Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Wickerman 1 minute ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Michael W Richards 3 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by rjpalmer 39 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by Kaz 4 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by c.d. 6 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Paddy 8 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - (12 posts)
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - (3 posts)
Shades of Whitechapel: Centenaries - whole and half - (2 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Letters and Communications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-01-2016, 05:27 PM
Elamarna Elamarna is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: South london
Posts: 3,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Orsam View Post
If the killer was a police officer of the Metropolitan Police Force then Sir Charles Warren was (presumably) the killer's boss.

Do you think he might be heading in that direction?
Given that he has told us many times today, it is a hoax based on the 29th inst. letter i do not see how he can.

Even if he were to argue that, then surly it would be sent to the Police, as was the letter of the 24th, not the central News agency.


in addition it has been hinted at that the person was of high Social standing and the person was well educated, it would seem as if it could be a senior officer. Well in that case Macnaghten was not in the police in 1888, Monro was not in the Met, so neither of those two would address it to Warren as Boss.
steve

Last edited by Elamarna : 01-01-2016 at 05:40 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-01-2016, 05:40 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elamarna View Post
pierre

without looking too hard I point out one, written 24th September, delivered to CID of the Met on the 25th.

why can't you do your own research?
Because the great scientist has noida how to research, isn't that obvious to all who read his drivel?
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-01-2016, 05:41 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Orsam View Post
If the killer was a police officer of the Metropolitan Police Force then Sir Charles Warren was (presumably) the killer's boss.

Do you think he might be heading in that direction?
If he is, bet he changes the direction a few times, that's his track record anyway.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-01-2016, 05:50 PM
Rosella Rosella is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,542
Default

For all we know Pierre might be pointing at Warren himself. After all Warren was an athletic sort of fellow when he was younger, virtually surfing through sewers in Jerusalem . Maybe that's how he got away in London after each murder. Steal a police uniform from a laundry, (a black uniform, according to Pierre) then duck under a manhole cover and swim back to Scotland Yard!
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-02-2016, 03:02 AM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elamarna View Post
pierre

without looking too hard I point out one, written 24th September, delivered to CID of the Met on the 25th.

why can't you do your own research?
Hi Steve,

Sure I can. I just thought that you might know the answer. Thanks, Steve.

So there was only one single letter from someone claiming to have done the killings before the hoax letter "Dear Boss" and it was sent to Warren. And the source we have between these two is the one I think is authentic. I will from now on call this letter The Ripper Letter or TRL.

Now, one must argue that there are problems with these three letters. The first one goes:

"Dear sir

I do wish to give myself up I am in misery with nightmare I am the man who committed all these murders in the last six months my name is so [drawing of coffin] and so I am horse slauterer and work at Name [blacked out] address [blacked out]

I have found the woman I wanted that is chapman and I done what I called slautered her but if any one comes I will surrender but I am not going to walk to the station by myself so I am yours truly
[drawing of coffin]

Keep the Boro road clear or I might take a trip up there

Photo

[drawing of knife]

of knife

this is the knife that I done these murders with it is a small handle with a large long blade sharpe both sides"

http://wiki.casebook.org/index.php/24_September_Letter

A short analysis of this letter implies that this could not be the killer since he writes:

" I am the man who committed all these murders in the last six months".

This would mean that he murdered Emma Smith - but she was attacked by three or four youths. So this can not be an authentic letter.

The "Dear Boss" letter was a hoax letter so this can not be an authentic letter either.


The Ripper Letter is using a metaphorical language. It gives the information that the killer will strike on September 30th in "the Minories" were he will kill two women. The Minories was an old parish covering both the murder sites.

So this can be an authentic letter.

Steve, you say that this source was somehow officially published decades later? Do you know where and by whom?


Kind regards, Pierre

Last edited by Pierre : 01-02-2016 at 03:07 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-02-2016, 03:12 AM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,173
Default

Can someone explain what Trollierre is saying above. Does he believe 24 Sept is real or a Hoax, does he believe "Dear Boss" is real or a Hoax.

Please no one tell him about From Hell or Saucy Jack, or any of the others for that matter, especially not the mikerscope
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-02-2016, 03:20 AM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUT View Post
Can someone explain what Trollierre is saying above. Does he believe 24 Sept is real or a Hoax, does he believe "Dear Boss" is real or a Hoax.

Please no one tell him about From Hell or Saucy Jack, or any of the others for that matter, especially not the mikerscope
Dear Boss is a hoax.

The letter from the 24th is not authentic.

The other letter, which I have decided to give the hypothetical name The Ripper Letter or TRL, should be authentic.

Regards, Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-02-2016, 03:27 AM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post

The other letter, which I have decided to give the hypothetical name The Ripper Letter or TRL, should be authentic.

Regards, Pierre
should be????

By what criteria?

Oh it fts your ideas, so it should be authentic.

Now I get it.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-02-2016, 03:49 AM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUT View Post
should be????

By what criteria?

Oh it fts your ideas, so it should be authentic.

Now I get it.
Hi,

Interpretation is an important part of the internal source criticism, GUT.

So using internal source criticism this should be an authentic letter by the following criteria:

1. The Ripper Letter is using a metaphorical language.

This is something we have in several of his communications. It is distinctive for his style of writing. It is connected to his tendency: He wants the police to see that he is smarter then them. He wants to give them a good chance but can not be explicit. So he must use another language.

2. It gives the information that the killer will strike around midnight on September 30th in "the Minories" were he will kill two women.

Using internal source criticism we ask if the author of the letter had a possibility to tell the truth?

The answer is yes, since the killer did strike on September 30th in the area given in this letter. He also had the possibility of telling the police the exact number of the victims on this night: two. And he also gave the time for when he would be in the area.

Given these facts (which I hereby establish, knowing that the external source criticism is pointing to the problem of the late publishing of this source) I think this is a primary source written by the killer.

So this should be the first authentic letter from him.

Regards, Pierre

Last edited by Pierre : 01-02-2016 at 03:53 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-02-2016, 03:54 AM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Hi,

Interpretation is an important part of the internal source criticism, GUT.

So using internal source criticism this should be an authentic letter by the following criteria:

1. The Ripper Letter is using a metaphorical language.

This is something we have in several of his communications. It is distinctive for his style of writing. It is connected to his tendency: He wants the police to see that he is smarter then them. He wants to give the police a good chance but can not be explicit. So he must use another language.

2. It gives the information that the killer will strike on September 30th in "the Minories" were he will kill two women.

Using internal source criticism we ask if the author of the letter had a possibility to tell the truth?

The answer is yes, since the killer did strike on September 30th in the area given in this letter. He also had the possibility of telling the police the exact number of the victims on this night: two. And he also gave the time for when he would be in the area.

Given these facts (which I hereby establish, knowing that the external source criticism is pointing to the problem of the late publishing of this source) I think this is a primary source written by the killer.

So this should be the first authentic letter from him.

Regards, Pierre
Of course we only have metaphorical language in his letters if we know which letters are his.

Why not say HIS letters have no metaphoriical language therefore this can't be his.

And as has been pointed out before I think you mean coded language, like the mile rubbish.
Can anyone say Circular Reasoning.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.