Originally posted by miss marple
View Post
This would of course be an excellent opportunity for me to remind you of how extremely unforgiving you have been against me for pointing a finger at Lechmere - you found it revolting and deeply unethical, as I recall things.
And now here you are, naming a man as a strong candidate, even asking us "whatīs not to like"?
I will not seize the opportunity to mock you, though. You shall have my view, and I will ask you a few pertinent questions which I hope you will answer.
I am confident that the Ripper and the torso killer are one and the same. Therefore, the Kelly murder, removed seven months in time, is not the one I would look upon as the act that made Thomas do away with himself, but instead Elizabeth Jackson, in the very month of June 1889!
However, the Pinchin Street torso could not have been Thomas. And it is very unlikely that the 1873 torso of Battersea was his - he was 17 at the time. And I firmly believe these murders belong to the same man.
The one thing that looks most interesting to me - who think we may rule out that the killer had surgical expertise - is the returning to Wales after each killing. What I would like to know is that if it occurred on each of the four Ripper killing nights, or if it was more sporadic. How close in time to the killings was it? Did he otherwise not visit his father regularly?
And would it not be compatible with a frail pshyche that was giving way to seek refuge at his fatherīs place? We know that he chose that venue for his death, so it would seem he may have sought his fathers home out to soothe his nerves, something that ultimately failed. The two spent the sonīs last night in life together in the same sleeping room, apparently, which makes it sound terribly tragic to me.
That is my view. I am glad - as always - when somebody with competence and enthusiasm sets out to look deeper into a character I myself would not have the time to research. Welcome to the weird world of suspectology!
Leave a comment: