Hi Phil,
I'll post it tonight...you'll see...incredible!
Amitiés,
David
-
David,
I can't wait to see it! If it is anything like the last one David, we are in for a treat!
Hunter, just hanging loose...just hanging loose!
best wishes
PhilLeave a comment:
-
Hi Phil,
you know what ?
I voted "cover up or not"...not that I believe in any cover-up (sorry!) but because I've just come across an interview of Warren (in the French press) about Toff-the-Ripper...
I'm still shocked!
Amitiés,
DavidLeave a comment:
-
I voted serial killer or not because most of the others aren't rellevant without it or are skewed one way or the other because of it.
P. S. Hang in there Phil. People are listening to you.Leave a comment:
-
Most crucial points
26Sir Robert Anderson0.00%0Authentication of "newly discovered" material3.85%1A serial killer/ more than one killer/various killers19.23%5A cover-up or not by one or more officials11.54%3Differences in case conclusions between authors3.85%1Medical knowledge or not3.85%1The missing files/the SD Files38.46%10The differing opinions of the police as to who Jack was7.69%2The letters supposedly from "Jack"0.00%0Your own choice of sticking point11.54%3What single point, if you could chose one, is the most difficult theme in Ripperology to sort out? Here, I ask for a specific point, not a generalisation (i.e. What Jacks identity was).. I have put a few examples on the poll, but by all means come with others.
Thank you for your considerations.
best wishes
Phil
Leave a comment: