritualistic serial killer, and I doubt there ever will.

    The names don't spell NECKS, not the order of death, nor the order of location.

    Phil,

    Maybe he was a hippe, who knows.

    Yours truly
    I like this post of yours!

    But just one thing; The Charles Manson murders did have some satanistic ritual themes.

    I will add the following statement, anyway; There is very, very probably nothing ritualistic with Jack the Ripper!

    All the best
    Jukka

    Leave a comment:


  • johns
    replied
    Jesus wept....

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Hinton View Post

    At least three of the 5 woman were disembowled (disembowelled) with severe mutilation on the body's (bodies - plural of body, not possessive) with missing organs uterus, kidney, heart...
    Hi Bob.

    You forget the colon after "organs" (I mean the punctuation, not the knobbly purple thing that poop travels through).

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Hinton
    replied
    Part 2

    Bob, your (you’re – contraction of you are – thank you for saying so) the resident genius here...let me ask you do we have a pattern here with these murders. (If you wish to ask then you must end with one of these ‘?’ – inquisitive) These Horrific (horrific) murders cannot be in your worthless expert opinion ( an opinion is either expert or worthless- pick one) worthy of something as Diabolical as a satanic ritual, human offering, black magic whatever... (are you going to finish the sentence or let us guess?)

    I don't have all the answers and i (I) never said i (I) did however, given the totality of these murders and the discovery, ( nonsense, gibberish) how their ( the) initials of their last name in order of the way they were killed (a method cannot be regulated by time)rearranges in a pentagram to spell NECKS the primary means of their deaths is something that need to be investigated.(that’s already been done at the inquests)

    I don't care if no one agrees to this and i (I) am not forcing the issue with anyone i (I)thought it was a clever discovery ( well I hope you know better now) and i(I) wanted to share it to get people motivated. ( to do what?)

    If you can go back to 1888 or after and someone, anyone, discovered what i (I)am sharing with you; don't you think the police would have said, hey, were (where) is that cop wannabe D'onston who's very interested in these murders at; ( gibberish)and didn't he brag about or practice black magic...lets question him again. (direct speech should be enclosed by inverted commas)

    Bob, i (I) expect my grammar correction soon... thats (that’s – contraction of that is) all your
    ( you’re-contraction of you are) really good at ( we usually end sentences with a full stop)

    Well overall I can give no more than 2/20. Very poor grammar, abysmal sentence construction obviously needs remedial teaching before moving on to the 8th Grade.
    Hope you found this usefull!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Hinton
    replied
    Oh dear!

    Originally posted by Daniel Gillotti View Post
    Wow....

    Here's a tip, if you want people to read what you have offererd us it might a good idea to try writing in English as that is the language most used on these boards.

    Bob:

    You must be the geniuse of this forum and i commend you on deciphering my thread... the whole near decapitation via by head or necks is impressive.

    I am so ashamed of my writing skills now, that i decided to take your grammar 101 class; only after you solve the ripper murders.

    Fortunately for me i don't have to worry about that, not in your lifetime.

    This is what i mean about deflecting from the fact. Instead of writing about my thread you attack me personally over English grammar errors!!! I can't wait to read your past threads.

    Five woman were murdered in a span of two months, three of them in the month of September, and two of them in one night. All were incapacitate either by garroting or strangulation before the fatal laceration to their carotid arteries and severe cut to their NECKS causing near decapitation.

    At least three of the 5 woman were disemboweled with severe mutilation on the body's with missing organs uterus, kidney, heart...

    Bob, your the resident genius here...let me ask you do we have a pattern here with these murders. These Horrific murders cannot be in your worthless expert opinion worthy of something as Diabolical as a satanic ritual, human offering, black magic whatever...

    I don't have all the answers and i never said i did however, given the totality of these murders and the discovery, how their initials of their last name in order of the way they were killed rearranges in a pentagram to spell NECKS the primary means of their deaths is something that need to be investigated.

    I don't care if no one agrees to this and i am not forcing the issue with anyone i thought it was a clever discovery and i wanted to share it to get people motivated.

    If you can go back to 1888 or after and someone, anyone, discovered what i am sharing with you; don't you think the police would have said, hey, were is that cop wannabe D'onston who's very interested in these murders at; and didn't he brag about or practice black magic...lets question him again.

    Bob, i expect my grammar correction soon... thats all your really good at Dan
    You may be right Dan, but at least I am good for something! Anyway onto the grammar lesson.


    You must be the geniuse (genius) of this forum and i (I) commend you on deciphering my thread... the whole near decapitation via by head or necks is impressive. (incomprehensible)

    I am so ashamed of my writing skills now,(so you should be) that i (I) decided to take your grammar 101 class; only after you solve the ripper (Ripper) murders.

    Fortunately for me i (I) don't have to worry about that, not in your lifetime.

    This is what i (I) mean about deflecting from the fact. Instead of writing about my thread you attack me personally over English grammar errors!!! (It’s not a case of that dear boy, it’s simply that you are writing gibberish and we can’t understand what you are trying to say. Ask your teacher to help you out with some basic writing skills. Is English your first language?)I can't wait to read your past threads. (Which is exactly what I suggested you do, read everyone’s past threads as they all know a lot more about the case than you do.)

    Five woman (women plural) were murdered in a span of two months, three of them in the month of September, and two of them in one night. All were incapacitate( incapacitated past tense) either by garroting (garrotting) or strangulation ( garrotting is strangulation – oxymoron) before the fatal laceration to their carotid arteries and severe cut to their NECKS ( necks -no capitalisation)causing near decapitation.

    At least three of the 5 woman were disembowled (disembowelled) with severe mutilation on the body's (bodies - plural of body, not possessive) with missing organs uterus, kidney, heart...

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by Hunter View Post
    I call it as I see it. Everybody going tit for tat on this thread is udderly ridiculous anyway.
    EGG-actly! what a hoot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hunter
    replied
    Originally posted by curious View Post
    very funny, Hunter!

    Only, being from a farming region in Tennessee myself, I suspect the noun to which you refer is actually udder.

    but then perhaps Doris meant "twit" for the second noun

    just guessing here and giggling.

    curious
    I call it as I see it. Everybody going tit for tat on this thread is udderly ridiculous anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Curious, Hunter,

    I guess we are the only tennessiens here, or are there others?

    Yours truly

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X