Martin Fido discovery 2018

[MrBarnett]

Hi Scott,

Even Thick couldn't have been as thick as he appears to have been about Pizer.

It's clear that they had some sort of arrangement.

How's your Lifetime Award shaping up?

Regards,

Simon

Thick identified someone who seems to have matched the profile of the man being described as LA. How thick was that?

[MrBarnett]

Could Pizer have been Thick's police informant?

Could have, but I haven't seen anything to support that. Perhaps you have?

[Simon Wood]

Hi Scott,

Even Thick couldn't have been as thick as he appears to have been about Pizer.

It's clear that they had some sort of arrangement.

How's your Lifetime Award shaping up?

Regards,

Simon

[Scott Nelson]

46 posts in, and people still probably believe Thick framed Piser.

Could Pizer have been Thick's police informant?

[Phil Carter]

You protest too much Phil.

And as I’ve stated, the depth of delegate knowledge is moot to this thread to some degree, and more connected to the whys as to the lack of mention in relation to Martin Fido’s ‘revelation’. So yeah, pertinent to a point.

As for speaking ill of those who cannot reply, my response is twofold. It’s their own fault for not being able to reply. Making threats and falistitys against the wife of the owner of this site kinda leads to a banning.

Secondly, do you really wish to travel the I’m holier than thou route? I would be unwise for you to do so.

Monty

I have not made that claim. I have only quoted my own involvement, and refuted your insinuation or question of "batting for others". Seems those replies suffice. Oh, and answered your questions with clarity, as requested. I repeat. No.

As I said earlier, I've no need to battle anyone. Too much wasted mental energy. Ive far more important things to battle against.

Regards

Phil

[Monty]

They do.

It is.

Your opinion.

Monty

[MrBarnett]

and none the Piser. Ok that was bad.

I've heard worse.

I wonder who this was. It's from 1915, so it can't be Leather Apron:



Does anyone know?

[MrBarnett]

Do they?

And is it an issue if they do?

Monty

They do.

It is.

[Abby Normal]

Only if they're Thick.

and none the Piser. Ok that was bad.

[Monty]

46 posts in, and people still probably believe Thick framed Piser.

Do they?

And is it an issue if they do?

Monty

[rjpalmer]

46 posts in, and people still probably believe Thick framed Piser.

Only if they're Thick.

[MrBarnett]

My double post was an error rather than an underlining.

[MrBarnett]

46 posts in, and people still probably believe Thick framed Piser.

[MrBarnett]

45 posts in, and people still probably believe Thick framed Piser.

[Monty]

You protest too much Phil.

And as I’ve stated, the depth of delegate knowledge is moot to this thread to some degree, and more connected to the whys as to the lack of mention in relation to Martin Fido’s ‘revelation’. So yeah, pertinent to a point.

As for speaking ill of those who cannot reply, my response is twofold. It’s their own fault for not being able to reply. Making threats and falistitys against the wife of the owner of this site kinda leads to a banning.

Secondly, do you really wish to travel the I’m holier than thou route? I would be unwise for you to do so.

Monty