Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - by Michael W Richards 23 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - by Michael W Richards 46 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: And This Is Factual! - by DirectorDave 3 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - by Busy Beaver 4 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - by Herlock Sholmes 5 hours ago.
General Police Discussion: Leaving one's beat - by Pcdunn 11 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Maybrick, James: Diary Handwriting - (8 posts)
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - (7 posts)
Maybrick, James: And This Is Factual! - (4 posts)
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (2 posts)
Rippercast: Questions for Michael Hawley - Jack the Ripper Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety - (2 posts)
General Police Discussion: Leaving one's beat - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Scene of the Crimes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2017, 07:14 AM
ArmchairsLeuth ArmchairsLeuth is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 14
Default Leather Apron found at Hanbury Street

Hi all. Thinking a bit here about a clean leather apron that was apparently found at the Annie Chapman scene. If that's true and one was indeed left there, is this some sort of Zodiac-style taking taunting of the police, given the fuss that was going on around John Pizer/'leather apron' at around that same time?

I'm just thinking here. There seem to be a few instances where Z took inspiration from JtR. What think you, kind people?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2017, 07:25 AM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmchairsLeuth View Post
Hi all. Thinking a bit here about a clean leather apron that was apparently found at the Annie Chapman scene. If that's true and one was indeed left there, is this some sort of Zodiac-style taking taunting of the police, given the fuss that was going on around John Pizer/'leather apron' at around that same time?

I'm just thinking here. There seem to be a few instances where Z took inspiration from JtR. What think you, kind people?
No. it was left there by one of the tenants sons-they had a tools and stuff in the basement. I believe he had washed and left it there to dry.
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-21-2017, 07:54 AM
Patrick S Patrick S is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmchairsLeuth View Post
Hi all. Thinking a bit here about a clean leather apron that was apparently found at the Annie Chapman scene. If that's true and one was indeed left there, is this some sort of Zodiac-style taking taunting of the police, given the fuss that was going on around John Pizer/'leather apron' at around that same time?

I'm just thinking here. There seem to be a few instances where Z took inspiration from JtR. What think you, kind people?
If memory serves it belonged to John Richardson (he who cut an offending bit of leather from his boot at the back of number 29 at around 4:45 the night of the murder). He was - I believe - a porter at Spitalfields Market (?) and helped with is mother's business (she lived in and ran a packing business out of 29 Hanbury Street). Richardson had stopped to check the locks that morning since there'd been a recent robbery at the property. The apron aws his, had become mildewed and his mother had washed it and left it in the yard a few days previous.

In my view, Jack the Ripper didn't taunt the police. I don't believe that the killer wrote any of the letters to the police, to the press, or to Lusk. I don't believe that the killer wrote in Goulston Street. That said, the Zodiac may have written his letters, emulating his impression or understanding of what HE believed Jack the Ripper had done. The letters are well known and many believe they were written by the killer (especially those not all that familiar). So, Zodiac may have believed it as well and used it as inspiration. For me, that's where any comparison must end. I see two very different killers. Of course, neither were identified. So, they are very much linked in that way.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-21-2017, 08:52 AM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick S View Post
If memory serves it belonged to John Richardson (he who cut an offending bit of leather from his boot at the back of number 29 at around 4:45 the night of the murder). He was - I believe - a porter at Spitalfields Market (?) and helped with is mother's business (she lived in and ran a packing business out of 29 Hanbury Street). Richardson had stopped to check the locks that morning since there'd been a recent robbery at the property. The apron aws his, had become mildewed and his mother had washed it and left it in the yard a few days previous.

In my view, Jack the Ripper didn't taunt the police. I don't believe that the killer wrote any of the letters to the police, to the press, or to Lusk. I don't believe that the killer wrote in Goulston Street. That said, the Zodiac may have written his letters, emulating his impression or understanding of what HE believed Jack the Ripper had done. The letters are well known and many believe they were written by the killer (especially those not all that familiar). So, Zodiac may have believed it as well and used it as inspiration. For me, that's where any comparison must end. I see two very different killers. Of course, neither were identified. So, they are very much linked in that way.
yes that's it thanks Patrick.
and yes, the Zodiac and the ripper were completely different kinds of serial killers. Zodiac was a thrill killer and ripper post mortem mutilator. The former (like son of sam)are much more known to write letters than the latter (think Dahmer, bundy).
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-21-2017, 10:58 AM
ArmchairsLeuth ArmchairsLeuth is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 14
Default

Patrick, I don't believe most of the letters to be genuine. The only one that gives me pause (far from convinced though) is the Lusk Letter. Dear Boss had to have been fake, the language used in it doesn't fit with the sort of person who could do what the ripper did to MJK and to a lesser extent CE.

