Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If you could see one photo of someone from the case (excluding MJK)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    They're not that much different, Abby. Besides, it would be remarkable if only one of them, or indeed if the style of a significant number of letters, matched those of the older Hutchinson, which I'm absolutely certain that they do. Added to which we have the history passed down through the Topping family which, although undoubtedly flowered-up, could easily contain a grain of truth, as well as the definite fact that Toppy was of the right age to have plausibly passed as an acquaintance of Kelly at the time. There's zero doubt in my view that they're one and the same person.

    Anyway, that's for another thread.
    hi sam
    thanks! if you have were with all, could you post the three sigs from witness hutch and toppys sig, so I can take a look at them again? I could be persuaded.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Yup like Kosmimski, Pizer etc.

    I think the main thing the police could have done better was to use photography more. As in taking pictures of all , or most, valid suspects to show to witnesses.
    There is a detailed newspaper illustration of Pizer.
    Have you seen that one ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Hi sam
    The signatures on hutches statement are all different
    They're not that much different, Abby. Besides, it would be remarkable if only one of them, or indeed if the style of a significant number of letters, matched those of the older Hutchinson, which I'm absolutely certain that they do. Added to which we have the history passed down through the Topping family which, although undoubtedly flowered-up, could easily contain a grain of truth, as well as the definite fact that Toppy was of the right age to have plausibly passed as an acquaintance of Kelly at the time. There's zero doubt in my view that they're one and the same person.

    Anyway, that's for another thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    I loved Stephen's book, but the identification of Aussie George as our man is, in my view, rather tenuous. The comparative signatures have personally convinced me 100% that Toppy is indeed "the" Hutch.
    Hi sam
    The signatures on hutches statement are all different, making any comparison to toppy basically useless, there is no evidence that toppy was even in London at the time of the murders, and he was approached under dubious circumstances.. the royal conspiracy. At least we know Aussie hutch was in London, his leaving coinciding with the end of the murders.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    And I’m not too sure that toppy is hutch. I think there’s almost as good a chance if not more that ausssie George uncovered by Stephen Sinese is the witness.
    I loved Stephen's book, but the identification of Aussie George as our man is, in my view, rather tenuous. The comparative signatures have personally convinced me 100% that Toppy is indeed "the" Hutch.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
    Contemporary suspects like Charles Ludwig or William Piggott
    Yup like Kosmimski, Pizer etc.

    I think the main thing the police could have done better was to use photography more. As in taking pictures of all , or most, valid suspects to show to witnesses.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    Hello Abby,

    The good news is that we do have a photo of Hutch, albeit in old age, unless it was a contemporary image you were after.
    Yes contemporary.

    And I’m not too sure that toppy is hutch. I think there’s almost as good a chance if not more that ausssie George uncovered by Stephen Sinese is the witness.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Contemporary suspects like Charles Ludwig or William Piggott

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    I’d love to have seen what Pearly Poll looked like.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Hello Abby,

    The good news is that we do have a photo of Hutch, albeit in old age, unless it was a contemporary image you were after.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    As we're extremely unlikely to be able to identify the writer of the graffito, I'd prefer a few photos of the doorway at, say, 1AM. My guess is that the GSG was already there.
    Hi Sam
    George Hutchinson was in the Victoria home, gsg being in direct route from Mitre square (and close) and is also the only other source of evidence that specifically mentions a jew as a suspect.

    and it would also be hutch that id want to see a photo of.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    I’d like to add a photograph of the GSG to the list.
    As we're extremely unlikely to be able to identify the writer of the graffito, I'd prefer a few photos of the doorway at, say, 1AM. My guess is that the GSG was already there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Neither the Chapman crime-scene or GSG were people if I recall.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    I’d like to add a photograph of the GSG to the list.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pandora
    replied
    Originally posted by Barnaby View Post
    The Chapman crime scene. That way we could establish how far she was from the stoop, the height of the fence, etc.
    This gets my vote too.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X