Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kelly inquest/Smithkey

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    But the question of the jury perhaps having signed two copies is not a solution to the problem of the missing original.
    I haven't said it is my dear boy.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
      I haven't said it is my dear boy.
      So why do you refer to #36?

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Pierre View Post
        So why do you refer to #36?
        My dear boy, you asked a question in the OP of this thread and I have answered it. The printed handwritings in Smithkey are printed from the original papers of the coroner as held in the London Metropolitan Archives. Those papers include unsigned depositions only, so you can draw whatever conclusion you want to draw from that.

        I can't answer every single question that pops into your head...

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
          My dear boy, you asked a question in the OP of this thread and I have answered it. The printed handwritings in Smithkey are printed from the original papers of the coroner as held in the London Metropolitan Archives. Those papers include unsigned depositions only, so you can draw whatever conclusion you want to draw from that.

          I can't answer every single question that pops into your head...
          But have you actually seen the original and not just the copies?

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Pierre View Post
            But have you actually seen the original and not just the copies?
            Yes, of course.

            Comment

            Working...
            X