Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by Abby Normal 14 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by jerryd 14 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by jerryd 18 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by Abby Normal 23 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by jerryd 38 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by jerryd 53 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - (57 posts)
Non-Fiction: Scholes of the Yard: The Casebook of a Scotland Yard Detective 1888 to 1924 - (3 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Bucks Row Project - (1 posts)
Martha Tabram: Probibility of Martha Tabram Being a JtR Victim - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Victims > Mary Jane Kelly

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #211  
Old 04-24-2017, 09:52 AM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
Both had the same approximate time.
But did they?

According to the Echo's report of the inquest, Prater said:

"A black kitten, of which I am very fond, came to my bed, and rubbed itself against my face....it tried to get into the bed, and awoke me. That must have been about half-past four, as I heard the clock chiming. I pushed the kitten away...And, just as I pushed the kitten away I heard, "Oh! Murder!" It was as if it was a nightmare. It was just "Oh! Oh! (in a faint, gasping way) - Murder!"

So Prater is very clear, she heard the cry literally immediately after she heard "the clock" (which can only be the Spitalfields clock) chime (which she thought was the chime at 4.30).

But then according to the same report of the inquest, Lewis said:

"I woke at about half-past three. I heard Spitalfields clock strike...I could not sleep. I sat awake from then until a little before four o'clock, when I heard a female voice. It was a scream."

So, even allowing for the fact that Prater might have meant 3.30 or 4.00 rather than 4.30, the two accounts are completely different because Lewis said she heard the cry before 4am, and thus BEFORE the strike of the clock at that time, whereas Prater said she heard the cry AFTER the strike of the clock.

If their evidence is accurate they cannot have heard the same cry.
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 04-24-2017, 09:58 AM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
...cue Diddles...
I appreciate that you have a long held theory that the cat was disturbed and thus woke Prater but I can't see that it has much to recommend it.

What awoke Prater was the cat rubbing her face and trying to get into her bed. There is nothing to suggest it had been alarmed or disturbed. Most importantly, Prater did not make any such suggestion.

Did Prater's cat wake her every single time it heard a noise of someone tapping on a door or window in the busy court? That seems unlikely. Mary Ann Cox said she heard several men going in and out that night alone.
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 04-24-2017, 10:19 AM
Michael W Richards Michael W Richards is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Orsam View Post
But did they?

According to the Echo's report of the inquest, Prater said:

"A black kitten, of which I am very fond, came to my bed, and rubbed itself against my face....it tried to get into the bed, and awoke me. That must have been about half-past four, as I heard the clock chiming. I pushed the kitten away...And, just as I pushed the kitten away I heard, "Oh! Murder!" It was as if it was a nightmare. It was just "Oh! Oh! (in a faint, gasping way) - Murder!"

So Prater is very clear, she heard the cry literally immediately after she heard "the clock" (which can only be the Spitalfields clock) chime (which she thought was the chime at 4.30).

But then according to the same report of the inquest, Lewis said:

"I woke at about half-past three. I heard Spitalfields clock strike...I could not sleep. I sat awake from then until a little before four o'clock, when I heard a female voice. It was a scream."

So, even allowing for the fact that Prater might have meant 3.30 or 4.00 rather than 4.30, the two accounts are completely different because Lewis said she heard the cry before 4am, and thus BEFORE the strike of the clock at that time, whereas Prater said she heard the cry AFTER the strike of the clock.

If their evidence is accurate they cannot have heard the same cry.
From Elizabeth at the Inquest" A kitten disturbed me about half-past three o'clock or a quarter to four. As I was turning round I heard a suppressed cry of "Oh - murder!" in a faint voice. It seemed to proceed from the court."

So she heard it around 3:45.

From Sarah at the Inquest:"I sat awake until nearly four, when I heard a female's voice shouting "Murder" loudly. It seemed like the voice of a young woman. It sounded at our door."

Not inconsistent with Elizabeth at all.

Your suggestion that they heard different cries is interesting but contrary to the accepted evidence. There were not 2 separate cries of murder that night around 3:45.
__________________
Michael Richards
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 04-24-2017, 10:28 AM
John G John G is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
From Elizabeth at the Inquest" A kitten disturbed me about half-past three o'clock or a quarter to four. As I was turning round I heard a suppressed cry of "Oh - murder!" in a faint voice. It seemed to proceed from the court."

So she heard it around 3:45.

From Sarah at the Inquest:"I sat awake until nearly four, when I heard a female's voice shouting "Murder" loudly. It seemed like the voice of a young woman. It sounded at our door."

Not inconsistent with Elizabeth at all.

Your suggestion that they heard different cries is interesting but contrary to the accepted evidence. There were not 2 separate cries of murder that night around 3:45.
"Faint cry" and "seemed to proceed from the court" is all a bit vague, don't you think?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 04-24-2017, 10:31 AM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
So she heard it around 3:45.
But if you are referring to her deposition, Prater is recorded as saying "I noticed the lodging house was out, so it was after 4 probably". That's not 3.45 is it?
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 04-24-2017, 11:02 AM
Michael W Richards Michael W Richards is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Orsam View Post
But if you are referring to her deposition, Prater is recorded as saying "I noticed the lodging house was out, so it was after 4 probably". That's not 3.45 is it?
From The Inquest transcripts in the Telegraph on Nov 13th..."A kitten disturbed me about half-past three o'clock or a quarter to four."
__________________
Michael Richards
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 04-24-2017, 11:07 AM
Michael W Richards Michael W Richards is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John G View Post
"Faint cry" and "seemed to proceed from the court" is all a bit vague, don't you think?
Not if she heard it through an open window and if the voice was directing the sound waves back into the court. The bouncing waves would be faint by the time they reached her.

The faint cry is also indicative of what I suggested earlier...she wasn't crying out for help.
__________________
Michael Richards
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 04-24-2017, 11:11 AM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
From The Inquest transcripts in the Telegraph on Nov 13th..."A kitten disturbed me about half-past three o'clock or a quarter to four."
But we see from her deposition that she then corrected herself:

"I slept soundly until a kitten disturbed me about 3.30 to 4. I noticed the lodging house light was out, so it was after 4 probably - I heard a cry of oh! Murder!"

And, as I asked you earlier, "after 4" is not 3.45 is it?
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 04-24-2017, 11:13 AM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
The faint cry is also indicative of what I suggested earlier...she wasn't crying out for help.
Oh it was a "faint cry" was it?

That's odd because according to the deposition of Sarah Lewis:

"a little before 4 I heard a female voice shout loudly one Murder!"

The sound is then described as a "scream".
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 04-24-2017, 11:27 AM
John G John G is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
Not if she heard it through an open window and if the voice was directing the sound waves back into the court. The bouncing waves would be faint by the time they reached her.

The faint cry is also indicative of what I suggested earlier...she wasn't crying out for help.
Well, there are all sorts of possibilities. However, the fact is she couldn't even be sure that the sound emanated from the court, let alone a specific room.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.