I also agree that JtR did not write the GSG. I cannot make my head get to a place where that makes sense. Crazed killer with somewhat bloody hands and the knife fleeing through the streets knowing police are all over the place stops and thinks 'ooh, hang on. Gotta write this on a wall, now where did I put my chalk?' Nope. Not working for me at all. The apron found there too on the other hand.........

Abby, thank you! You guys amaze me, all of you. I've considered myself a when-I-can ripperologist for about 10 years now I think and haven't even scratched the surface yet. (Edit: horrific pun was NOT intended) And yes, you make an excellent point. SoS, Z et al were all about the psychology as well as the actual killing. This guy was.....not. Especially since today i think it was AK. yesterday I was convinced it was Cohen, last week it was Cream. Not sure why I never thought of that myself, it makes much more sense now you point it out!

Last edited by ArmchairsLeuth : 08-21-2017 at 11:00 AM. Reason: Oh good grief, I'm so sorry.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-24-2017, 10:24 AM
Michael W Richards Michael W Richards is online now
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick S View Post
If memory serves it belonged to John Richardson (he who cut an offending bit of leather from his boot at the back of number 29 at around 4:45 the night of the murder). He was - I believe - a porter at Spitalfields Market (?) and helped with is mother's business (she lived in and ran a packing business out of 29 Hanbury Street). Richardson had stopped to check the locks that morning since there'd been a recent robbery at the property. The apron aws his, had become mildewed and his mother had washed it and left it in the yard a few days previous.

In my view, Jack the Ripper didn't taunt the police. I don't believe that the killer wrote any of the letters to the police, to the press, or to Lusk. I don't believe that the killer wrote in Goulston Street. That said, the Zodiac may have written his letters, emulating his impression or understanding of what HE believed Jack the Ripper had done. The letters are well known and many believe they were written by the killer (especially those not all that familiar). So, Zodiac may have believed it as well and used it as inspiration. For me, that's where any comparison must end. I see two very different killers. Of course, neither were identified. So, they are very much linked in that way.
Of all the letters claiming to be from the killer at large, only 1 came with biological material that was never proven, or disproven, to have been taken from the Mitre Square victim. The fact that they could not connect that specific organ to Kate is hardly dismissal grounds, they were not able to using their primitive scientific tools. Had the kidney survived, who knows?
__________________
Michael Richards
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2017, 11:46 AM
Michael W Richards Michael W Richards is online now
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,197
Default

Since we have known all along that the apron was owned by someone who used leather aprons from that same house...with only a brief period after its discovery where this fact was unknown...the fascination should be over with this artifact. The only way it remains interesting is that it was used as an excuse to exonerate Pizer by the police...by coercing him into stating that a name that was never known to be used to describe him by anyone, was indeed his anyway.

What they did is extinguish the idea that this Leather Apron fellow some of the street girls talked about was still roaming about untethered. Which of course he was. They never removed the Leather Apron threat at all, they instead tried to pin it on someone else, someone they could exonerate.
__________________
Michael Richards
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-28-2017, 12:33 PM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,910
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
The only way it remains interesting is that it was used as an excuse to exonerate Pizer by the police...by coercing him into stating that a name that was never known to be used to describe him by anyone, was indeed his anyway.
Sorry Michael, how was the leather apron found at the crime scene "used as an excuse to exonerate Pizer by the police"? How was Pizer "coerced" into anything? And how are you in a position to say that the name "Leather Apron" was never known to be used to describe him by anyone? What about the woman who accosted him in the street? What about Sergeant Thick?

Are you describing what actually happened in 1888 or a fictionalised version of what happened that you have created in your mind?
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-28-2017, 12:35 PM
Patrick S Patrick S is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
Of all the letters claiming to be from the killer at large, only 1 came with biological material that was never proven, or disproven, to have been taken from the Mitre Square victim. The fact that they could not connect that specific organ to Kate is hardly dismissal grounds, they were not able to using their primitive scientific tools. Had the kidney survived, who knows?
I'm careful to uses terms like "I believe" and "in my opinion". I'm pretty sure I did so here. I'm not in the business of "dismissing" much of anything related to the Whitechapel murders.

Last edited by Patrick S : 08-28-2017 at 12:38 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-28-2017, 12:38 PM
Patrick S Patrick S is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
Since we have known all along that the apron was owned by someone who used leather aprons from that same house...with only a brief period after its discovery where this fact was unknown...the fascination should be over with this artifact.
It came up because someone rather new to the boards asked a question about it. I don't sense any burgeoning fascination, however.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.