Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
General Suspect Discussion: Favorite suspect/s? - by MrBarnett 7 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Caroline Maxwell Alibi ? - by Wickerman 48 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Caroline Maxwell Alibi ? - by Wickerman 52 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Favorite suspect/s? - by Herlock Sholmes 1 hour and 3 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Favorite suspect/s? - by MrBarnett 2 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Favorite suspect/s? - by Herlock Sholmes 3 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
General Suspect Discussion: Favorite suspect/s? - (22 posts)
Witnesses: Caroline Maxwell Alibi ? - (15 posts)
Witnesses: What EXACTLY did Maurice Lewis say? - (5 posts)
Witnesses: Our Charles Cross - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Motive, Method and Madness

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-10-2009, 04:42 PM
sdreid sdreid is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
Posts: 4,957
Default

Perhaps he didn't need a start, that is, he just was. In other words, he was a sort of criminal idiot savant.
__________________
This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

Stan Reid
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-10-2009, 07:36 PM
Roy Corduroy Roy Corduroy is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,577
Cool

Good one, Stan. That's gonna be hard to top.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-10-2009, 10:27 PM
perrymason
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If the man referred to as Jack only really killed 2 or perhaps 3 women Stan, would we still want to put some label like "cunning", or 'idiot savant" on him?

To my eye if JtR only killed 2 women,.... equally as possible and I believe more plausible than he definitely killed only 5...., then he needed to be nothing but somewhat familiar with anatomy and unaffected by the resulting gore caused by his actions. He could have been so ordinary and so lucky on the nights he did kill. And by late Fall his acts would be among many acts that he was being accused of, which had a cumulative effect of suggesting a profile that was unlike himself. Someone "cunning"....or an idiot savant, who had a very low IQ but a natural "knack" for the tasks.

If "Jack" only killed say Polly and Annie......then really how clever was he? Clever enough to change venues whens the first didnt allow him enough time, and clever enough to extricate abdominal organs in the early dawn. But no phantom menace or the like.

Maybe just a few small, specific, acts.

That need not require animal field studies beforehand.

Cheers all
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-11-2009, 01:53 PM
Johnr Johnr is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 385
Default

I initially laughed at SJReid's concept of an "idiot savant" serial killer.
Sort of like "The Rainman" with a knife?
But later comments about such a candidate's "cunning" rather than professional qualifications in cadaver quartering, made me think again.
Yes, the Ripper certainly must have had cunning and luck!
These two factors would have added to his/her drive and determination to complete yet another "job".
Perhaps I was a little unkind to Gareth. After all, it was Fisherman who first suggested most farmers are/were potential Rippers.Sorry Gareth.
It was also Fisherman who pointed out Europeans have a different attitude to how they treat domestic animals like pets: cats, dogs and hamsters.
And how they treat working animals like pigs, goats, sheep and sometimes horses.
I also agree with Ashkenaz about the early development of these urges coming through as the McDonald troika.
The psychological torture of fellow school chums is interesting though.
Druitt, for one, was very popular at Winchester. Head boy or something.Was he like "School Bully" in Michael Palin's " Ripping Yarns " series?
A steriotypical bully to younger boys?
And could this - along with cruelty to animals - have been his way of securing "power" over more impressionable classmates?
Yes, Lynn, we are like-thinkers. Druitt certainly could have absorbed some sort of medical knowledge. He was regarded as bright and promising at school.
Did he keep in contact with his Uncle Robert Druitt, a luminary in London's medical circles to help him if he wanted to do study medicine?
Diana deserves a prize for starting this thread. In my opinion. JOHN RUFFELS.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-11-2009, 02:07 PM
Fisherman Fisherman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 17,131
Default

John Ruffels writes:

"After all, it was Fisherman who first suggested most farmers are/were potential Rippers."

Actually no; I merely stated that if contact with the many aspects of animal farming were to lead to Rippership, then there would be an awful lot of Rippers around .... so itīs the other way around, to be honest!

The best,
Fisherman
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-11-2009, 03:26 PM
Johnr Johnr is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 385
Default "mr Ruffels" Is Not A Pet's Name!

[quote=Fisherman;98176]Considering how many people were involved in the many aspects of animal farming, we will have plenty of potential Jacks!=QUOTE]

Sorry Fisherman.

It just looked like that was what you were saying!

JOHN RUFFELS.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-11-2009, 03:58 PM
Fisherman Fisherman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 17,131
Default

Mmm – I tried the old irony approach, but it seems I failed to some extent. Seriously, though, if animal production had instead produced Rippers by the hundreds and thousands, I suspect we would have heard of it...!

The best, John!
Fisherman
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-11-2009, 04:09 PM
lynn cates lynn cates is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,841
Default some obscure remarks

Hello. I suppose the "butchering" would have different effects on different people. But if one has a pre-existing and underlying personality defect . . .

I think Hardy brings out the other extreme in his "Jude the Obscure" when Jude butchers the pig and is sickened by it. On the other hand, the personality type I suggest could be thrilled by the experience and need only some bizarre catalyst--like violent pornography (did Victorian England have such?) to touch him off.

LC
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-11-2009, 08:14 PM
johnnyerwin johnnyerwin is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 30
Default

This is an interesting thread. Given that there are other examples of animal cruelty in murder cases it would not surprise me at all if the person(s) involved in the ripper murders also "experimented" in this way.

Here's some possible profiles that might use this angle:

1. A slaughterer/butcher/similar (or person with such experience in past). Obviously has a few screws loose, possibly had a troubled childhood. Hatred of Women. Trade gives them the skill with the knife, also the desensitization to the gore involved. Early "experiments" with tradecraft may have desensitized them to acts of extreme cruelty.

2. A given person (with any vocation) that early on in life started to molest/kill/torture animals (any that they would have access to). Possible god complex. Possible rudimentary knowledge of anatomy provided somewhere in lifetime from a variety of possible sources. At some point in life person starts taking risks with larger subjects, at some point making the jump from animal to human. Likely has sexually molested animals and/or children. May be connected to rape/molestation cases.

I have no profiling experience, this is just conjecture and involves in part information I've read regarding other cases. I am personally not inclined to believe that the perp(s) have any extensive medical knowledge, however that is not to say that they were not a student at one time (possibly fitting into category 2 above).

Comments?
__________________
John Erwin
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-11-2009, 09:53 PM
HollyDolly HollyDolly is offline
Constable
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 50
Default

Could Druitt been caught in the act of perhasp torturing or killing an animal like a cat or a puppy and that was why he was dismissed? Or could it have been maybe that he was engaged in some other behaviour which Valentine discovered by accident, and was disgusted by and again dismissed him?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.