Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

12-year-old girl Murdered in London July 1890?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 12-year-old girl Murdered in London July 1890?

    Does anyone know anything about this?

    July 8, 1890

    "The body of a girl of 12 years has been discovered violated and mutilated in the same style as the former victims, attributed to Jack the Ripper."


  • #2
    I am just bumping this thread... does no one know anything about this at all?

    Comment


    • #3
      Rob, the only murder of a 12 year old girl in london that springs to mind was in the West End of London, but she was found strangled in an uninhabited newly built house, not very Ripper-like, but as the newspaper is an overseas one, it could have been a corruption of that story.
      Sorry to be so vague, I'm not even sure of the exact date of that murder, I think it was c 1890, and it's the only one I can think of and was unsolved.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks Debra,

        Do you know anywhere I might find more info on that?

        Rob

        Comment


        • #5
          Rob,
          Here's one of a few articles about the case I mentioned, not Ripper-like as I said, but the location was London, the year was 1890 and the girl was young (14 in this report, 12 in the one you posted) she was also said to be brutally outraged before being strangled, and as far as I can gather the case was never solved.

          Birmingham Daily Post Feb 15 1890
          Click image for larger version

Name:	Birmingham Daily Post (Birmingham, England), Saturday, February 15, 1890.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	196.7 KB
ID:	658100

          Comment


          • #6
            Thanks Debra,

            Very interesting. Of course it is some 5 months before the report I found in NZ, but it could probably be the same incident.

            Rob H

            Comment


            • #7
              That's true, although the British papers were still carrying the story right up until the end of May, and then continued in September. The case actually received some of the most extensive newspaper coverage I have ever seen relating to a single murder. Also, I once saw a Newzealand paper reproduce a story from the British press some 12 months after the actual event, so could be, like you say.

              Comment


              • #8
                Interestingly the papers believed the murder of this girl was one in a series in the same area, linked to disappearances of young girls going back a number of years.
                Does anyone know if this story appears in any books anywhere? I'd like to be able to read more on this.

                Comment


                • #9
                  This was the Jeffs murder which an inspector Harvey was assigned to. We discussed any relationship to PC Harvey who was dismissed after the Whitechapel murders, but didn't find any connection. It is interesting, however, that PC Harvey was now living in West Ham at least as late as 1889, but maybe later, and that the investigating officer had the same surname. I think the same inspector was involved in the murder (whose name escapes me) that was the subject of a Sickert painting.

                  Cheers,

                  Mike

                  Here's a link with some discussion: http://www.casebook.org/forum/messages/4927/5780.html

                  It was written about by Colin Wilson
                  Last edited by The Good Michael; 11-30-2009, 12:14 PM.
                  huh?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Macnaghten discusses it:

                    One of the earliest, and one of the strangest,
                    cases which ever came before me was the murder
                    of a girl about twelve years of age. The victim's
                    name was Amelia Jeffs, and the locality was West
                    Ham.

                    About the 2gth of January 1890, at eight
                    o'clock in the evening, a Mr. Jeffs reported to the
                    police at West Ham station that his daughter
                    had gone out some two hours before to execute
                    some small errand and had not returned, and
                    that he and her mother were very anxious about
                    her. The usual steps were taken, but day suc-
                    ceeded day, and no tidings of the missing child
                    were forthcoming. At this time a severe frost pre-
                    vailed, and work on buildings came to a stand-
                    still. Somewhere in the vicinity a row of houses
                    had just been erected in what was, I think, called



                    MISSING CHILDREN 125

                    the Portway, but none of them was suffi-
                    ciently advanced for habitation. On the I3th of
                    February, about fifteen days after the disappear-
                    ance of Amelia Jeffs, a workman had occasion to
                    go to the top storey of one of these houses, and,
                    on opening a large fixed cupboard let into the wall
                    under one of the front windows, was horrified to
                    find the body of a fully dressed child, which had
                    evidently been lying there for some days. Police
                    were at once informed, and in due course the corpse
                    was identified as that of the ill-starred Amelia
                    Jeffs.

                    In company of several local officers I was on
                    the scene as soon as possible, and if ever a case
                    repaid local and personal investigation this was
                    one. The body looked as if it had been " laid out "
                    by loving hands, as for decent burial, the little
                    hands were crossed on the bosom, the frock care-
                    fully pulled down, and the hat, which must have
                    fallen off in the house, was placed at, but not
                    on, the head. A medical inspection showed that
                    the child had been brutally outraged and then
                    strangled to death by her own comforter, which was
                    still hanging loose around the neck. From the
                    surroundings the crime was easy of reconstruc-
                    tion. Somebody had inveigled the victim into
                    the empty house, the door of which had, probably



                    126 DAYS OF MY YEARS

                    by accident, been left open, and the assault
                    must have taken place as the last flight of stairs
                    was being mounted. The screams of the girl
                    must have alarmed the brutal assailant, who, in
                    order to stifle them, pulled tight the ends of the
                    scarf. When he released his hold the child was
                    dead. Horrified at his deed, and hoping perhaps
                    to find there was still life in the body, the murderer
                    carried it to the top landing, and, in the back room,
                    supported it against the wall : the marks of the
                    heels of the little boots were plainly discernible
                    in the thick dust always to be found in newly
                    built houses. Subsequently the corpse was
                    carried into the front room and placed, as already
                    described, in the cupboard under the window.

                    No one was ever made amenable for this
                    awful crime. But the difference between the cases
                    of Mary Bailes and Amelia Jeffs was that, whereas
                    in the former no clue of any kind was discovered,
                    in the latter very grave suspicions attached to a
                    certain individual. Legal proofs were wanting,
                    and, there being no sufficient evidence to justify
                    an arrest, it must be classified as an " undis-
                    covered " crime.
                    huh?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thanks for this link, Mike!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Sure thing.
                        huh?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hi Debs,

                          I mentioned this case to you a couple of years back, there was a series of disappearances in the West Ham area dating back to 1881 of young children and some teenagers. I'll dig out the details.

                          The Illustrated Police News, Saturday 22 February 1890

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	The Illustrated Police News Saturay 22 February 1890 01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	169.6 KB
ID:	658103

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	The Illustrated Police News Saturay 22 February 1890 02.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	116.4 KB
ID:	658104

                          Rob

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Hi Rob,
                            I didn't realise at the time these were the ones you were interested in, I thought you were on about some other more gruesome child murders related to baby farming, that's why I was put off looking at them. If I'd known then this is what you meant!....

                            Actually, I thought I mentioned this since then to you (not knowing it was the one you'd mentioned to me ), when we were talking about Anderson interrogating a murder suspect that he said he could tell was guilty just by looking at him.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by robhouse View Post
                              Does anyone know anything about this?

                              July 8, 1890

                              "The body of a girl of 12 years has been discovered violated and mutilated in the same style as the former victims, attributed to Jack the Ripper."

                              http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi...---0ripper-all
                              Evidently this report was quite widely circulated around this time, but the following from the West Australian of 9 July makes it look as though the crime actually took place in Dusseldorf, and that its location dropped out of most of the subsequent reports:
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	TheWestAustralian9July1890.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	658739

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X